Posted on 03/04/2012 2:50:54 AM PST by Kaslin
Having just attended Sheriff Joe Arpaio's "Cold Case Posse" news conference in Phoenix, Arizona, we candidly admit we have never seen a greater example of raw media bias in our 30 years of watching the fourth estate.
Arpaio organized the cold case five-member law enforcement posse last year to investigate allegations that the Obama birth certificate released to the public by the White House on April 27, 2011 might be a forgery, and he said he constituted the posse after a request by 250 Maricopa County citizens.
In less than an hour, Arpaio's team laid out a compelling case that individuals working under the President of the United States have engaged in criminal forgery. And most interestingly, the case isn't just about Obama's birth certificate.
The case against Obama was made with simple, clear videos describing the techniques the forgers used to falsifying important documents released by Obama's team. It was obvious that the law enforcement professionals doing the actual investigation are real pros. If you want the details of the techniques used you can watch the videos on Westernjournalism.com.
The Arpaio team devastated the legitimacy of Obama's purported birth certificate from Hawaii. The investigation by document forensic experts systematically showed how the document could not be real and is part of a criminal conspiracy to commit fraud.
But we found the most interesting information presented to have nothing to do with the Obama nativity story. Instead it had to do with the selective service records. Forensic document analysis proved this document was also a forgery. Intensive documentation proving that Postal indicia on the form was forged was particularly damaging, as this type of postal fraud is a federal felony.
In the days ahead, it will be interesting to see if the mainstream media provides any coverage of the event's allegations. Sitting in the room we were overwhelmed by the professionalism of these sworn officers of the law. They clearly used the best experts in their investigation. Finally a legitimate law enforcement official has looked at the evidence and found, as Arpaio said, "probable cause that a felony has been committed."
Going forward, Arpaio said that he would continue to investigate. Illusions were made to the existence of over 200 sworn depositions by witnesses in the case, including a witness that, when he met Barack Obama was introduced to him, as a foreign exchange student.
If you don't believe us, go and watch the video of the news conference yourself; it is posted online.
Obama's team responded with ridicule, not answers. His campaign tweeted links to an old episode of the X-Files TV show. But ridicule in the face of legitimate questions only works so long.
Citizens are still daring to ask questions about Obama. And by doing it you face certain ridicule, name calling and being treated as children. Even when you may be asking legitimate questions, which have been routinely asked of presidential candidates in the past or have been asked of Republican candidates this year, you are censured.
As WND.com has reported, "Poll after poll in recent months has indicated that Americans have a high level of concern over Barack Obama's eligibility to be president; with one poll showing fully half of the nation wants Congress to investigate the question." But to date, nothing has been done.
Let's hope the US Congress can have the courage of Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
Arpaio needs to get bodyguards. Why do you think Rush doesn't talk about this issue, yet he runs around with security guards surrounding him?
Talking about this and other issues and living in fear are two different things and I guess Rush feels comfortable living in fear. That's all fine an dandy. I couldn't care less if Rush is paying for bodyguards and security people to protect him, that's his right, but when the system has beaten you down in to submission and playing pattycake with them they've won.
22cal: “After one such investigation, Richard Nixon resigned.”
Which proves that even Richard Nixon has much more character than Obama.
I think you are referring to the mushroom theory of management.
First they cultivate you,
then they cover you with manure,
then they keep you in the dark,
and the first one to stick up his head gets it cut off.
Regards,
GtG
Rusty interviewed Michael Zullo on his friday show who said that Sheriff Arpaio had little to no knowledge of this controversy when he was petitioned by hundreds of his constituents to look into the matter. Zullo, a retired detective, said that they set out with the mindset that they likely wouldn't find much evidence to the notion of a bogus birth certificate. Surprised he was......lol
He also had on Jerome Corsi........Rusty lamented that this story is getting little to NO play in the State Run Media. Corsi sounded almost giddy and assured him, “I am absolutely confident that this is a breakthrough story.” Then when on to say there is more damaging revelations to come.
Actually, the response I was awaiting is:
First they ignore you
Then, they ridicule you
Then, they fight you
Then,
They lose...
I embrace the old Chinese curse, that we live in “interesting times”...
I thought you were going to say, "Right after I bought my Sleep Number Bed. My Gold Bars? Tea Bags? Carbonite?"
We are in a heap'o'trouble when Conservatives expect political leadership from former DJs.
No they're not. The findings of The Arpaio Report are nonetheless valuable because if Arizona had an honest governor or AG, they could use Joe's info to take Obama off the state ballot.
What has been forgotten is that every state AG, Governor, or election authority can take anyone off any ballot in order to force them to prove their bona fides. They don't need a court order. They need not take ANY candidate's word and can challenge any provided documentation. It is actually a discretionary power!
It is extremely simple. In all the legal cases to date, Team Obama has been the DEFENDANT. The trick is to make them the PLAINTIFFS. That way no court in the land can dismiss the case "for lack of standing."
One state. One AG. And this mess is in front of the SCOTUS where ... win, lose, or draw ... it belongs. Now. That's what Sheriff Joe has done for us ... but ONLY if the Arizona authorities take action.
If Sheriff Joe's info is not used by the Arizona authorities ... and there is no law that says it has to be ... the whole issue is just another WND "Birther" Tempest in a teapot.
BTW, are we sure this really happened out in Arizona? I mean wouldn't Rush or Hannity said something ... anything ... about it?
Could it be that Rush raised the idiotic, nonsensical Fluke issue to obfuscate and head off what Arpaio released? Rush = a double-agent?
Here’s worth reading and ponder on. If it all holds true, he was not ever eligible to be a State or U.S. Senator, hmmm???
http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/obamas-eligibility-not-one-shred-of-authentic-verifiable-evidence/
Well, we dang sure haven't seen any evidence of leadership from politicians lately.
Just a big pile of steaming cowardice and treason.
ping
As far as eligibility and "right wing talk radio": From somewhere high up in broadcast heaven the edict came down: This topic is verboten.The real question is, why listen to these former DJ ani? They are generally, e.g. Rush, not educated men. They do not deliver the goods. They do not raise turn-out. They do not win converts. They do not stand for a positive program or plan. Think religion. They are not missionaries. They tell a devoted choir what it expects to hear, and then they pass the plate ... which for them and their advertisers, is the good part. They are Roger Ailes/Karl Rove/Mitt Romney/ RNC/ toadies ... craving respectability. Who has the heart to tell them they are entertainers? Insofar as they are useful to the establishment, they will be rewarded... but never respected.
It's bar talk for people who don't go to bars.
Of course you are correct. But political leadership is unlikely to come out of a radio speaker, the main purpose of which is to sell you a mattress or a gold bar.
Drop talk radio. Talk to your friends.
See Brotherhood of the Bell:
EVERYONE already knows that The Undocumented one is not a legal president.
He’s ONLY in there, by unspoken agreement, so that 1. THE DEBT ISSUING private BANKS, they’re ALL private banks, and government free-ride “contractors”, 2. all associated equity holders of these banks (”insurance” companies) and 3. big government pensions, maintain their hold on EVERYONE.
These three have THE shackle racket: debt shackle-housing, debt shackle-automobiles/transportation, collusion insurance of the two, and government contractor insurance and pensions. Look who gets all the free-ride constant pounding advertising you see.
This is why the Massachusetts Taxman is being hoisted as the next in line, because the above three had to resort to bribes to keep The Undocumented voting block in-tacked.
To remove The Undocumented one will take at least ONE OTHER additional “sheriff” legal law enforcement agent. Who will step up.
If I might add. Think the above three like ownership, where you can’t be used for levy?
The goal is to “own” everyone.
This article has already gone down the memory hole.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/townhall-yanks-column-on-arpaios-findings/
I think the Lefties used a bot script to overwhelm the comment section. On the cached page, there were 2667 comments, and the last page of comments that could be seen consisted of multiple posts by a single poster of the poem "Jabberwocky".
The Left is DESPERATE to silence The Won's critics before the SElection...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.