Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UT/TT Poll: Santorum Crushing GOP Hopefuls in Texas (Santorum 45%, Romney 16%)
The Texas Tribune ^ | 2/20/12 | Ross Ramsey

Posted on 02/20/2012 5:27:44 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-195 next last
To: LuvFreeRepublic

The only thing that surprises me is that Romney even polls in the teens in Texas. I have never met a single Romney supporter here.

Lot of support for Santorum here though


61 posted on 02/20/2012 6:40:59 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: abclily

Evidence?


62 posted on 02/20/2012 6:42:12 AM PST by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: FerociousRabbit

I think Newt messed up not participating in MO’s beauty contest. He most likely would have won it and re-gained his footing. However, I think the reason Santorum is leading is because of his attacks on Romney over Obamneycare and TARP.


63 posted on 02/20/2012 6:43:56 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

! what? I haven’t seen those! I am a Mormon ads?


64 posted on 02/20/2012 6:43:59 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: deport

Thanks. We have an open primary in Tennessee as well. As our state get more and moe Red that is less of a problem with crossover mischief makers.

I agree that the faith based message plays well in Texas, here, too. I am still supporting Newt because I like the Plans he is proposing on the Issues. Couldn’t care two hoots about “baggage”. That weapon is used by people who fear he will send them packingfrom their lontime cushy nest in Washington.

I will vote for Santorum if he is the nominee, as long Romney is not part of the ticket. No Romney, not no how!


65 posted on 02/20/2012 6:44:36 AM PST by conservativejoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: dforest; Theodore R.
dforest, Every time one of these angry little people use a derisive term or label in regards to Santorum and his moral character and reputation then they are actually revealing their own internal disgust for their preferred candidate.

I think it is sad that these people try to tear down Rick Santorum’s image by trying to turn a positive into a negative. It is, of course, only because they don't believe that there is an effective way to promote their own candidate to the public.

I think Gingrich is awesome. I choose Santorum because I think his positions are better, his record is better and his electability is better. I would vote for Gingrich in a heartbeat in the general or in the primary if I didn't feel there was a better candidate.

66 posted on 02/20/2012 6:45:05 AM PST by GulfBreeze (Still a Santorum guy !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

Take that, Ann Coulter!
____________________________________________________________
What a traitor to the Conservative cause that despicable witch turned out to be.


67 posted on 02/20/2012 6:45:25 AM PST by no dems (I can't back Santorum anymore. He's so frickin' out of touch with the real world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic

To have a chance at changing anything, you have to win key elections. A candidate who cannot win in the primaries has no chance to change anything.


68 posted on 02/20/2012 6:47:51 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: deport

Sorry for the typos in my last message. I am having server problems, and refreshing the page took me back to my uncorrected message. I hit post as fast as I could before I lost service again. I’m a terrible typist anyway!


69 posted on 02/20/2012 6:49:43 AM PST by conservativejoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze

Bravo, I echo your thoughts. I get my perspective by talking to other people outside of FR.

That is the only way to know what the attitude is from people who do not participate on internet forums about politics.

I see Newt as having a very hard time up against Obama attacking him on Obamacare. It is hard to make a case when you agreed with the primary factor of Obamacare which is mandates. Yes, he may have changed his thoughts on that now. But you know how Obama and the media will spin that. Same with Cap and Trade and global warming.

I will vote for the nominee, but I hope it isn’t Romney.


70 posted on 02/20/2012 6:57:42 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: abclily

“Sorry, but Santorum is the only one (so far) with the straight-forwardness to define the campaign”

Newt has plans and timetables. Santorum has “ideals”


71 posted on 02/20/2012 6:58:07 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: abclily

Rick feels free to say what he thinks.
____________________________________________________________
And sometimes that is scary. Like, when he said: “Contraception is bad for America”. Or insinuating that women in combat would cause male and female soldiers to have sex on the battlefield....... Rick needs to be a little bit more “swift to hear and slow to speak.” (James 1:19)


72 posted on 02/20/2012 6:59:18 AM PST by no dems (I can't back Santorum anymore. He's so frickin' out of touch with the real world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: no dems

“Oh no duckman; not Jeb Bush...”
I am not a Jeb supporter. I would never vote for him after what he did to the Schaivo family and Terri.


73 posted on 02/20/2012 7:00:37 AM PST by duckman (Go Newt...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: deport

With Texas being pushed pretty much out of the picture with a late May or later primary this probably won’t impact the nomination.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
In years past, I would agree with you. But, this year.... I think this thing is going to go right up to the Convention. Texas is “Winner-Take-All” with 155 Delegates.


74 posted on 02/20/2012 7:01:00 AM PST by no dems (I can't back Santorum anymore. He's so frickin' out of touch with the real world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Yep, 155 Delegates; and it’s winner-take-all.


75 posted on 02/20/2012 7:01:49 AM PST by no dems (I can't back Santorum anymore. He's so frickin' out of touch with the real world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

IF Santorum wins Michigan, he might well end up as the nominee
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
If he wins Michigan, he WILL end up as the nominee.


76 posted on 02/20/2012 7:04:03 AM PST by no dems (I can't back Santorum anymore. He's so frickin' out of touch with the real world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: duckman

duckman wrote:
<<
IMO, the more I see Santorum rise in the pols, the more I see a brokered convention, with Jeb Bush nominated. The Establishment candidate. Only my opinion please don’t flame.
>>

************************************************************

I don’t really have anything against Jeb Bush personally, but I can’t imagine even the GOP would be idiotic enough to nominate another Bush for president given the rampant anti-Bush sentiment currently out there across the political spectrum. But then again, we ARE talking about the GOP here where idiocy knows no boundaries.


77 posted on 02/20/2012 7:05:48 AM PST by DestroyLiberalism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

The article went on to say anyone of the Republican candidates can beat Obama in Texas.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Definitely. Texas is the reddest of the red states.


78 posted on 02/20/2012 7:08:40 AM PST by no dems (I can't back Santorum anymore. He's so frickin' out of touch with the real world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dforest
And a candidate who wins primary, but doesn't have chance in heck of winning general won't change anything. Also, anyone who wins presidency who does not have viable plans to fix economy, won't change anything. Americans should have stood firm and focused on policy, but yet so many are concerned about stuff that will be moot if our economy continues on the path it is on.
79 posted on 02/20/2012 7:09:42 AM PST by LuvFreeRepublic ( (#withNewt))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Texas is “Winner-Take-All” with 155 Delegates.


Has the Texas GOP changed it back to a ‘winner take all’ since the primary will be pushed beyond the Apr 1, proportional requirement?


80 posted on 02/20/2012 7:09:57 AM PST by deport (..............God Bless Texas............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson