Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Queen homophobic?
Scoop World ^ | Saturday, 2 June 2012 | Peter Tatchell

Posted on 06/03/2012 2:43:31 PM PDT by presidio9

"Not once in her 60-year reign has the Queen publicly acknowledged the existence of the gay community - or gay members of her own royal family. She has never supported or visited a gay charity. Although she is a patron of many good causes, none of them are gay or serve the gay community. The words 'gay' and 'lesbian' have never publicly passed her lips," said human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell, Director of the human rights advocacy organisation, the Peter Tatchell Foundation.

He was speaking in the run-up to this weekend's Diamond Jubilee celebrations in Britain, which commemorate Elizabeth II's 60 years on the throne.

"Even when she announced government plans for gay law reform in her Queen's Speeches to parliament, she did not use the words lesbian or gay. Apparently, mentioning gay people is beneath the dignity of the monarch," he added.

"While she has spoken approvingly of the UK's many races and faiths, for six decades the Queen has ignored lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Britons. If she treated black and Asian Britons in the same way, she'd be denounced as a racist. Why the double standards?

"Whereas most of us now welcome and embrace gay people, the Queen has never done so.

"As our head of state, Elizabeth II is supposed to represent and embrace all British people, not just some. How much longer will the LGBT community have to wait for royal recognition and acceptance?

"There is solid evidence of regal prejudice. Gay staff in the Royal Household used to be banned from bringing their partners to the annual Christmas Ball at Buckingham Palace; whereas heterosexual staff were always invited to attend with their partners. This homophobic discrimination was exposed by the LGBT human rights group OutRage! in 1995. It was only after a protest outside the palace and the ensuing bad publicity that the royals dropped the ban.

"When there are major tragedies involving the loss of life, the Queen often visits the site and the victims in hospital. This did not happen when neo-Nazi, David Copeland, bombed the Admiral Duncan gay pub in Soho, London, in 1999, killing three people and wounding 70 others. At the time, it was the worst terrorist outrage in mainland Britain for many years. To most people's surprise, the Queen did not visit the bombed-out pub or the hospitalised victims.

"Defenders of the monarchy point out that many royal staff are gay men. This is true. So what? Having gay staff wait hand and foot on the Queen is proof of nothing, apart from the fact that she likes well-mannered, well-groomed male servants. It's the equivalent of rich racists claiming that they can't be racist because they employ black staff to clean their homes and cook their meals.

"Ever since the public relations blunders at the time of Princess Diana's death, the Queen has gone to great lengths to be more in touch with the mood of country. She presents the monarchy as modern, compassionate and inclusive; often referring to the value of a diverse multicultural, multifaith society.

"On gay issues, however, she remains curiously out of step with public opinion. While I doubt that Elizabeth II is a hard-core homophobe, she certainly doesn't appear to be gay-sympathetic," said Mr Tatchell.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; kenyanbornmuzzie; lgbt; queenhatesqueens; swrdswllwngsdshw; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: Tijeras_Slim

*rimshot*


81 posted on 06/03/2012 8:12:22 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

My mother who died last year bore a striking likeness to Queen
Liz in their younger years. Mom could be described as homo-
phobic. My 88 yr old WWII combat wounded paratrooper dad
could also be described as homophobic as could most all of his
pals. Generational thing at work here? Ya think?


82 posted on 06/03/2012 9:07:47 PM PDT by Sivad (NorCal Red Turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sivad

Just about everybody and everything was “homophobic” until the last 20 years.

Being happy that you were raised by your father and mother is, of course, “homophobic”. Reading the Bible and attending church is “homophobic”. Being happy if your son marries a woman and if your daughter marries a man is “homophobic.” Basically any disagreement with a homosexual person about absolutely anything is now “homophobic.” Kind of like disagreeing with B. Hussein Obama about anything is “racist.”


83 posted on 06/03/2012 10:18:50 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

In the PC world of today you are com-
pletely right. And, if the conversation
is of a political nature and with a liberal
opponent then the PC is all the more
thicker.


84 posted on 06/04/2012 12:02:33 AM PDT by Sivad (NorCal Red Turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; wagglebee; Gamecock; Lee N. Field

Man, now the gays want to pillorise the queen for not mentioning gays? They don’t want equality, they want domination...


85 posted on 06/04/2012 2:06:04 AM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
According to The Queen's website, she supports a total of 621 charities. Having read through a significant portion of the list, it's clear than gay people benefit from many of these charities in proportion to their representation in the population. Apparently their complaint is that she doesn't discriminate against heterosexuals by supporting gay-only charities.
86 posted on 06/04/2012 7:02:41 AM PDT by Pollster1 (A boy becomes a man when a man is needed - John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Everyone should follow the Queen’s example. Ignore evil, unless it is in your face; then fight it.


87 posted on 06/04/2012 8:48:16 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower

There can never be enough validation, because all the validation in the world wouldn’t make right what even they know, deep down, is abominably wrong. “Let God be true, and every man a liar”


88 posted on 06/04/2012 9:33:02 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson