• RomneyCare Covers Abortions.
• Mitt & Ann Romney: Planned Parenthood Donors
• Abortions now FREE under RomneyCare.
Romney is definitely not my first choice but I was encouraged to see this article by Dr. John Willke.
Interesting brief image about Barbara Bush and her knitting. She remained pro-abortion, but evidently she stuck to her knitting while in the White House and refrained from saying anything.
No. Are you going to vote for barry by not voting?
Is this the original Dr Wilke from 30+ years ago ???
or his son ???
The Dr Wilke then was just about THE authority on exposing abortion...
Ted Kennedy went from pro life to pro choice because he saw which way the political winds were blowing in the Democratic party.
George H.W. Bush went towards the pro life position because he thought it was advantageous politically in the Republican party.
Mitt Romney advocated a pro choice position while running in liberal Massachusetts and a pro life position which running in the Republican primary.
I don’t believe any of those men had strong feelings either way, they simply adopted the position the would confer the most political advantage to them.
When he makes claims like “I was never pro-choice” and “Every decision I made in MA came down on the side of life”, it is clear he is lying through his teeth.
To the extent Romney has any real conviction on the subject, I have no doubt he is still “pro-choice”. The best we can hope for with Romney is that he doesn't really care about “abortion rights” OR the lives of the unborn and will support pro-life positions, as long as it is politically expedient to do so.
If Romney is elected, pro-lifer’s will need to keep enormous pressure on Romney to live up to his “pro-life” claims and be careful NEVER to trust him on issues of life, especially when it come to Supreme Court nominees.
So a doctor calls the president "Mr." but the president calls a doctor by a title?
And you wonder why I bring up medical arrogance?
• RomneyCare Covers Abortions.
• Mitt & Ann Romney: Planned Parenthood Donors
• Abortions now FREE under RomneyCare.
Willard is and will always be a pathological liar. Period.
In brief, here’s Romney’s record, ending with the 4th time
for abortion so NO actions on his part to show he is for
life. Did Romney ever “act” for life?
- pro-choice in ‘94; pro-life in ‘01; choice ‘02; pro-life ‘04; choice ‘05; life in ‘06; then funded abortion in ‘06
I would call this, the record of a habitual liar.
Pray for Mitt’s conversion, Mormons are not Christian.
I dont know if Romney’s conversion is legit or not. He could have really had a change of heart, which would be great. He could be just moving to the pro life side to get elected, which means he’ll probably stay there throughout a first term if that was the case). Or he could be a complete and total liar, and will be just as pro choice as he has always been from the second he takes the oath, and preform the proceedure himself in the west wing on alternate Tuesdays.
One thing I am 100% sure of is Obama’s position on abortion is, and that it hasn’t changed. He is for free and total legalized abortion, regardless of how the woman got pregnant, how far she is into the pregnancy, the age of the woman/girl involved. Obama is for abortion on demand. Period. And he isn’t denying any of it. In fact, he’d wear it as a badge of honor if you asked him.
I can understand being skeptical of Romney. I sure am. I dont know the Dr’s in the article (a little before my time). I sure want a president that is against abortion except in extreme cases (rape, life of mother, etc...). But I just dont see how this issue would make up anyone’s mind to vote against Romney, considering who his opponent is.
If you are one of the folks that in good conscience cant vote for either overall, then as I’ve said before, while I dont agree with you, I understand and respect your right to that position. But if you’re someone for whom abortion is issue #1, then this seems to be a choice between a chance (albeit slight) and no chance.
On the Romney campaign site, to this day, his own words prove that he is not in any true sense pro-life.
Pro-life means that you stand in agreement with the self-evident truths of the Declaration of Independence, that our individual right to life comes from God, not from any man, and that that sacred right is therefore unalienable.
Romney’s default position, as stated currently, is that whether or not to kill babies is up to the courts. In other words, the practical outcome of his default position is abortion on demand. He calls that “law,” just like he has since he tried to run to the left of Teddy Kennedy for the U.S. Senate in the early nineties. No flip-flopping on this core position for him, no-sir-ee. He is a completely unreconstructed judicial supremacist, in other words anti-republican.
His secondary position is that whether or not to kill babies should have been left up to a majority vote of the people. That is by definition a pro-choice democrat position. One that denies the self-evident truths of the founding of this free republic.
His last and most ridiculous position is a Stephen A. Douglas democrat position if there ever was one, which is that it should be left up to the states whether or not to butcher helpless, defenseless little boys and girls.
Of course the whole package is wrapped up in a thin tissue of pro-life sounding lies, but that is, at its core, where he says he stands, right now.
Romney authentic?
How many times has he flip-flopped on this issue alone?
 |
Life Jewels (Listen) A collection of One Minute Pro-Life messages. A different message each time you click. |
