Posted on 09/06/2012 8:24:18 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake
Apparently, archaeologists have also found a few human skeletal remains at the excavation site
By Sanskrity Sinha: Subscribe to Sanskrity's RSS feed
September 4, 2012 11:10 AM GMT
More than hundred bones of animals, now extinct, that thrived over 10,000 years ago (the late Pleistocene period), have been discovered in the state of Hidalgo, in central-eastern Mexico.
The discovery was made at a construction site of a wastewater treatment plant near the river El Salto in the city of Atotonilco de Tula, archaeologists at the National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH), announced in a statement.
Follow us
The remains include bones of several extinct animals including mastodons and mammoths among others, which were found scattered at different distances within an area of approximately 100 hectares, and as deep as 10 metres.
The skeletal remains of extinct animals, some of which measure up to 1.60 m, corresponding to ribs, vertebrae, skulls, jaws, defences (fangs), horns and shells, of species such as glyptodont, mastodon, mammoth, camel, horse, deer, bison and possibly other as yet unidentified, INAH archaeologists said, adding that it took about five months of excavation work to dig out all the remains.
Though remains of mammoths have been found in the past as well, archaeologists are dubbing it as the biggest discovery of the Ice Ages large-bodied animal remains ever made in the region.
This is the most numerous and varied discovery of remains of extinct megafauna, found together, registered so far in the Basin of Mexico INAH archaeologist Alicia Bonfil Olivera said.
Human Bones
Apparently, archaeologists have also found a few human skeletal remains at the excavation site but scientific investigation for confirmation is yet to be done. However, two stone tools found in the excavation suggest that the bones may be of a human.
The characteristics and size of some bones indicate that it is human limbs, which is not surprising because it is known that man lived in central Mexico at that time.
The sediments and sand layer in which the faunal remains were found further indicate that the animals and possibly humans probably were trapped in landslides and got buried in the debris.
If you look at Firestone, et al.’s book, there is a photo of the bed of Lake Michigan. It shows two definite crater formations and probably a third smaller on at the “waist” of the lake. I don’t know if the angles would be enough to explain variations in the orientation of the Carolina bays, but the idea that there were two or three strikes that formed Lake Michigan suggests that there may have been other strikes as well. One could draw sight lines from the Bays to see where some of them converge. Who knows, there may be undiscovered craters out there.
Thanks gleeakin. I suppose there could be any number of causes for this “deposit”. Although I’ve not studied the subject it’s my impression that lahars are generally readily identifiable. Maybe not. We don’t know much about the medium these bones were found in except there was apparently a fair amount of sand. Gravel, ash, charcoal? Splintered and mangled trees? We don’t know yet but I have my suspicions since the timing is coincident with other bone yards around the world where much of this detritus is present.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.