Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I take issue with the assumption in the first paragraph that it was their youngest - Bella's health that prompted Rick Santorum's withdrawal. Her health challenges were understood and had previously come to the forefront of his campaign during the Florida primary. So that doesn't gel. Neither does it gel that because Newt wouldn't withdraw it hurt Santorum.

Will it happen that by Rick dropping out Mitt picks up half of his supporters and the nomination?

Newt Gingrich knew that by staying in he was helping to preserve the conservative block of voters that would have moved to Romney.

But Newt is called "stubborn." I guess that depends on where you stand. From my vantage point, Rick Santorum handed the nomination to Mitt on a silver platter.

1 posted on 04/14/2012 4:37:56 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cincinatus' Wife

Ricks withdrawal made it easy for Romney.but the Gop still has to gin up support for this rhino


2 posted on 04/14/2012 4:42:03 AM PDT by Yorlik803 (better to die on your feet than live on your knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Look, this is a free market - and we’re getting the best candidate money can buy.


3 posted on 04/14/2012 4:48:36 AM PDT by Riodacat (And when all is said and done, there'll be a hell of a lot more said than done......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Dream on.


4 posted on 04/14/2012 4:49:00 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Rick was promised his life and the lives of his family would be nothing but misery so he gave up


5 posted on 04/14/2012 4:56:08 AM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

“But Newt is called “stubborn.” I guess that depends on where you stand. From my vantage point, Rick Santorum handed the nomination to Mitt on a silver platter”

Bingo! Santorum absolutely knew that Bella would prohibit his run for office because of her health problems. I can’t help but wonder if, by playing nice with Romney, he made a deal with the GOP for a future coronation by the RNC when Bella is no longer an issue.


6 posted on 04/14/2012 5:01:16 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Look it is time we all took a chill pill.
The majority of us here on FR had a candidate other than Romney. My first choice was Herman Cain. Last time (2007) my choice was Fred Thompson.
As far as I am concerned Noot has way too much baggage. Yes he is a good debater, and yes he would give ZERO fits in a debate. We don't need a debater in the WH.
Noot now has very little chance of getting the nomination. I live in Florida and Cain had dropped out. I voted for Noot in the primary not because I liked him but he was the best choice at that time.
As far as the baggage goes with Noot no need to ask me about it. It is known by anyone with a thirst for knowledge. It is not the wives I could care less how many he had or how they broke up.
If Noot should somehow get the nomination of course I will vote for him. I would vote for Lucifer over ZERO. I would vote for HITLERY over Zero.
7 posted on 04/14/2012 5:12:12 AM PDT by DeaconRed (I am not a Golfer; however I love ping. Ask me why. . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Neither does it gel that because Newt wouldn't withdraw it hurt Santorum.

No? Check out the results from OH and MI and the delegate allocation rules from Alabama and Mississippi.

8 posted on 04/14/2012 5:17:03 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Will it happen that by Rick dropping out Mitt picks up half of his supporters and the nomination?

Its too late for me to vote for Gingrich but I will admit that it would be hard to do in the face of the continuing attacks from a handful of Newt supporters.
11 posted on 04/14/2012 5:46:57 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Santorum suspension could unite GOP at last

Santorum dropping out certainly made it more likely that Mr. Etch-A-Sketch will win the nomination, but I think the party is far from being united and it will probably be even less united in November.

20 posted on 04/14/2012 6:13:43 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; Kaslin; freeangel; Voter#537; trebb; Joe 6-pack
Let's extend this line of thinking a little more.

I was a Perry guy. Keep him as Governor of Texas. He's doing fine right where he is.

Let's extend this line of thinking a little more. Assuming Romney becomes the (R) nominee, he will need to coalesce the base. He must do this convincingly for conservatives and Tea Party to get on board full throttle, not just halfheartedly.

How many of us were enthusiastic about Reagan in 1980 but thought the "Rockefeller Wing" was going to sabotage our chances when he selected GHWBush as his VP? How many of us were somewhat enthusiastic about Quayle, but not so much about GHWBush in 1988? How many of us were enthusiastic about Kemp, not so enthusiastic about Dole in 1996? How many of us were only cautiously supportive of GWBush in 2000, but roared when we learned he'd selected Cheney as his VP?

How does he get us on board? Here's a suggestion:

Run not only with your VP but with your proposed cabinet as well.

Conservatives sometimes have to be reminded that a President is not king. He can't get anything done by dictate. Above all, he must be a quarterback for the team. While a quarterback may sometimes run a ball in to the end zone himself, more often than not he strategically uses the talents of his team mates to move the ball down the field and bring about the win.

Did anyone hear Palin the other night (4/12/2012) on Hannity when asked if she'd consider being Sec'y of Energy? Did you watch her show the following night in place of Greta? Did anyone hear our own FReeper Allen West when interviewed on Hannity (4/11/2012) and asked whether he'd consider being Romney's VP? And BOTH essentially said YES!

Newt has practically conceeded. Are any of these folks any less conservative for facing what are becoming our realities this election cycle?

I have proposed cabinet and administration roles for persons who were Romney's rivals at some point. These are the skill sets we conservatives wanted applied to to the places of government where they'd be most effective. Instead of rivals let's make them team players:

Rick Santorum - Sec'y of HHS

Sarah Palin - Sec'y of Energy + Sec'y of Interior (merge these)

Newt Gingrich - Sec'y of Education

Michelle Bachmann - Attorney General

Herman Cain - Sec'y of Commerce and Head of GSA (merge)

John Bolton - Sec'y of State

John Petraeus - Sec'y of Defense

Ron Paul - Head of Federal Reserve (let the audit begin)

Donald Trump - Head Council of Economic Advisers

Paul Ryan - Head of Office of Management and Budget

Joe Arpaio - Head of FBI, and Homeland Security (merge these)

Dick Cheney - Head of CIA

White House spokesman: Mark Levin

And our own FReeper, Allen West, as VP.

