Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Milwaukee gun range voluntarily reports law-abiding customers to local police
Ammoland ^ | August. 2, 2012 | Ammoland

Posted on 08/02/2012 8:45:21 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

bookmark for follow up


61 posted on 08/03/2012 1:44:39 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sean327

I know the range well, used to work at YPG. Met my wife in Yuma, bought her her first gun, a pistol, and she went to the range every morning before it got hot. Loved working there, every day was an adventure. Especially Miners Camp, where we stopped on our way back to town. The bartender, Shirley,knew more jokes than I can remember. Good memories.


62 posted on 08/03/2012 3:43:44 PM PDT by gunner03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
In this time over 25,000 customer names were reported to West Milwaukee Police Chief Dennis Nasci who ran a background check on each through “his system”.



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!

63 posted on 08/03/2012 4:16:19 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

I smell a VERY expensive lawsuit brewing here... Against the City of Milwaukee, the Police Department, AND the business owner.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

And it should be filed against each of them, and the suit against the city and PD should be combined and make the police pension fund as culpable, and not the taxpayers.

Any gun range owner who uses his customers as bait without disclosing it needs sued big time too.


64 posted on 08/03/2012 4:55:42 PM PDT by apoliticalone (Honest govt. that operates in the interest of US sovereignty and the people, not global $$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I have not taken the time to read all of the comments on this thread. However, what the cops are doing is illegal. And I would bet that if someone were to seek counsel, they’d have a pretty good law suit against the ranges.

Can’t run a criminal history on someone without cause(ie...needed as part of an investigation) or consent of the person. I doubt any of that happened here.

Cops are so damned dumb. And they wonder why people distrust them so much.


65 posted on 08/03/2012 5:29:06 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I have not taken the time to read all of the comments on this thread. However, what the cops are doing is illegal. And I would bet that if someone were to seek counsel, they’d have a pretty good law suit against the ranges and the cops.

Can’t run a criminal history on someone without cause(ie...needed as part of an investigation) or consent of the person. I doubt any of that happened here.

Cops are so damned dumb. And they wonder why people distrust them so much.


66 posted on 08/03/2012 5:29:27 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I have not taken the time to read all of the comments on this thread. However, what the cops are doing is illegal. And I would bet that if someone were to seek counsel, they’d have a pretty good law suit against the ranges and the cops.

Can’t run a criminal history on someone without cause(ie...needed as part of an investigation) or consent of the person. I doubt any of that happened here.

Cops are so damned dumb. And they wonder why people distrust them so much.


67 posted on 08/03/2012 5:29:27 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozaukeemom

I wish I had some advice for you. I know in Denver when they collected names and plate #s of protesters they eventually had to hand over any and all information collected on the individuals to the people themselves and destroy all records. Unfortunately, IIRC they sued the PD in order to get that done. That’s the only thing I can think of at this point - there is no doubt that your rights were violated. If you know other people who were also customers, then I’d try to get together with them?
Perhaps call a public meeting for everyone who has ever been there, etc??? Definitely call the media if you do put together a meeting. I wonder if there are any lawyers among the group of people whose names were turned in? If I think of other ideas, I’ll definitely write back.


68 posted on 08/03/2012 5:38:45 PM PDT by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

That is why I shoot at a range that only requires a state hunting license of any type and you can go there, out in the country, in the rual area, and shoot away for free! Only sometimes does a ranger come along and ask to see a license. Otherwise, bang away.


69 posted on 08/03/2012 6:06:43 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (You can almost hear the footsteps of Jesus. He is right at the door!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I would never go to that range ever


70 posted on 08/03/2012 6:20:41 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

Hey Bama, great to see you back pinging the list! Thanks!


71 posted on 08/03/2012 7:04:44 PM PDT by zzeeman ("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: PowderMonkey

“It is a federal crime to use the NCIC background check system in the manner described.”

But the agency that would do the prosecuting is run by eric holder.

End of story.


72 posted on 08/03/2012 7:24:36 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard. Because "our" pro-abort, anti-gun socialist is SO much better than theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

I actually intended to ping you to this thread. Glad you found it anyway!


73 posted on 08/03/2012 7:43:10 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Are there very many other places to shoot around there?

_____________________________

I wondeer how many of the other ranges are doing this too.

Man is collecting his own database of owners.


74 posted on 08/03/2012 9:12:44 PM PDT by Chickensoup (STOP The Great O-ppression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

I’ve never been to a shooting range where they ask for any kind of personal information.


75 posted on 08/03/2012 9:44:19 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

I take that back. You do have to sign a release form at some ranges, so I guess they do have some basic info. I don’t remember anyone ever asking for a driver’s license number or anything like that though. The outdoor range that I usually go to doesn’t require you to sign a release form or anything else.


76 posted on 08/03/2012 9:51:12 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY; Travis McGee

It’s likely that firearms stores in nearly every locale are doing the same for their local police customers and others. Local government customers receive federal funding and spend big bucks. Local vendors are probably also afraid of neglecting to be the eyes and ears of their political/regulator class.

Most voters with higher incomes and time for politics get their incomes directly or indirectly from government. We’re witnessing one of the many strange associations in a debt regime.


77 posted on 08/04/2012 3:59:46 PM PDT by familyop ("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY; Travis McGee

BTW, during the ‘90s, I personally saw bulletins (from a federal agency) warning that running background checks on residents who exhibited no suspicious behavior was a serious crime. Dispatchers sneered and scoffed at it.


78 posted on 08/04/2012 4:04:14 PM PDT by familyop ("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: ozaukeemom

Those three states you haven’t visited? DON’T GO!


79 posted on 08/05/2012 9:27:02 AM PDT by Terry Mross (To my kin & former friends: Don't contact me if you still love obama- We got nothing to talk about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

lol No reason to, really, but.....

Still trying to figure what, if anything to do in regards to this.


80 posted on 08/05/2012 9:39:17 AM PDT by ozaukeemom (Will there even be an election in 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson