Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Hand of Clinton in Obama revelations?
American Thinker ^ | May 17, 2012 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 05/18/2012 12:04:59 AM PDT by robowombat

In the age of instant communication Brietbart.com's revelation that Barack Obama was listed on his agent, Jane Dystel's brochure, as having been "born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii" is already old news. This news, however, is simply too hot for the major media to ignore. I would expect Obama spokesman Jay Carney to lay off the "mistake" to some misguided publicist, but that will no longer work. For what this brochure reveals is that, regardless of where Obama was born, he has been manufacturing his biography from the day he hit the mainland. The emergence of this brochure two weeks after David Maraniss's revelation in Vanity Fair about Obama's composite girl friends and one week after the debut of Ed Klein's new book on Obama, The Amateur, suggests some media string-pulling beyond the powers of any conservative. Call me a conspiracy theorist -- a tag that has lost much of its sting in the last few hours -- but I sense the hand of Clinton. The Klein book, for instance, opens with an intimate meeting chez Clinton in which Bill encourages Hillary to do the seemingly unthinkable, namely challenge Obama in 2012. Someone at that meeting was allowed to talk to Klein, probably encouraged to talk to Klein. Indeed, the meeting may have been staged for Klein's benefit.

Read more:

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; naturalborncitizen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Bill and Hil were given notice in 2008 by the Bill Gwatney murder what could happen if they were to try and reveal certain bothersome facts about the Mahdi's personal history. They must be both really consumed by hatred and jealousy and power lust to even think about doing it again.
1 posted on 05/18/2012 12:05:07 AM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: robowombat

Klein was the editor of the New York Times Magazine, so he is no Republican, much less a conservative, despite the fact that Regnery published his book. The name of the book came from Clinton’s description of Obama...Amateur.

I suspect there are many Hillary supporters who were disgusted to the point of voting Republican who are behind a lot of these revelations.

Obama, the DNC, and his union thugs did her in, and her supporters have not forgotten it.


3 posted on 05/18/2012 12:27:21 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (This hobbit is looking for her pitchfork...God help the GOP if I find it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Does anyone here at FR truly believe Hillary Clinton can win this election if nominated at the Democratic Party’s convention?

She won’t be supported by the majority of black voters.


4 posted on 05/18/2012 12:38:51 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
It should never be forgotten that it was the Clintons who gave birth to the "birther" movement.

During the last presidential campaign, in August, 2008, Bill Clinton was asked if he thought Obama was qualified to be president.
Clinton's rather odd, cryptic reply:

"The constitution sets qualification for the president. And then the people decide who they think would be the better president."

Bill Clinton made this reference to the Constitution shortly after America's latest fad, the "community organizer" from Chicago, popped up out of nowhere and stole his wife's destiny by winning, in rather sleazy fashion including the shameless playing of "the race card", the Democrat nomination for President.

It has been my opinion since that time that the Clintons know something, and that it was they who quite deliberately fanned the flames of controversy over Obama's birth. Remember, it was a prominent Hillary Clinton supporter, Philadelphia lawyer Philip Berg, who launched *the first* Obama eligibility lawsuit. That lawsuit was filed in August of 2008, shortly after Bill Clinton made the curious reference to the Constitution when asked if he thought Obama was qualified to be President. Coincidental timing? Sure it was.

5 posted on 05/18/2012 12:41:46 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Feasible. I have been watching the Clintons since 2008 waiting on them to make their move.


6 posted on 05/18/2012 12:49:25 AM PDT by John.Galt2012 (I'll take Liberty and you can keep the "Change"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Hillary Clinton, Alinsky protege, would be no better than Obama. That’s the saddest part of this whole scenario.


7 posted on 05/18/2012 12:56:25 AM PDT by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Any minute now the left is going to realize that Obama is going down hard.

They will turn on him like a pack of hyenas and try to limit damage to the demorat party.

The rats, in their arrogance, drastically underestimated us.

We obviously aren't as stupid as they think, and we don't give up.

I'm watching several other forums, the reversal of opinion is amazing.

8 posted on 05/18/2012 1:09:53 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Obama had almost no chance of winning in November...

Rather than lay it all on the Clinton[s], with my conspiracy hat admittedly on, my suspicions lay with democrat apparatchiks due to party motive. With Gallop saying today that zer0 is likely to lose, zer0 doing poorly in many a poll, zer0 probably doing MUCH worse in the democrat politburo internal polling (ie, REAL non-push polling), there is a threat to the 'rats. The putsch of zer0's first 2 years is losing steam, but this is the best chance in 233 years (since the constitutional convention) to transform the nation. They must know that this relatively brief flirt with pure marxism will leave a mighty distaste for it being voted in anytime in the next 50 years, so to today's travelers, this is the time they have been waiting for - now or never. I think we're looking at a nasty next few months with 'rat factions, exposed with the likes of the Kenyan revelation, battling the zer0/Soros faction, as well as republican - the Rino's trying to win the votes of those that don't care about elections and many conservatives trying to pull Rotney over the finish line just to avoid zer0.

9 posted on 05/18/2012 1:13:21 AM PDT by C210N ("ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate" (Breitbart, 2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeing More Clearly Now

Hillary! would be much worse, and more dangerous to the republic, should they switch horses. There would be the incumbent advantage in 2016 should they win. She’d be just as sneaky agenda-wise, with EVERY move having a thin veneer of goodness and an agenda that moves them Forward©.


10 posted on 05/18/2012 1:20:38 AM PDT by C210N ("ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate" (Breitbart, 2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

“We obviously aren’t as stupid as they think, and we don’t give up.”


We are as stupid as they think. We nominated Mitt Romney.


11 posted on 05/18/2012 1:38:36 AM PDT by RaisingCain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John.Galt2012

I have little doubt that those rumors about the Clinton Administration trying to find an angle to get around the 22nd Amendment were true.


12 posted on 05/18/2012 1:53:53 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

I don’t care whose hand/s are in it...I want this non-citizen removed from office. An office he NEVER should have had by our laws.

Damn those that allowed him to get this far...


13 posted on 05/18/2012 3:02:38 AM PDT by SueRae (The Tower of Sauron falls on 11.06.2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
0bama going down hard has nothing to do with “us” or “we” - like any other organized hit job - what we are watching is an ‘inside job.’
14 posted on 05/18/2012 3:14:54 AM PDT by ResistorSister (Be on your guard; stand firm in the faith; be men of courage; be strong. I Cor. 16:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RaisingCain
Conservatives didn't. Losing a battle doesn't mean we give up on the war.

No mistake about it, conservative activists do have influence if we keep chipping away.

15 posted on 05/18/2012 3:20:27 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Obammy gets about 90 plus percent of the black vote even though
That demographic has suffered worse than any other as a result of
This phoney.
If the dems dump him that percentage will NEVER again be a reliable
Constituancy


16 posted on 05/18/2012 3:26:44 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
Here's to hoping that the epiphany you predict happens later, rather than sooner. The Democrat Party is such a cobbled-together collective of so many single-issue blocs, a 'palace coup' by the Clintons would be akin to stomping on an anthill then pouring water in it - it would take them weeks, if not months, for all the workers in the nest to get back into formation and perform their roles as mandated. A 60-90 day time frame would be impeccable timing. Not to mention a real gas to watch.

"As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their hearts desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."

--H.L. Mencken, The Baltimore Evening Sun, July 26, 1920


17 posted on 05/18/2012 3:32:10 AM PDT by Viking2002 ("Always with the negative waves, Moriarty, always with the negative waves!" - Sgt. Oddball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

If anyone has behind the scene, buried dirt and/or info on Barry, it is surely Bill & Hillary.


18 posted on 05/18/2012 3:34:08 AM PDT by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000
I suspect your right, They will find themselves just as stunned as the birthers are that almost no one seems to care. Hillary is no patriot, many on the democrat side were on to Barry and his made up life story, but they wanted the power that comes from being in control of 2 branches of government.
19 posted on 05/18/2012 3:42:02 AM PDT by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

“Does anyone here at FR truly believe Hillary Clinton can win this election if nominated at the Democratic Party’s convention?”

She might not be able to win, but she must have a better shot than Obama.


20 posted on 05/18/2012 3:46:11 AM PDT by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson