“Annals of censorship.”?
More like Anals of censorship.
Do not kid yourselves for one second. Unfortunately, we are living in a country where mafia-like threats and thugary is in control. Many in the media are willing accomplices to the Marxists/Communists and cannot wait to transform our country forever.
But I also believe there are many that are horrified to see what is happening to our country and wish to expose the truth. It will take an organized effort of devoted freedom lovers and capitalists to actively and privately engage these people in order to win them over and offer protection if they start exposing the truth.
As with roaches - turn the light on and they scurry away. Then bring in the pesticide.....
Obama’s agenda is the destruction of America.
None of his policies or actions contradict this assertion.
The most effective means to unseat him, is to stay focused on the facts which demonstrate his anti-American, unconstitutional behavior.
By going down the eligibility trail, the focus shifts to the questioner, which is entirely counterproductive.
If it were ever possible to prove, there are no persons in place willing of able to take the action necessary to remove him from office or the ballot.
Focus on the man’s policies and the resulting destruction and let history deal with the rest.
There are several reasons why we do not know the truth about Obama’s birth or even his past life. First, Obama assisted by persons unknown, spent close to $1 million to seal or destroy certain records. Second, his autobiographical books were written primarily to establish a birth narrative, but contain inconsistencies and lack of independent support of the events depicted. Obama lived a large part of his life known as Barry Sotero and records under that name have also been concealed. Some of his life appears to be purely fabricated. For example no one seems to remember Barry Sotero or Barrack Obama as a kid in supposedly Hawaii. Similarly no one seems to remember him while he attended Columbia. Sheriff Arpiao has raised at least questions that what few personal “records” of Obama that are public may have been forged.
They never talk about it.
Rush would certainly mention things like the Arpaio investigation as news and then give his his opinion that there was nothing to it, if that's the way he felt. But he just says nothing.
ML/NJ
There are two big issues that the public needs to know but doesn’t seem to grasp yet. I don’t know if Sheriff Joe is going to get into these things or not.
The first regards the HDOH itself. They have falsified records including the BC#’s of Stig Waidelich and Virginia Sunahara and the 1960-64 birth index. Loretta Fuddy has committed misprision of forgery and fraud by refusing to tell anybody that the long-form Obama presented as genuine is in fact a forgery. They are breaking the law by refusing to allow a man to see the original hospital-generated birth certificate of his deceased sister. I could go on and on about the reasons that nothing the HDOH says or produces should be trusted. People need to know that. They need to know why it is imperative that we forensically examine microfilms, original paper records, and computer transaction logs to see what has been done to all these records in the database - because there is a history of records manipulation and law-breaking BY THE HDOH ITSELF.
The second regards the newspaper birth announcements. If those were put out by the HDOH, then why is there no birth announcement for Virginia Sunahara and hundreds of other August births that show up in the CDC’s 1961 Natality Report? Why were the Nordyke twins’ births (and many others as well) announced in the Advertiser but not the Star-Bulletin? Why are there sometimes weeks between when the Advertiser reported a birth and when the Star-Bulletin reported the same birth?
Like the HDOH’s manipulation of records, there has been manipulation of the newspaper microfilms, since scratches that appear on earlier copies are missing from later copies, and many of the actual microfilms in libraries are clearly not of a microfilming quality to have been the microfilms that were produced by the microfilming company. They were obviously produced by somebody else.
And the stories we were told about how the original images came out before the election are documentably false. Two different posters on conservative blogs claimed they had personally gone to the Hawaii State Library and made copies from the Star-Bulletin microfilms when, in fact, both those copies AND a copy that Michael Rivero at whatreallyhappened.com had been given by somebody at the Advertiser office were identical SCANS that are provably NOT from the HSL (since the HSL microfilm after that time lacked major scratches that were in that image).
The Advertiser image was given to Lori Starfelt by a librarian whose image did not follow the standard protocol (full-page image with copyright notice) and was deliberately blurred. The only readable portion had about 4 announcements showing. A full-page image was finally produced by somebody at Wikileaks under the name of Jeena Paradies, as a PDF with optical character recognition (a format that allows manipulation of the text within an image). That image had C&P lines directly below the announcement right under Obama’s and had C&P lines going into the left-hand margin a few announcements above Obama’s. The Wikileaks version was given to Michael Rivero at whatreallyhappened by somebody at the Advertiser office and the Wikileaks page was taken down. Later the Advertiser printed an image with the full page deliberately blurred and the only readable portion being the same 4-announcement snip that Starfelt was originally given by the HSL librarian.
The media relies so heavily on the birth announcements but legal investigations don’t necessarily go into the birth announcements because they have no legal value. When I and my colleagues started researching the announcements it was pretty much out of idle curiosity because Obama’s supposed Hawaii birth could easily have been reported by Madelyn Dunham and a birth announcement created so the presence of a birth announcement proves nothing. But the deeper we looked into this, the more I became convinced that there never was an announcement for Barack Obama’s birth in those newspapers in 1961. IF there had been, there would have been no reason for the funny business we’ve seen.
The use of the word ‘narrative’ has a connotation of fiction.... The fact that nearly all news outlets use it is a sign of exactly how that silence is maintained.
“One may assume and hope by faith that Obama was Hawaii-born and still demand that Obama’s original records (including vital, education, passport, Selective Service, etc.) be unsealed for verification.
The burden is on no citizen to prove anything. No conspiracy theories are needed to ask questions and demand “ironclad” proof “in the most resolute way humanly possible.” As it turns out, that level of proof means simple compliance with basic legal standards.”
More than Obama’s SSN Application needs to be examined. A specialist trained in document examination verified the documents submitted for Obama’s SSN and a report was coded with the application.
Obama’s PRA field of his SSA NUMIDENT needs to be examined. A “Y” in the PRA field indicates he filed as a Permanent Resident Alien for his SSN. A “N” in the PRA field indicates he did not file as a Permanent Resident Alien for his SSN.
(I think it was at the time of George H.W. Bush's campaign and the Democrats hoped to use the "investigation" as part of the campaign against Bush's reelection in 1992.)
So now we have "Because of the fact there is evidence, the seriousness of charge demands that we not investigate."
Obama and Sons' America.
I'm not going to condemn someone for concluding that there's no real story concerning the birth certificate at this point, but how is it the press hasn't tried to fill in any of the gaps in Obama's background?
Mr. Kuligowski’s article is very good. I am pleasantly surprised to see so many articles questioning Obama’s birth certificate and eligibility being published in American Thinker.