Romney-Rice vs. Obama-Biden (or even Obama-Hillary)-- that would surely be interesting.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
2 posted on
04/22/2012 12:16:15 PM PDT by
Innovative
(Weakness is provocative.)
To: Innovative
I have no idea whether Condi is conservative. Her foreign policy expertise is unquestionable ... though, apparently, she and Dick Cheney butted heads quite a bit. She’s been largely silent on domestic issues, as a far as I know.
VP polls this early are mostly just name-recognition contests.
SnakeDoc
3 posted on
04/22/2012 12:17:44 PM PDT by
SnakeDoctor
("I've shot people I like more for less." -- Raylan Givens)
To: Innovative
Black lesbian left-winger as the GOP VP choice?
Doesn't work for me.
4 posted on
04/22/2012 12:18:16 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Like Emmett Till, Trayvon Martin has become simply a stick with which to beat Whites.)
To: Innovative; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; Clintonfatigued
>>
Romney-Rice vs. Obama-Biden (or even Obama-Hillary)-- that would surely be interesting. <<
If that's the "choice", I'm voting for Goode-Clymer. (and if any freeper is going to whine that doing so will cause Obama to win, I live in Illinois. If you think this state's electoral votes will go to Romney, I have a bridge to sell you). Romney is bad enough, I don't want a running mate who's even MORE liberal.
6 posted on
04/22/2012 12:19:39 PM PDT by
BillyBoy
(Illegals for Perry/Gingrich 2012 : Don't be "heartless"/ Be "humane")
To: Innovative
To: Innovative
Condi Rice tops GOP VP list
What? Was Lincoln Chafee not available? /s
10 posted on
04/22/2012 12:24:10 PM PDT by
Engraved-on-His-hands
(Mitt Romney is a handbasket driver. I refuse to ride.)
To: Innovative
NO to Socialist Slick Willard !
11 posted on
04/22/2012 12:25:03 PM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
To: Innovative
Two pro-abortionists against two pro-abortionists.
Obviously time to call in the Thundering Evangelists to beat somebody down over this one.
14 posted on
04/22/2012 12:30:47 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: Innovative
Two pro-abortionists against two pro-abortionists.
Obviously time to call in the Thundering Evangelists to beat somebody down over this one.
15 posted on
04/22/2012 12:30:57 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: Innovative
16 posted on
04/22/2012 12:32:08 PM PDT by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: Innovative
Pull black voters? No. Won’t happen.
Key state? No. Rubio helps with hispancs and Florida.
Women? Perhaps. But I doubt it really closes the gender gap in VP position.
Better to pick a VP that guarantees major swing state and helps with Hispanics. Seems like Rubio to me.
To: Innovative
Oh boy politico bull shit again.
19 posted on
04/22/2012 12:41:36 PM PDT by
boomop1
To: Innovative
At least Rice isn't a "severe" faux conservative.
She'll tell you her liberalism up front.
21 posted on
04/22/2012 12:48:42 PM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: Innovative
The CNN poll was conducted by ORC International from April 13-15, with 473 Republicans and independents who lean towards the GOP questioned by telephone. The survey's overall sampling error is plus or minus 4.5 percentage points. Likely voters? Nope. Registered? Nope. And does "independents who lean towards the GOP" mean main-stream conservatives? Nope.
24 posted on
04/22/2012 12:50:19 PM PDT by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
To: Innovative
Oh sure, let's put another incompetent black artificial icon on a presidential ticket. It was Condi Rice who was responsible for George W. Bush losing his balls regarding Iran and North Korea when both Dick Cheney AND John Bolton were urging Bush to take preemptive military action against those two remaining legs of that 'Axis of Evil', remember that?
Hey if we're going to look at putting a token black on the ticket, call up Colin Powell, he can do a rap routine like he did not too long ago...
"Call me MC Boom-Boom!!"
26 posted on
04/22/2012 12:55:00 PM PDT by
mkjessup
(Finley Peter Dunne- "Politics ain't beanbag")
To: Innovative
NO. Granted, she is much more dignified than Biden, but she is not pro-life, and that will matter if she is needed for a tie-breaker in the Senate.
I will say, though, that it would just frost Michelle Obama to have an attractive black woman on the opposing ticket.
28 posted on
04/22/2012 12:58:49 PM PDT by
married21
(As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
To: Innovative
Here is a link to The Iowa Republican with their top 15 potential Veep picks with some discussion around them. Solid reasoning around the discussion.
The Iowa Republican
I could hold my nose and vote for Mittens, on about 1/3 of those picks, just to get that person as a front runner for next time around. Any of the rest, and I will be voting for Gary Johnson of the LP.
31 posted on
04/22/2012 1:08:34 PM PDT by
Pappy Smear
(Support the presidency, end the policies.)
To: All
Romney/Rice 2012... Somebody better gear up the Rice-A-Romney graphics :P
33 posted on
04/22/2012 1:14:31 PM PDT by
roamer_1
(Globalism is just socialism in a business suit.)
To: Innovative
“Romney-Rice vs. Obama-Biden (or even Obama-Hillary)— that would surely be interesting.”
Except she’s said repeatedly she’s not interested.
I could live with choice #2: Romney-Santorum. :-)
To: Innovative
I believe Condi voted for Obama last time around. That should qualify her as a good VP alternative him, should Biden stop playing the court jester. Condi won’t change the black vote, and she won’t do much for the feminist vote. She isn’t going to help with the Hispanic vote, and she won’t tip the scales in Florida. In her case, the PC VP doesn’t help much. Romney needs a VP who will attract voters he otherwise won’t get.
35 posted on
04/22/2012 1:20:05 PM PDT by
pallis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson