Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hocndoc

I dont know if Romney’s conversion is legit or not. He could have really had a change of heart, which would be great. He could be just moving to the pro life side to get elected, which means he’ll probably stay there throughout a first term if that was the case). Or he could be a complete and total liar, and will be just as pro choice as he has always been from the second he takes the oath, and preform the proceedure himself in the west wing on alternate Tuesdays.

One thing I am 100% sure of is Obama’s position on abortion is, and that it hasn’t changed. He is for free and total legalized abortion, regardless of how the woman got pregnant, how far she is into the pregnancy, the age of the woman/girl involved. Obama is for abortion on demand. Period. And he isn’t denying any of it. In fact, he’d wear it as a badge of honor if you asked him.

I can understand being skeptical of Romney. I sure am. I dont know the Dr’s in the article (a little before my time). I sure want a president that is against abortion except in extreme cases (rape, life of mother, etc...). But I just dont see how this issue would make up anyone’s mind to vote against Romney, considering who his opponent is.

If you are one of the folks that in good conscience cant vote for either overall, then as I’ve said before, while I dont agree with you, I understand and respect your right to that position. But if you’re someone for whom abortion is issue #1, then this seems to be a choice between a chance (albeit slight) and no chance.


44 posted on 06/20/2012 3:59:49 PM PDT by SoCalTransplant (Honey badger's level of concern is negligible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SoCalTransplant; fieldmarshaldj
As to your last paragraph, we are called to God's children and servants not God's oddsmakers or bookies. No pro-lifer can vote for either of these monsters.

Just wait until Myth appoints Margaret Sanger's feminazi great grand daughter to SCOTUS and then Myth goes on autobabble as to how terribly disappointed he is in her SCOTUS voting record (this is not an actual person but is a good approximation of what appeals to Myth).

The candidates are Caligula and Diocletian. Caligula is known to be a rank lunatic and Diocletian is a pious pagan and Roman traditionalist (and total power freak who executes people for violating price control laws as well as for being Christians). Whom to choose? Whom to choose? How about neither? BTW, the pious megalomaniac Diocletian killed a hell of a lot more Christians before resigning in a huff because no matter how many he killed, the people would STILL not obey him. Constantine won the war of succession while still a pagan in the Battle at the Milvian Bridge and, converted by a vision of the Cross with the words In Hoc Signo Vinces (in this sign, you will conquer) made Christianity the religion of the Empire as Diocletian went off to Aquila to tend his roses.

Not Caligula. Not Diocletian. Not Obozo. Not Romney.

61 posted on 06/20/2012 9:48:46 PM PDT by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey! Tom Hoefling for POTUS! Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson