Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will the 1991 Biography Discovery Force Obama to Open the Hood?
American Thinker | 5/26/2012 | Monte Kuligowski

Posted on 05/26/2012 9:15:05 AM PDT by Menehune56

Three possibilities follow the bombshell discovery that Barack Obama was promoted in 1991 through 2007 by his professional agency as an author "born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii." (1) Obama untruthfully presented himself as Kenya-born. (2) Obama untruthfully presents himself as Hawaii-born. (3) Obama had no knowledge that his bio contained the 16-year-old "error" which was corrected in April of 2007, when Obama was gearing up his campaign for the U.S. presidency.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamafamily; truthers; usurper; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
Possibility #3 doesn't pass the laugh test. Ball in Obama's court now.
1 posted on 05/26/2012 9:15:16 AM PDT by Menehune56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

I choose door no. 2.


2 posted on 05/26/2012 9:17:30 AM PDT by Signalman ( November, 2012-The End of an Error)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Link?


3 posted on 05/26/2012 9:18:30 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Imagine if this had been reported during the campaign in 2008 and even more damning Obama’s being stoned through most of his high school and college years. I can’t believe that the Clinton’s didn’t uncover this stuff when Hillary was running.


4 posted on 05/26/2012 9:19:59 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

I vote #1 and it will be ignored.


5 posted on 05/26/2012 9:23:14 AM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Oops!

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/will_the_1991_biography_discovery_force_obama_to_open_the_hood.html

6 posted on 05/26/2012 9:25:30 AM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
I can’t believe that the Clinton’s didn’t uncover this stuff when Hillary was running.

My guess is they did, but my guess is also that the other side also had damning evidence against HRH (Arkancide, batting for the other team, etc.), so there was mutually assured destruction.

7 posted on 05/26/2012 9:28:30 AM PDT by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Eventually it will be confirmed that Obama did indeed supply the bio information himself.


8 posted on 05/26/2012 9:30:10 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Congrats to Ted Kennedy! He's been sober for two years now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56; LucyT; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; ...

Ping...............

To American Thinker article link.


9 posted on 05/26/2012 9:35:28 AM PDT by melancholy (Professor Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist, Ph.D in L0w and H0lder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

agree
only an idiot or a obamite ( but i repeat myself) would believe that for 16 years 0dumbo neer once read his own bio
and of course did not supply the info
even though all other authors at that agency say they supplied their own personal info


10 posted on 05/26/2012 9:36:55 AM PDT by RWGinger (Simpl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
you write . . .

I can’t believe that the Clinton’s didn't’t uncover this stuff when Hillary was running.

Undoubtedly they and McCain campaign knew all this and more . . .

The real question for the sake of truth, not speculation, is WHY did they choose to not allow this and all the other seemingly pertinent information to be spoken of?

What was the purpose to remain silent? What was to be gained to remain silent? What was the risks to making a full frontal attack?

11 posted on 05/26/2012 9:41:02 AM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
I vote #1 and it will be ignored.

I agree. Applying Occam's Razor, I've always believed Obama was born in Hawaii. The Kenyan birth conspiracy, while possible is convoluted and simply defies common sense and reason. But I now believe that as a younger adult, Obama was telling people he was born in Kenya. The question that needs to be explored is why? Was he simply trying to earn "street cred" from liberal academia while writing his unpublished racial identity book? Was he trying to defraud scholarships? There's a serious fire burning here if birthers would get out of the way.

I wonder if there exists a manuscript of Journeys in Black and White. I'd be very curious to read it. And where else did Obama sell himself as Kenyan-born? This is what investigators need to be looking for, not a stupid birth certificate.

And, yes, this will be buried. The publishing house has already fallen on their sword, telling us this was a simple typo of their fault.

12 posted on 05/26/2012 9:46:52 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

#3 is a no go. He’s so narcissistic he probably passed copies of the pamphlet out to everyone he knew and had a dozen tacked on his walls and taped to his fridge.

It’s a toss up on the other two which continues to prove he has told so many lies throughout his life he doesn’t know what the thruth is anymore. Combine that with mind-altering drugs and it’s no wonder he’s been giving speeches about his sons.


13 posted on 05/26/2012 9:47:50 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Here’s the thing...If this was just a “mistake” as the woman who claimed to fact check the Bio, then why did the mistaken “fact” say born in Kenya?

I mean, if it was just a mistake, why not “born in Sweden”, “Born in France” etc. etc.

Kenya just happened to pop up huh?

Well low and behold “some people”, so called “Birthers” had been saying they thought Obama was born in Kenya. Obiviously they are nuts, right? And what coincidence. Right there in Obamas own bio it says, what?

Born in Kenya.

Crazy birthers.........


14 posted on 05/26/2012 9:49:19 AM PDT by saleman (!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
You are right. It is the only option that makes sense. However, I also agree with you that it will be ignored by the MSM.

The birth issue will only become relevant when and if something like school records are released that clearly lists Obama as a foreign student receiving financial aid.

However, I am sure the Chicago mafia has cleaned up all these loose ends, just like they did with the biography in 2007.

15 posted on 05/26/2012 9:52:03 AM PDT by daviscupper (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

Ping for later reading.


16 posted on 05/26/2012 9:58:37 AM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

This, of course, raises the question: Who was the first “birther”? Was it Obama’s publicist, or was it Barack Hussein Obama, II himself? One of them is the originator of the idea that Obama was born in Kenya, not any right-wing wingnut, not any fanatic supporter of Hillary Clinton.


17 posted on 05/26/2012 10:02:43 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

For McCain it’s easy, He was afraid if that item were public knowledge then he might win the election. McCain never did sound like he wanted to win. He just wanted to be the republican nominee. That seems to be some sort of Republican Syndrome. It afflicted Bush I and Dole and McCain and maybe Ford. Romney is showing signs of the malady.


18 posted on 05/26/2012 10:05:51 AM PDT by arthurus ( Read Henry hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

“The publishing house has already fallen on their sword, telling us this was a simple typo of their fault.”

Yeah it was a typo, they did not get the message in 91 that the clown was on a ticket to the white house. More than likely, the dopes that ran this place had no knowledge of the requirement to be a natural born citizen. Along comes 07 and someone finds this little nugget of truth and they decide it needs be excised. One of the few pieces of info that was not scrubbed by the democommie machine and when it was, there were too many copies out in the public to get them all.


19 posted on 05/26/2012 10:06:08 AM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

Seconding what was said upthread, the Clinton’s didn’t want their dirty laundry exposed.
They too could have had their family threatened.


20 posted on 05/26/2012 10:06:14 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson