Posting the address of TruBlueRinos.com for those FReepers who can no longer stomach FR

[Jim Robinson]

Received yet another FReepmail message regarding the underground campaign to get disgruntled freepers to move on over to the latest anti-freeper site.

I'll save them the trouble of having their moles to do their underhanded dirty work underground.

If you're totally fed up with me and my absolute refusal to support the GOP-e's outright plunge into supporting the progressive/statist agenda and no longer wish to resist tyranny, please by all means go join the RINO squishes over on TrueBlueRINOS.com ( actual address: http://www.trueblueliberty.com ).

But when you join them, please do us all favor and don't come back. It'll save us all a bunch of grief.

Thanks for the memories. It was fun working with you when we all agreed on our pro-God, pro-Life, pro-family, pro-small government, pro-liberty causes.

By the way, those caught continuing their underground campaigns against FR will be zot on sight.

Like this guy:

-------------------------------------------------------

From Pasadena2k | 07/10/2012 1:22:46 PM PDT new

try a site at which it’s OK to discuss alternatives to Obama at least for a short period during this presidential elction season.

Many of us ( over 550 in the last two months ) spend some of our time at trueblueliberty.com

-------------------------------------------------------

Goodbye, Pasadena, we hardly knew ye.

No one appreciates moles. Filthy animals.

[Little Bill]

My family were Puritans and they did like cake.

[icwhatudo]

From Pasadena2k | 07/10/2012 1:22:46 PM PDT new

try a site at which it’s OK to discuss alternatives to Obama at least for a short period during this presidential elction season.

Many of us ( over 550 in the last two months ) spend some of our time at trueblueliberty.com

---------------------------------------------------

The site has threads as far back as Sept 2011.... I have a feeling his numbers may be off.

[Lazamataz]

have reluctantly decided to vote for Romney, but I won’t begrudge anyone who decides to vote their conscience....

There ya go. That's the sort of give and take FR can do, on the individual level.

I'm lucky I don't need to make that choice. I understand if you need to make yours....

[onyx]

B T T T ! ! ! ©

[Earthdweller]

ROTFL!!! OMG! Bwahahaha!

[cripplecreek]

Rush Goes On the Record with Fox News Channel's Greta Van Susteren

VAN SUSTEREN: Why has Governor Mitt Romney not had a so-called "surge"? We hear "surge" used with basically every Republican nominee, but you don't see that "surge" with Governor Romney.

RUSH: Well, every poll I've seen of Republican primary voters, he can't crack 30 percent. It has been curious. And you look at it from the reverse, 70 percent of Republican voters want somebody else. This is why we have the phenomenon of the "Not-Romney." Bachmann was the "Not-Romney" for a while. Herman Cain was the "Not-Romney." Now Newt is the "Not-Romney." I think it boils down to something that's not complicated at all. Republican primary voters are conservative. They don't believe that Romney is. They believe that he will stick a finger in the air and moisten it and see which way the winds are blowing and try to get in that direction. They remember that Romney said he believes in global warming and he believes that man is causing it. Well, conservatives don't believe that. They believe it's a hoax. Conservatives know that the whole story of man-made global warming is a hoax. And they're not going to get excited by a candidate who is trying to gain favor with non-Republican primary voters by articulating that stuff.

Here's the big problem, Greta, for the Republicans. And I am a lone wolf on this. The rule of thumb in elections, both parties, 40 percent are going to vote Democrat automatically, whatever you do, 40 percent are going to vote Republican, automatic, no matter what you do. And in the middle, who do we have? The precious, God love them, independents and the moderates. And they are the targets. They are the focus of every election. And our brilliant campaign consultants tell our candidates they are the ones that know how to go get a majority of those independents. And we have, as Republicans, put ourselves in prison to this whole silly notion that you only win elections by moving to the center and getting great independents. Fine and dandy, but if you squander your base in the process, you haven't a prayer.

The Republican Party is trying to do something in this primary that is unprecedented. They're trying to split the conservative vote and win the primary with a moderate, with Romney. It's the other way around. You consolidate your base and then you move to the center in the general. The Republican establishment has decided they don't want any part of conservatism. And this is really not new. People are surprised to hear this, but the Republican Party formative event with conservatism is Goldwater's landslide defeat. That's what they think of when they think conservative. They don't think Reagan. They think Goldwater.

They believe what the inside-the-Beltway philosophy is about conservatives. They're racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe, Southern hayseed hicks. They're pro-lifers. They're embarrassing to have to go to the convention with them. And they're just embarrassed to have those kind of people in the party. They're dumb. They're not erudite. They're not educated in Ivy League schools. We'll take their votes on election day, but we really don't want to hang around with them. We don't want anybody in Washington thinking that we're really that close to them and aligned with them. So in the process -- you know, it's a very sophisticated electorate. The Republican primary voter can sense that the Republican Party really doesn't like them, really doesn't want them, thinks that they are the route to defeat. That's the problem in a nutshell. The Republican establishment thinks that a conservative nominee is the route to defeat because they think Goldwater landslides are going to happen because they believe what the popular misconception the left has created of conservatives.

[APatientMan]

Thank you, Sir.

IMHO, it’s time to call off the truce with the Romneybots, too. They’re willing to vote for a gun-grabbing, homo-marriage backer who created a socialist health-care system and made abortion available for fifty bucks.

They can all KMA.

[muawiyah]

Just cut out the leftover Clown Possee stuff and you’ll be OK.

[Jim Robinson]

Look, the antifreepers have an underground mole campaign going on. Might as well shine the light of day on it. Moles are filthy, nasty, destructive pests and need to be exterminated before they destroy your property (or liberty). Don't look now, yam, but your front teeth are growing.

Moles/trolls are zot on sight.

Your current efforts are much better suited elsewhere.

[OneVike]

There is but one place on the WWW that conservatives can know is and always will be conservative. That would be FR.

I could not imagine, a world where I did not come to FR at least once a day to see what is going on in the world.

When that day comes for me, it will be because I am no longer a member of the human race.

I will instead have finally gone home to my Lord to take up residence in the home Christ has prepared ahead of time for me.

[MountainDad]

Freepers on this site have educated me beyond belief and helped me through my sons' deployments.

The thought of going to some amature, cry-baby site sickens me.

I never stab my FRiends in the back!

I'm stayin' right here!

[RedMDer]

WOO-HOO!
BTTT!

[Windflier]

"Republican moderates are guaranteed losers in eight out of ten elections you're gonna have."
~ Rush Limbaugh

So why did Rush expend so much CO² pimping the Romney vote today?

[Cyber Liberty]

I looked at it recently (you had a Quix thread going), when "Cyber Liberty" gave me google hits there. Funny, I can't view the pages popped up by Google...I don't have access. Well, I don't think I'll be going through whatever it takes to get access..LOL!

[GGpaX4DumpedTea]

“People are surprised to hear this, but the Republican Party formative event with conservatism is Goldwater’s landslide defeat. That’s what they think of when they think conservative. They don’t think Reagan. They think Goldwater.”

The Republican Party’s landslide defeat with Rino-ism came in 1948...Dewey was that candidate. Truman would have been beatable with a good, conservative Republican candidate who knew how to campaign effectively, and not just sit back and believe the pollsters who were telling Dewey he had it in the bag. Even Dewey could have won if he had been a good campaigner.

Let’s not let 2012 be a repeat of 1948! The stakes are much higher today...and btw, by today’s standards, Truman would not be a bad candidate for the Republicans now...or maybe JFK...likely somewhat less to the left than is Romney.

[Aria]

I’m voting for Romeny because of Obamacare...that I believe will be the death of me someday. Don’t see what choice we have if we want to get rid of the monster.

Yeah, he isn’t perfect and I’d do anything to vote for Sarah...but that isn’t reality - at least for now.

[dfwgator]

“People are surprised to hear this, but the Republican Party formative event with conservatism is Goldwater’s landslide defeat

I wonder if not for JFK's assassination how that election would have gone....at the time of his death, JFK wasn't exactly lighting up the polls.

[cripplecreek]

I’m not voting for Romney.

Period.

[manc]

It shows how childish or attention seeking some people are when they complain about a site and yet can’t just leave unless they make a statement.

Keep up the good work Jim and thanks for providing a place for us conservatives to come to.

[colorado tanker]

LOL!