They can all get married. just not to each other.
At one time--and not a long time ago--the civil union was supposed to be the answer to their "prayers." Now nothing will do except a massive church wedding with the bride(s) dressed in white. Somebody needs to do a quick review of the Tale of the Fisherman's Wife.
The Supreme Court is going to have to rule on this homo “marriage” issue sooner or later. That’s why Definition of Marriage needs to become a constitutional amendment.
Government needs to spend trillions so science can make it possible for gays to conceive.
At the very least they should make it impossible for hetrosexuals to conceive. Just to be fair.
Its a matter of Civil Rights.
Can’t they just live together and be happy.
The ‘right to marry’ ???
I don't recall marriage being a US constitutional right. In fact don't recall serving in the military being a constitutional right either. Where is that found in the US constitution? The ERA amendment failed to get passed.
Remember in the late 1970s when libs claimed the ERA would NOT create a right to Same-sex marriage? Now they claim it's been there all along anyway without ERA.
Not true. They can get married. Marriage = union of one man and one woman. The union they want, two men or two women, is not marriage.
And I love my new Fender guitar can I marry it? In fact I love my two newest Fender guitars so can I marry both of them? And yeah I already have a wife, a real woman no less, but that's irrelevant, right. The *goal* is for me to be happy, correct (you putz).
Plus these two guitars are different 'colors' so they're minorities and you can't discriminate on that. (where's my friggen lawyer I'm suing!) I'm In Looooove Mr Orr!
:-)
From the CBS story,
he lead plaintiffs, Chicago Police Detective Tanya Lazaro and software analyst Liz Matos, believe the civil unions that became legal in Illinois last year are insufficient.
“It sends a powerful message that these loving relationships are inadequate and undeserving,” said John Knight, the ACLU’s Director of LGBT and AIDS projects.
http://tinyurl.com/cpfeop3 [This link likely short-lived and volatile, since it's a TV-news story.]
Uh, yeah, John, that would be correct.
This is the legal attack Lambda has been preparing for, for over 20 years. This is the big one. This is the one that destroys marriage and removes its solid evidence of heterosexual normality -- which is what this is all about.
Welcome to socialist realism in the world of law.
So besides being perverts these people are idiots?
Sue based on what?
They have no “right” to be legally married.
You can’t marry your sister, you can’t marry a child, you can’t marry a dog.
The more I consider this the better this news is. Opening this up gives us a chance to revisit the APA’s decision in 1972/73 to remove homosexuality from the DSM. It was done politically without a shred of science to back it up.
Let conservative bloggers discuss and debate this. Let the truth come out. What the opposition will do is relate any discussion of the psychological aspect of homosexual behavior to homosexual repression. They’ll mention how many societies jail or even execute homosexuals.
Those societies happen to be repressive socialist tyrannies or repressive Moslem tyrannies. This works out to a double win for us. Homosexuality can and should be treatedas a mental illness. We don’t jail manic depressives or hypochondriacs. We treat them and have compassion on them. A cure should be looked for.
We can turn this debate around and we can win.
God says no, the people say no -the government is under BOTH the people and God.
This is how it began in MA, with two lesbians filing a suit to be able to get married. It’s interesting that less than 6 years later, those same two women were the first homosexual couple to file for Divorce.
Sure gays can adopt but that will just lead to them teaching their children their gay way of life, further contributing to the pursuit normalizing homosexuality.