Next: Most of these folks are honed primed and stoked from the recent primary debates. They're all sharp. Nationalize the cabinet selection process as much as the Presidential and Congressional elections.

Release every one of these folks back out onto the the campaign trail with an assignment: tackle in an "in your face" way each of these departments - stage a kick-off news conference in front of each one of them. Challenge the office holders to the equivalent of Lincoln-Douglas style debates allowing each Obama appointed office member to defend their record and their (mis)-management of their public trust.

They won't debate, you say? OK, try some new Rules for Conservative Radicals. Stalk them, dog them with cameras, shame them into the arena, watch the cowards avoid the heat, watch for and exploit their mis-steps, create and run ads based on their failures in office and refusal to be made accountable.

While this is distracting the DNCs resources, Romney can land his own punches on Obama in the same way he's managed to blow away all his opposition in the primaries. Use Romney's well funded strike teams to confound opposition at the grass roots, do what they can to discourage and depress Democratic opposition and their voters.

Face it: if Romney was able to take out his competitors in the primary don't you suppose Obama's hacks could have taken anyone of them out in the general?

Have Romney's boys sew the seeds of hopelessness and dissension in the Obama ranks, emphasise betrayal and failure of Obama to keep 2008 promises. Undermine, destroy and confound the opposition into a confused, ill-directed mass who find themselves fighting on more than one Alinskyized, freeze-the-target Presidential candidate, and instead spending their resources fighting 10+ personalities "running" for cabinet offices.

Who are the "generals" they have to call into a fight like that?

Instead of dividing us with all the endless sniping, let's quit doing the DNC's work for them and work on dividing THEM for a change!

Romney and Netanyahu both began strategic business careers at Boston Consulting Group. Agree with them or disagree with them, but admit that they are patient, long range, strategic thinkers.

One of the things Romney has been able to do in large part is to keep his persona distanced from the decisively well-calculated positioning of opposition to rivals in the primaries. His name-less, face-less cloaked "hit-men" are as effective as any guerrilla force out there, but all that activity is maintained at a plausibly deniable, comfortable, arms-length distance from Romney the candidate. I dare say it puts the likes of Nixon's and Clinton's "opposition research" squads to shame.

Sorry George. Enough of the "kinder-gentler" crap. Tight formations, and "gentlemen's wars" provided the fixed targets that let us destroy the Brtis in our War of Independence.

I can see that machine going to work on Obama and leaving more than just a few lumps. Let's turn the "talents" of Romney's henchmen on to Obama, keep them disciplined, focused, and this side of doing any thing "Watergate," and let them go for the DNC's juggular.

If he's what we've got to work with this time around let's face that fact head on and let's hold his feet to the fire and make our will known as conservatives. If he's smart he'll seek our trust, and appoint many of our cabinet choices. To secure our trust he's going to have to both earn it and maintain it.

He'll go a long and convincing way to doing that by arming, deputizing, and funding the campaign efforts of his "cabinet-in-waiting."

FReegards!


24 posted on 04/14/2012 6:22:36 AM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Seems the GOP rinos win again by splitting the vote in the primaries and allowing crossover voting so that their handpicked liberal demrino Romney can win the so called conservative nomination. What a joke it is.
I believe that conservatives must start a new conservative third party rather than continue to try to rebuld the corrupted rino GOP party, a useless endeavor at best and the road to serfdom at worst.
A barrel of rotten apples must be disposed of, the barrel burnt and a new barrel and new apples put in lest the old barrel corrupt the new apples, which represent DC politicians for those who continue to try to vainly rebuild a corrupt GOP.


30 posted on 04/14/2012 6:46:21 AM PDT by kindred (Jesus Christ is the Lord God and Messiah of Israel, a present help in time of trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I think Santorum was a RINO foil to Newt. Rick played the Catholic card well enough against Newt to give Mittens enough room through his war chest to make it about “only Mitt has a chance to pull it out now.”. Rick has already publicly stated he was a “team player” once - why does it surprise anyone that he wouldn't do it again? Remember when Newt was asking him to step down when Newt had the momentum after the debates?
32 posted on 04/14/2012 7:20:59 AM PDT by jettester (I got paid to break 'em - not fly 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

It unites the GOPE with the GOPE. I’m a Tea Party guy, there’s no “uniting” for me!


33 posted on 04/14/2012 7:30:17 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag (Still a contributing Republican? Why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

It would appear that the author has not been reading
FreeRepublic. Haha.


55 posted on 04/14/2012 12:41:35 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Lots of things wrong with the article. California is not winner-take-all. Only two upcoming states are, Delaware and Utah. California is winner-take-all by district.

The idea that the “best” thing Newt can do is pull out. The best thing for who? If Mitt Romney is inevitable, why does he have to spend any money in the primary or talk about Newt at all? He can just start campaigning against Obama.

If Mitt Romney is NOT inevitable, then the best thing Newt can do is stay in and make sure Mitt Romney isn’t the nominee, since the Massachusetts Mormon is virtually unelectable in November. The only way he could be elected is that Obama’s ratings plummet so much that a ham sandwich, or any other Republican candidate, could beat him.


61 posted on 04/14/2012 1:11:00 PM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson