Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Biased Indiana Elections Officials Vote to Put Obama on Ballot
Obama Ballot Challenge ^ | 2-24-12 | Pamela Barnett

Posted on 02/24/2012 7:50:20 PM PST by ednoonan7

Obama Biased Indiana Elections Officials Vote to Put Obama on Ballot, Ignore Law and Fraud Evidence, Audio, First Hand Account

Posted by By Pamela Barnett at 25 February, at 01 : 36 AM Print

Biased Indiana Elections officials call objectors “birthers”, don’t address and matters of law and ignore evidence that Obama is using a social security number that was never assigned to him. When Obama started using this stolen SSN he was most likely an Indonesian citizen as State Department documents prove that he was known as Soebarkah.

First hand account here, unedited….

I hate to be the bearer of bad news today, but I was along side Orly Taitz as she did a hell of a job bringing up the subject of Obama not having a valid social security number at The Indiana Election Division Hearings’ candidate challenges. I am not sure of the name of the older Democrat on the panel of Election Board, but he basically stated that “how does a non-valid social security number from Connecticut keep Obama from Being a US Citizen ( and therefore President of the US)?” My jaw about hit the floor!!! Nah, no fraud here!, keep moving along folks, keep moving on. Orly gave more evidence( she brought along with her) to the panel besides the over 200 pages of Georgia Court case where many experts in their respective fields testified under oath to the fact Obama is a fraud. The chairman said the extra info could not be used as evidence!!!

Another dem on the election panel said most of the GA Court pages we turned in were not validated & did not have anything to do with the case, and basically it was a setup from the get-go. As Orly presented her case as a witness for us (since she was at the Ga Court Hearings last month), the tempers started to flare on both sides. One gentleman in the audience stood up and told the Chairman that he was being rude to Ms. Taitz and then we all took a 10 minute recess to cool our heads. Well, after Orly explained the connection to Obama’s fraudulent social security number, birth certificate from Hawaii, and mother’s record’s-it did not matter. We lost the challenge 4-0, and get this… There were all of the local tv channel’s cameras around the perimeter taping the proceedings and there were media people on each side of the election panel…but during our brief 10 minutes-that is all the time the Chairman said we would get to present our case- all of the tv cameras disappeared and most of the media left!! Nah, there is no conspiracy here. No media to even interview us after the verdict in the halls outside of the Indiana House Chamber of the Indiana Statehouse. This Country is screwed, blue-ed, and tattoo-ed. This Country and The Constitution is over if Obama gets in one more time. Time is running out. Let’s pray that Sheriff Joe of Arizona has better news for us all. God Bless K. S.

Election Commission deliberations on audio here.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ballot; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; challenge; indiana; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly; orlytaitz; ssn; taitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Josephat

They did.

My personal irony is that my parents and grandparents escaped from the Reds, then Nazis, then Communists. All to go to what, at that time, was a beacon of light. Only to fall, within their and my lifetime.


41 posted on 02/25/2012 4:01:27 PM PST by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7; LucyT; OafOfOffice; Flotsam_Jetsome; ProtectOurFreedom; Seizethecarp; john mirse; All

Thanks for the post; ping. Thanks to all linkers, researchers, educators. BTTT!


42 posted on 02/25/2012 5:47:02 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt; onyx; penelopesire; maggief; hoosiermama; SE Mom; Liz; rodguy911; Fred Nerks; Red Steel; ...

Scroll down for some audio of the hearing proceedings.
It’s like listening to an old B movie from the 50’s ... histrionics, verbal jibes, threats and all.

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/02/indiana-election-commission-obamas-moms.html

God help us ..


43 posted on 02/25/2012 7:40:01 PM PST by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7
he was most likely an Indonesian citizen as State Department documents prove that he was known as Soebarkah.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2728155/posts

Soebarkah

Lame Cherry ^ | 5/30/2100 | Lame Cherry

Posted on Wednesday, June 01, 2011 10:23:40 AM by mojitojoe

There has been so much written and conjecture on the forced out into the open Obama passport documents that I have not had much interest in exploring them in the name Soebarkah which appears on the document as one of the listed names of Barack Hussein Obama.........

44 posted on 02/25/2012 9:24:30 PM PST by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7; All

Playing Devil’s Advocate here...

QUESTION: How did Obama’s social security number get assigned in 1890 if the Social Security Act was signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 14, 1935?


45 posted on 02/25/2012 9:46:31 PM PST by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7
Has Obama ever been a licensed driver from years ago until recently? I have never heard anything about him having driver's licenses and what info was on them as far as his name etc. If he has never driven that is peculiar in itself.
46 posted on 02/25/2012 9:52:12 PM PST by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter
"QUESTION: How did Obama’s social security number get assigned in 1890 if the Social Security Act was signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 14, 1935?'

Not sure where you read that typo, but I recall having seen it also. What is alleged is that the SSN that "Obama" is currently using was originally issued to a person (now deceased) born in 1890, and not to "Obama".

