Romney Lacks "Skills To Be Able To Be Commander In Chief" (DWS)

RCP Video ^ | 7-29-2012

[Sir Napsalot]

"I think he's demonstrated pretty repeatedly since he's been out of the country that he lacks the experience, he lacks the preparation and the diplomatic skills to be able to be the commander in chief; to be able to be the president of the United States," DNC chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz said on "Face the Nation" today.

.....

[FormerRep]

No one asked you to vote for anyone. If you would like to shout your opinions from your roof top, by all means, do so. But don’t come here and insult the rest of us.

If you want to throw an anti-Romney tantrum there are plenty of capital D site that would welcome you.

[Jim Robinson]

Her posts look fine to me.

[Jim Robinson]

Please review Romney’s record and positions he’s advocated for during the majority of his life then tell me where he’s any different than the Democrats.

[FormerRep]

Jim, thanks for taking a moment to weigh in. I know you’re no fan of Romney - he’s flawed to be sure - but given the choice of the two, he’s the only option. Thanks again.

[Tennessee Nana]

Thank you Jim

:)

[Jim Robinson]

Abortionism, homosexualism, statism, etc, is never an option if you believe in Life and Liberty!

[sport]

I have come to the conclusion that he is not. As far as anyone voting for either for what they are for or against, one could easily vote for either candidate. I understand that Romney says what the “Conservatives” want to hear him say and some intrephet what he says into what they want him to say. One is partially black. The other is white. One is a muslim. One is a Mormom. But that is the basically difference.

[Republican Wildcat]

Good grief !!! You RomneyBots are that afraid of us Conservatives ??? Your boy Wee Willie is that desparate and insecure that he wants to deny me my Constitutional right to vote ??? WOW IF your boy Wee Willie Mitty ever got into the White House he would be a worse Communist dictator than Obama... at least Obama has not stopped me from voting...

You seem to have a history of defending Obama against any criticism in your posting history and even make comments halfway complementary of him. Now you accuse Romney of being a "communist dictator" and we need to keep him out and Obama in as preferable and that Romney is trying to take away your right to vote - all in quite juvenile tone and language. Please post some hard, credible evidence that Romney is trying to take away your right to vote to substantiate these latest wild accusations you have made against him.

[CodeToad]

The barking dog thinks Obama had skills prior to his taking office? Maybe the barking dog is claiming Obama was a mistake.

[Jim Robinson]

Please list where she defends Obama in anything.

[FormerRep]

It’s one - the other - or stay home. With limited options we have to move down the list from moral issues to governance - I would prefer a Romney - with a conservative house and senate - over an Obama - working in opposition to a conservative house and senate.

[Jim Robinson]

Well, I’m not staying home, but I’m not voting for no damned abortionist/homosexualist statist either. I will not cast a vote for the chief architect of ObamaCare (Mitt Romney)!! I’ll be voting straight conservative!!

[FormerRep]

No pun intended?

[Republican Wildcat]

It would appear she just did in what I just responded to where she claims he would be preferable and would not take away her right to vote vs. Romney who supposedly wants to take it away. I also just responded to a comment on another article where she defends him against Romney for "criticizing our president" overseas - while leaving out where she excerpts the article before her comments that Romney gave the interview to the publication before going to Israel, not while he was there.

Criticizing Romney is one thing...just doing it for the sake of doing so is another...even attacking him for being critical of Obama's policies. If one doesn't believe or trust Romney is being sincere that's their right to do so...adding or removing details is not. Now in this case we have a charge that Obama is greater defending of voting rights and that Romney will be a "worse communist dictator" than Obama and wants to take away the rights of people to vote - that's a charge, in my opinion (you are of course free to disagree...this is your house where I am a guest), that needs to be substantiated with something other than just posting it - where is the evidence for this kind of a charge?

[Jim Robinson]

Got a link?

[xsmommy]

Really a way to encourage those of us who are voting for Romney to whip out our checkbooks for a Freepathon, don’t you think? Rag on those from whom you are soliciting donations works every time./sarcasm
Because of course, we aren’t REALLY conservatives.

[FormerRep]

Directed at me?

[xsmommy]

not at all, i’m chiming in on your side of this. i think it’s ill advised that there are those who are denigrating and demeaning the conservatism of those of us who are voting ABO, while soliciting our $ for a freepathon. Don’t tell me that i am not REALLY a conservative for voting MY conscience, while asking me to help maintain the viability of this site.

[FormerRep]

Glad to hear. No one here should be attacked for honest debate. We are in it together and it’s up to us to win back this Republic. If we have to do it incrementally - the way the leftists have been destroying it - so be it. Every step toward that, however small, is a good thing.

[xsmommy]

i think they are misguided [those who continue to incessantly harangue against our nominee], but i would never demean their conservatism, and i cannot understand why we are not extended the same courtesy. in light of the fundraising aspect that is going on, it seems even more counterproductive, than just insulting.