Replies

It would appear she just did in what I just responded to where she claims he would be preferable and would not take away her right to vote vs. Romney who supposedly wants to take it away. I also just responded to a comment on another article where she defends him against Romney for "criticizing our president" overseas - while leaving out where she excerpts the article before her comments that Romney gave the interview to the publication before going to Israel, not while he was there.

Criticizing Romney is one thing...just doing it for the sake of doing so is another...even attacking him for being critical of Obama's policies. If one doesn't believe or trust Romney is being sincere that's their right to do so...adding or removing details is not. Now in this case we have a charge that Obama is greater defending of voting rights and that Romney will be a "worse communist dictator" than Obama and wants to take away the rights of people to vote - that's a charge, in my opinion (you are of course free to disagree...this is your house where I am a guest), that needs to be substantiated with something other than just posting it - where is the evidence for this kind of a charge?