Posted on 10/05/2012 5:59:35 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
I dont get it. Why would the Foreign Policy President, who supported the revolutions in Libya and Egypt, not want to talk about that?
I thought he likes talking about foreign policy.
Weeks before the presidential election, President Barack Obamas administration faces mounting opposition from within the ranks of U.S. intelligence agencies over what career officers say is a cover up of intelligence information about terrorism in North Africa.
Intelligence held back from senior officials and the public includes numerous classified reports revealing clear Iranian support for jihadists throughout the tumultuous North Africa and Middle East region, as well as notably widespread al Qaeda penetration into Egypt and Libya in the months before the deadly Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi
Officials with access to intelligence reports, based on both technical spying and human agents, said specific reporting revealed an alarming surge in clandestine al Qaeda activity months before the attack in Benghazi
The Obama Administration is afraid to admit al Qaeda is running rampant throughout the region because it would expose the truth instead of what President Obama so pompously spouted during the Democratic Convention said the official.
Follow the link for allegations that AQ is coordinating in Egypt via Al-Azhar University with the help of Mohammed al-Zawahiri, brother of you-know-who and, until this year, a prisoner of the Egyptian government. That was news to me, but the possibility of Al Qaeda setting up shop in Libya was not. Two reports prepared for Congress and released in August before the attack in Benghazi warned explicitly that the power vacuum in Libya combined with easy access to heavy weapons stolen from Qaddafis stockpiles made the country a natural draw for jihadists. One of those reports claimed that Al Qaedas senior leadership in Pakistan had dispatched top operatives to Libya with orders to start setting up a new network there under a different name. All of this was an entirely foreseeable consequence of toppling Mubarak and Qaddafi, and arguably a price worth paying in order to set those countries on track to democracy and, maybe someday, more liberal societies. But note: Entirely foreseeable. If youre going to up-end the political table in these countries in the name of ousting autocrats, then you need to plan for an inevitable period of chaos and terror in the aftermath. Did we do that in Benghazi? Based on what we know right now, it looks like we did the opposite: Less security, not more, even when more was requested. Watch the new clip below from ABC and Jake Tapper for the latest on that. Madness.
Id love to hear the Foreign Policy President explain why his State Department didnt think to ramp up protection for Chris Stevens in Al Qaedas new backyard, but I think we all know what his public statement about the situation is going to be. No explanations forthcoming.
Yep.
I haven't read the text....I assume it agrees with the Video.
It worked for me. I will say it seems that the big TV networks have the worst designed websites and use the clunkiest video software on the internets.
Obama+Hillary = Treason
Yes, I just now watched that video. I think it substantially matches the text.
Dai vs. NIAC :The real David vs. Goliath story ( Iranian Lobby hidden in Washington --revealed)
Appears that had heavy influence on Obama's Iran policies via Valerie Jarrett.
I went back to a rel 10 Mint with Firefox 10....That worked.
yep. you are correct.
...though some even here, thought the Arab Spring, especially in Libya, was a good thing.
(Like that idiot McCain, who now wants to do the same in Syria... adding to the Islamist collection.)
=
also, many believed the “mantra” that Sunni Al-Quada would never cooperate with Shia Iran...
and what about the Palestinians imported to this country...
That's the flag they want to see flying at the White House.
I don’t give much of a sh*t about Egypt or Libya — I want to know how deep AQ has penetrated into our society.
Thankfully SEALs BUD/S classes continue as we speak. ;-)
Bears repeating - and this is what I was going to say myself.
Because he is one. Always was.
Plenty intel folks know. Trust them to move when the time comes.
Obama treats the American people like Mushrooms ,keep them in the dark and feed them sh#t
Hey, you're not trying to make muzzies riot are you? You blast femur!
I have noticed that as well.
My guess is that they are 'directed' to purchase these 'products' from government supported/funded companies (startups) that are just fronts for passing through CAMPAIGN funds.
On the other hand, it may be because of the PLAN to CHARGE for all VIDEO on the internet. That's why YOUTUBE's player is SO CRAPPY.
After all, if there were program (Video Player) that worked well (which there is, actually there are several), then why wouldn't everyone use the same program ? Why does everyone have to keep RE-INVENTING the WHEEL ? Is it because of MONEY ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.