47 posted on 02/25/2012 11:25:40 PM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower
"If he has never driven that is peculiar in itself."

Seems like pretty much everything about this guy is peculiar, to say the least! Maybe his last driver's license was under the name Harrison J. Bounel.

48 posted on 02/25/2012 11:32:45 PM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

“What is alleged is that the SSN that “Obama” is currently using was originally issued to a person (now deceased) born in 1890, and not to ‘Obama’.”

Thanks, FJ. Obviously, I got the facts wrong. The person was not issued the SSN in 1890, but that is when that person was born. I appreciate you sorting me out.


49 posted on 02/26/2012 7:44:12 AM PST by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter

What is this person’s name?


50 posted on 02/26/2012 10:17:53 AM PST by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Thanks for the ping/link. Interesting and interesting comments at the link. Your comment and tagline says it all.


51 posted on 02/26/2012 12:05:59 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Don’t buy it?

Lets see - what erupted when a thug, drug-headed, criminal was “abused” by police in LA? People died, businesses were burned -

And we have seen other examples - all for far less “wide-spread” “damage” to the “race”. You boot the “first black president” out of office and/or stand in the way of his reelection.

There is a lot of pent-up anger rolling around.


52 posted on 02/26/2012 1:51:17 PM PST by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Because there was a riot years ago there’ll be riots all over the place.

Nope, I don’t buy it. The pent up anger on the part of black people is due to their own ignorance, greed and desire to get something for nothing, fueled by disgusting racism on their part and goaded by racist “leaders” and leftists adding fuel to the fire.

I don’t buy it.

And if a criminal coup is allowed to stand beacuse of fear of feral barbarians getting violent, we are over as a Republic. It means the barbarians have already won.


53 posted on 02/26/2012 2:14:24 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks STARWISE.


54 posted on 02/26/2012 2:15:43 PM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp; Red Steel; David; Danae; bgill; Hotlanta Mike; patriot08; null and void; ...
Indiana was the worst possible venue for an eligibility challenge because it is home to the only appeals court, the Ankeny Court, to have ruled on the NBC issue...and that was in favor of Obama.

Yes, from a strategic point of view, it was a waste of time and effort to challenge O's eligibility in Indiana because of Ankeny. The challengers should have been well aware of that because Ankeny, inane as it is, was cited as the linchpin for the recent administrative court decision in Georgia (Malihi).

That having been said, Ankeny is a major insult to the entire edifice of American Constitutional construction developed over more than two centuries: it holds - ridiculously - that Fourteenth Amendment citizenship and Article II natural born citizenship are one and the same. One need not be a legal Einstein to see that Wong Kim Ark had absolutely no connection to presidential eligibility!!! Yet the Ankeny court somehow arrived at the conclusion that it did. It belongs in the judicial "Hall of Shame," right next to Dred Scott and a number of others.

55 posted on 02/26/2012 5:54:36 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kleon

To my knowledge, Susan Daniels has not identified the individual born in 1890 who seems to have been assigned the SSN that Obama now uses. But there is a very good interview discussing this issue with Ms. Daniels at this page:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/16/the-post-email-speaks-with-susan-daniels-private-investigator/


56 posted on 02/26/2012 6:57:17 PM PST by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7
I am not sure of the name of the older Democrat on the panel of Election Board, but he basically stated that “how does a non-valid social security number from Connecticut keep Obama from Being a US Citizen ( and therefore President of the US)?”

We need names. This is a fight for the nation.

57 posted on 02/26/2012 8:32:36 PM PST by bgill (Romney & Obama are both ineligible. A non-NBC GOP prez shuts down all ?s on Obama's admin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

“We need names. This is a fight for the nation.”

Members
(appointed by the Governor upon recommendation by appropriate major political party state chair)

Daniel A. Dumezich Chair; since August 2010; member since July 2006
S. Anthony Long, Vice-chair; member since July 1997
Sarah Steele Riordan, member since September 2006
Bryce H. Bennett, Jr., member since August 2011

source:
http://www.in.gov/sos/elections/2404.htm


58 posted on 02/26/2012 9:10:55 PM PST by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7

This is a Dog and Pony show.

Nothing more. I have to say honestly say, I don’t think any of the challenges will be successful. NO ONE has the courage or the testicular fortitude to make the legally correct call.

Obama is an usurper. He does not meet the basic qualifications standards laid out in the Law of the Land, Minor v. Happersett.


59 posted on 02/27/2012 9:06:20 AM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter
To my knowledge, Susan Daniels has not identified the individual born in 1890 who seems to have been assigned the SSN that Obama now uses.

Doesn't that seem like something you should determine before saying things like, "Obama stole a dead person’s social security number"? This is literally just four numbers that come up on a database search.

60 posted on 02/27/2012 11:51:24 AM PST by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson