Skip to comments.
Obama warns 'unelected' Supreme Court against striking down health law
FoxNews.com ^
| April 2, 2012
Posted on 04/02/2012 12:46:07 PM PDT by Deo volente
President Obama, employing his strongest language to date on the Supreme Court review of the federal health care overhaul, cautioned the court Monday against overturning the law -- while repeatedly saying he's "confident" it will be upheld.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012election; backoffbarry; bhofascism; bhotyranny; bullyinchief; contempt; contemptofcourt; contemptofscotus; corruption; cwii; democrats; dictator; dictatorinchief; donttreadonme; elections; fubo; govtabuse; impeach; kagan; liberals; lping; marxism; narcissistinchief; obama; obamacare; obamapoleon; obamathreatensscotus; obamatruthfile; obameltdown; remembernovember; scotus; separationofpowers; socialistdemocrats; socialisthealthcare; treason; tyranny; tyrantinchief; unconstitutional; waronscotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-319 next last
To: Deo volente
“The president, adopting what he described as the language of conservatives who fret about judicial activism, questioned how an “unelected group of people” could overturn a law approved by Congress.”
It’s called Checks and Balances President Doofus.
Constitutional scholar my a$$.
2
posted on
04/02/2012 12:48:42 PM PDT
by
bolobaby
To: Deo volente
Just more arrogance from the dictator of the banana republic...
3
posted on
04/02/2012 12:48:50 PM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
To: Deo volente
Hussein despises the Constitution.
4
posted on
04/02/2012 12:48:59 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: Deo volente
Wannabe Dictator Alert!
5
posted on
04/02/2012 12:49:19 PM PDT
by
Deo volente
(God willing, America will survive this Obamination.)
To: Deo volente
Pharaoh Obama is issuing threats, again.
6
posted on
04/02/2012 12:49:43 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: Deo volente
Good gravy he’s a moron. “Unelected” Supreme Court-so everything they’ve ever ruled on is now null and void? No more Roe v Wade!
7
posted on
04/02/2012 12:51:33 PM PDT
by
mrsmel
To: Deo volente
It’s called checks and balances, Jacka$$!
Unprecedented? Hardly.
I’m glad he’s taken this tact and wants to attack the supreme court. Now he does sound like a dictator. “How dare the court strike down laws in accordance with the constitution that my liberal congress passed with almost 60 votes in the senate? What do we need this branch of the government for?”
Keep at it. He must have left Jarret at home with Barney Frank. There is no stopping him. His tele is on strike.
8
posted on
04/02/2012 12:52:07 PM PDT
by
Tenacious 1
(With regards to the GOP: I am prodisestablishmentarianistic!)
To: SandRat
I do hope we don’t get to the “Battle of Athens” scenario, but some scenarios are worse.
9
posted on
04/02/2012 12:52:23 PM PDT
by
donmeaker
(Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
To: SandRat
Seems our only hope is for the Supreme Court to Bit@h slap the executive branch.
10
posted on
04/02/2012 12:52:26 PM PDT
by
edcoil
(It is not over until I win.)
To: Deo volente
Good news. This indicates he did not get a secret phone call from the SC saying they voted to keep Obama care. If anything the call was bad news for him.
11
posted on
04/02/2012 12:52:53 PM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: Deo volente
Is this the same guy who set up a system of Czars?
12
posted on
04/02/2012 12:53:27 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(THIS SUCKS)
To: bolobaby
So Barry is calling the Supreme Court justices an “unelected group of people”?
What about Kagan and Sotomayer, his “unelected” picks? Are they included?
13
posted on
04/02/2012 12:53:39 PM PDT
by
COUNTrecount
(Barry...above his poi grade.)
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
14
posted on
04/02/2012 12:53:58 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Deo volente
Liberals like Obama have no problem with unelected liberals thwarting the laws or striking things down, or bypassing Congress, when it works for them.
He’s either making certain they will strike it down, or he’s gearing up to use it as a major election theme for 2012.
15
posted on
04/02/2012 12:54:34 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: Tenacious 1
Just for the sake of irony, we can keep in mind that no Confederate law was struck down by their pretended supreme court. Jeff Davis never got around to appointing anyone to that body.
16
posted on
04/02/2012 12:54:33 PM PDT
by
donmeaker
(Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
To: Deo volente
I hope the SC is paying attention to his repeated threatening language. I can’t believe this would-be thugocrat is in the Oval Office. He is single-handedly making the case for “anyone but Obama”. I can’t believe I’m saying this, as much as I despise Romney. Threats to the SC are my line in the sand.
17
posted on
04/02/2012 12:55:06 PM PDT
by
mrsmel
To: Deo volente
questioned how an "unelected group of people" could overturn a law approved by Congress Because the Supreme Court's constitutional responsibility is to overturn any overreach by the elected branch of government
18
posted on
04/02/2012 12:55:36 PM PDT
by
oldbrowser
(They are Marxists, don't call them democrats)
To: Deo volente
Zero isn't a moron. An Evil Socialist, yes... But not stupid.
He's doing this on purpose. Even the wording is very specific.
19
posted on
04/02/2012 12:55:56 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
To: edcoil
We’ll lead this Pharaoh to race into the Red Sea of Election Day.
20
posted on
04/02/2012 12:56:18 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-319 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson