Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Posted on 04/22/2012 4:13:16 PM PDT by Uncle Slayton
One Million Moms' newest campaign is highlighting Urban Outfitters, whose April catalog features two presumably lesbian women awkwardly kissing.
One Million Moms, a conservative values offshoot of the American Family Association, is boycotting Urban Outfitters for the lewd photo, which they claim is "geared toward teenagers."
(Excerpt) Read more at global.christianpost.com ...
Of course it won’t end.
Why would it end? They are on offense and no one is going to try and stop them.
Picture ?
No it won’t end.
We are well on the road to normalizing homosexuality, and this kind of thing is just one part of it.
If anybody says anything, then the gay activists will shift into high gear, call anyone who dares say anything homophobic, and be supported by their useful idiots in the MSM.
To the liberals, there is nothing objectionable, or questionable, about this sort of ad campaign.
last dollar I’ll spend there for my 14 year old
It doesn’t surprise me. The leftards pretty much can do whatever they want as they have punished anyone who talks back against the fudgepackers and their perverted crap over the years. If Andrew Dice Clay was around today, he would be unemployed and blacklisted.
http://blog.sfgate.com/sfmoms/2012/04/18/urban-outfitters-lesbian-kiss-catalog-photo-sparks-parent-outrage/#4546-10
My 13 year old niece would go to Target, try them on, write the item number and order online through my brother’s cc. I discovered through her that it’s cheaper online with the very same item you find in store. Kids nowadays..
I used to like Urban Outfitters because they sold shirts with old movies/tv shows/video game/comic book characters on them.
I liked them because I am a nerd, but then I realized everyone else was buying them ironically!!!
http://blog.sfgate.com/sfmoms/files/2012/04/Urban-Outfitters.jpg
I had a discussion about homosexuals with a young person recently. She was urging that I needed to be more tolerant.
I replied that I am tolerant—that what they want is acceptance & approval, and the best I can do is tolerance.
I don’t have to have this stuff in my home.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
I just saw the ad. They may be kissing but they don't look like any lesbians I've ever seen.
I would not use the word “normalize”. I think it will only lead to the next moral barrier to break down and the next and the next.
Hubby and I were watching bits and pieces of ‘Along Came Polly’ and I had to rewind when I saw something that made my jaw drop. Or rather heard. One guy said, “For Christ sake” but ‘Christ’ was bleeped out.
Not long afterwards, someone said ‘bitc#’ but that word was left in.
What is the world is going on when profanity is acceptable but saying ‘Christ is considered so offensive that it needs to be censored.
And reading this article, it is just disgusting that JCP said, when threatened with a boycott for choosing Ellen Degenerate, that they shared the same values as Ellen. Exactly what values? Is it tolerance? Or is that just for gays- we have to tolerate their lifestyle but they can spit on Christian values?
Meh.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
When even someone like actress Amber Heard is an open lesbian, then I’m not sure there’s a “look” anymore.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1720028/
I would say the left and the culture at large has been wildly successful in making sure that any female born since the mid-1980s who would possibly ever engage in homosexual activity DOES do so. Outside of religious doctrine, there is absolutely no social discouragement to the behavior and there is plenty of encouragement. Where there is discouragement is for anyone saying the behavior should not be done.
I think I saw one poll a couple years ago that suggested about 15% of women were homosexual or bisexual, or perhaps had engaged in the behavior at least once, and this had gone way up compared to a poll a couple decades prior for the same question which was around 5%. That sample might have been limited to a younger age group, can’t remember. Such a big rise in a matter of years lends credence to the fact that social factors have a big influence on the behavior, not just genetics.
To see how insanely skewed the media has made the public’s perception of the prevalence of homosexuality, a recent Gallup poll says American adults think 25% of the population is gay, up from 21-22% about 10 years ago. But the Gallup survey cites a recent study by a guy who estimates only 3.5% of the population is non-heterosexual. I’d definitely say it’s closer to that number. Do people really think 1 out of every 4 people they’ve ever met is gay? I don’t even think 25% of the people as shown in Hollywood TV and movies are gay. But people obviously find it very hard to estimate a single digit percentage, which always sounds so small, compared to the huge, unwarranted media attention given to “gay issues.”
http://www.gallup.com/poll/147824/adults-estimate-americans-gay-lesbian.aspx
Shop American Eagle Outfitters....
its a better store.
Shop American Eagle Outfitters....
its a better store.
I read somewhere that there were two types of lesbians: dykes and fems. Fems do not look butch, they look like the actress in your link.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.