1 posted on
07/17/2012 5:12:11 AM PDT by
xzins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: P-Marlowe; cripplecreek; cva66snipe; Elvina; Finny; greyfoxx39; Hilda; ImpBill; kabar; mkjessup; ...
2 posted on
07/17/2012 5:13:22 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
To: xzins
3 posted on
07/17/2012 5:14:09 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Roger Taney? Not a bad Chief Justice. John Roberts? A really awful Chief Justice.)
To: xzins
4 posted on
07/17/2012 5:15:05 AM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: xzins
Bobby Jindal. Super smart conservative with the executive experience to be successful.
To: xzins
7 posted on
07/17/2012 5:16:40 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(Every human spent about half an hour as a single cell)
To: xzins
Walker or Jindal. Boy highly accomplished chief executives.
8 posted on
07/17/2012 5:17:13 AM PDT by
ilgipper
( November cannot come soon enough)
To: xzins
To: xzins
![](http://mcguff1.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/palinwaves1.jpg)
All she has to say is yes and I'll follow her anywhere it takes me.
11 posted on
07/17/2012 5:18:11 AM PDT by
McGruff
(Support your local Republican candidates. They are our last line of defense.)
To: xzins
As an aside, I’ve found that a better pro-life term is “prenatal” or “gestate” child. I think it sounds better than pre-born or unborn.
As for who to replace Romney.
No point in indulging in such a fantasy at this time.
Allen West would be my top choice. I don’t care if people think he’s unrefined. I don’t like metrosexuals. They don’t know how to capture and hold ground. West does.
Jindal, if he’s pro-life, but I don’t know if he’s as much a fighter as West.
14 posted on
07/17/2012 5:20:47 AM PDT by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
To: xzins
"Dere vill be no substitutions!!! Romney - he iss de chosen one, yes?"
![](http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSWeS875V9_kO8W2rWbf9Tkqmk7jRhRP2ynkaSmKWLAzfyMqy3JGheSPWIHQw)
To: xzins
You need to change the criteria. I want to hear the name of someone who has not already said no.
Why should we nominate Palin after she refused to run? Is she a special case that she did not have to get out there and make her case? I don't want to hear any conspiracy theories. Palin doesn't consider herself a victim, do not make her into one.
Don't get me wrong, I like Palin, in fact I was one of the very first people here on FR to get behind her in 2008 BEFORE she was nominated.
17 posted on
07/17/2012 5:21:38 AM PDT by
Perdogg
(Let's leave reading things in the Constitution that aren't there to liberals and Dems)
To: xzins
18 posted on
07/17/2012 5:23:20 AM PDT by
umgud
(No Rats, No Rino's)
To: xzins
19 posted on
07/17/2012 5:23:38 AM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
To: xzins
How about someone ELIGIBLE who did NOT INVENT DEATH PANELS?
That only leaves about 40 million conservatives.
![](http://i.imgur.com/GzGFz.jpg)
![](http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/04/10/us/10romney01/10romney01-popup.jpg)
20 posted on
07/17/2012 5:24:21 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
To: xzins
Sarah Palin, without question.
25 posted on
07/17/2012 5:26:13 AM PDT by
Howie66
(I can see November (2012) from my house.)
To: xzins
Thank You so much for providing the LMSM with its next talking point about how weak Mitt's support is.
The time of dream died when Roberts’ Court said ObamaCare was Constitutional. Even Roberts told us that We the electorate is the only thing to save the Republic because the Court system sure will not.
Stop dreaming and start ACTING.
Flame off!
26 posted on
07/17/2012 5:26:56 AM PDT by
Nip
(TANSTAAFL and BOHICA)
To: xzins
Yep, a lot of things would be different if we could all fart wish-granting angels riding unicorns.
30 posted on
07/17/2012 5:30:45 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: xzins
Palin,Cain,West or Walker.
31 posted on
07/17/2012 5:31:00 AM PDT by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
To: xzins
And, don’t forget Romney was aided by out and out fraud in Virginia undertaken by his Rombots. All of those guys have to be excluded, as does Romney ~ who failed to object
32 posted on
07/17/2012 5:31:23 AM PDT by
muawiyah
To: xzins
I really don't see what is to be gained by wishing for an alternative in Tampa. I don't see it happening.
Seriously, look at FR - we're tearing each other apart over Romney. The GOP-E at this point probably sees a Romney win in November as icing on the cake of having set the conservative movement upon itself. Why on Earth would they go along with taking out the guy making all this possible?
Now, if Romney wins in November, the conservative base will be so fractured that it might not be able to coalesce back into an effective resistance against RINO socialism and as a means to nominate effective Tea Party alternatives in the 2014 primaries. If 2012 is any indication, we'll shred our own and open the door for the RINO to win the primary.
Can we please realize that the 2012 presidential elections basically are very bad news, no matter who wins between Romney and Obama, that short of something horrific happening to Romney that there is no way he will not be the nominee, and that our battle is to push as many conservatives over the line in down-ticket races?
33 posted on
07/17/2012 5:31:38 AM PDT by
dirtboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson