Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Rasmussen Poll) Michigan GOP Primary: Santorum 35%, Romney 32%
Rasmussen ^ | 2/14/12 | staff

Posted on 02/14/2012 11:31:26 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009

Former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, following his wins last week in Colorado, Minnesota and Missouri, has now jumped ahead of Mitt Romney in Michigan's Republican Primary race.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Republican Primary Voters in Michigan shows Santorum with 35% of the vote to Romney’s 32%. Well behind are Texas Congressman Ron Paul with 13% and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich with 11%. Only one percent (1%) prefers some other candidate in the race, while eight percent (8%) are undecided.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; anticondumrick; antirickisproromney; bigspendersantorum; freeperheadsexplode; gingrich; gorick; mi2012; michigan; outtacontrol; poll; proillegals; prounions; rasmussen; romney; ronpaul; saintearmarx; santorum; thesaint; whattagenius
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: PSYCHO-FREEP

>>Santorum is his own worst enemy. It was only a matter of time, before he would get overconfident and let his more arrogant, “holier than thou” self, connect with his over sized ego and big mouth.
He thinks he is the hottest thing since Hose Habenero so he is getting cocky. This is only the beginning. No wonder the left is celebrating the rise of Santorum.<<

Strike out “Santorum” and replace with “Gingrich” and your post makes perfect sense. And it ended his “Second Coming.” I don’t think he’ll get a third chance.


61 posted on 02/14/2012 1:18:56 PM PST by Norseman (Defund the Left-Completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
I posted yesterday that FR needs an “Angst Monitor” to add to the “BS Meter!”

I don't know if Rick can beat Obama ...it will depend on how he matures between now and the election and whether his “right to life” stance will be too rigid to gain enough of the moderate vote.

Newt is the venerable warrior who has the best experience and talent to beat Obama and the Dem Machine and the vision required to get this Republic out of the mess we are in. That said, as we all know, he has a lot of baggage and high “negatives.”

Romney will depress the base and will have great difficulty arguing against Obamcare given his historic authorship of Romneycare ...and then there is the question of whether he would really abolish Obamacare if he should be elected.

Given all of the above; I am still backing Newt; but, will accept Rick if he wins the nomination and picks a decent Conservative for VeeP.

Regards,

-Geoff

62 posted on 02/14/2012 1:19:37 PM PST by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
I am glad to hear this. Looks at this point that we might have Satorum/Romney or Romney/Santorum. Although, we every front runner knocked down so far, could the last man standing be Ron Paul?

jay Leno and David Letterman have been trashing first Bachmann, then Cain, and lately Romney and Newt. There was something similar in their slurs, often repeating the same ones. Yesterday, Bill O'Reilly had a segment on how Soros funded Media Matters provides talking points to NBC, MSNBC, and others. Thus, possibly Leno and Letterman get their attacks on Newt and Romney from MM.

Will Santorum be the next one to be trashed by Leno & Letterman whose attacks on GOP candidates so far have been predictable, similar, repetitious, and unfair. Of course, nothing similar about Obama, nothing about the clown Eric Holder.

63 posted on 02/14/2012 1:20:48 PM PST by Jane Austen (Boycott the Philadelphia Eagles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

Pa flipped to Republican in 2010, and it looks like the coattails of that are running into Ohio, so see Rick pick up Pa and Ohio... Obama can’t win without those 2 states.


64 posted on 02/14/2012 1:24:29 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
If the consolidation behind Santorum continues through Super Tuesday, I expect to see Newt get behind Santorum.

The combined totals of those two will beat Romney's total.

GOP Prinary/Delegate Tracker

Then there will be great hope to have a much more conservative candidate represent the GOP this fall.

If tht is so, and if we can do our part and turn out in overwhelming numbers to defeat Obama ala 2010...we will have great hope of turning things around in our nation.

May God help us make it so.

65 posted on 02/14/2012 1:43:12 PM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

C’mon non-Romney!!!


66 posted on 02/14/2012 1:46:51 PM PST by MiddleEarth (With hope or without hope we'll follow the trail of our enemies. Woe to them, if we prove the faster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
Romney campaign is going to 'Newt' him like they did to Newt in Iowa.
67 posted on 02/14/2012 1:48:48 PM PST by LibFreeUSA (Pick Your Poison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

no reason to get nasty.

I read the polls; I see what happened in 2008. I can see with plain vision that people can’t stand Newt, that they want their birth control, that they are manipulated easily by statistics (”look! unemployment is dropping!”); I can see that Romney won’t get the base (including about 99% of free republic).

I also see what obama is doing on pretty much a daily basis. I see that no one is storming DC to protest the blatantly unconstitutional ‘recess appointments’ that he made. I see that he is going to get away with whatever he can, and that we, collectively, are not really willing to stand up to him.

I think there’s plenty of reason to fear his re-election.

If you don’t see that, then you are simply naive. Maybe you need to get off the bottle a little bit.


68 posted on 02/14/2012 2:02:33 PM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Ozymandias Ghost

Well, here is an interesting article:

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/6-10-catholics-disapprove-obama/374661

If Catholics stay firmly out of obama’s camp, Santorum - maybe even Gingrich? - might have a shot....

The majority of Catholics voted obama last time....so I am skeptical. But obama may have gone too far in his recent actions.


69 posted on 02/14/2012 2:07:10 PM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA
It wont work, there is no way that Romney can credibly claim that Santorum is not a conservative, that just won't pass the laugh test.

let him try to attack Santorum and it will backfire and destroy what's left of his campaign.

Romney is going to have to sell himself this time or he could possibly argue that Santorum is too far right to win the general, but both of those are a far cry to what he did with everyone else in the race.

70 posted on 02/14/2012 2:11:22 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
That's why Obama and the Media are pivoting the abortion/right to life issue into a “women's health/contraception” issue. Rush spent a major part of his show today discussing how this would be used in an attempt to marginalize Rick.

I won't belabor the fine points here; as there are already threads posted discussing it. Here's a link to one:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2846493/

71 posted on 02/14/2012 2:18:15 PM PST by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Ozymandias Ghost

That’s why Obama and the Media are pivoting the abortion/right to life issue into a “women’s health/contraception” issue.”

Quite correct. And I fear that teh 53% that elected obama just might fall for it.


72 posted on 02/14/2012 2:27:38 PM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Norseman

Indeed. Santorum is a social conservative who is morally serious about issues like casual sex? Big whoop - if the Repubs are going to take flack, it might as well be for standing for something.

And yes, I know, Santorum is far from perfect in some respects, I.e. his big-government tendencies. But at least there isn´t any pictures of him making out with Nancy P. in a couch. On television. While pushing “action against Global Warming”. Time to rally behind Santorum. Romney won´t take him down easily.


73 posted on 02/14/2012 2:37:59 PM PST by globelamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: globelamp; All

Santorum pretends to be the only person on the planet with a moral compass. Mine works just fine.
I’m hoping to vote for Speaker Gingrich. If not, a “Palin” write-in is fine.


74 posted on 02/14/2012 3:05:04 PM PST by j.argese (Newt ... the Nixon of our time ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Still can’t believe Romney won two southern states. What’s in the water?!!!


75 posted on 02/14/2012 3:07:18 PM PST by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mangia E Statti Zitto

So how does Detroit look? isnt that a haven for lost souls.


76 posted on 02/14/2012 3:25:12 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Bump THAT!! Did you read the Red State article listing Santorum’s big-government votes? If Santorum had run in 2010 instead of 2006, the tea party would have primaried him. He’s no fiscal conservative. He doesn’t understand the concept of individual liberty. He’s totally fine with legislating his values upon everyone else. (Yes, I am a Christian. Yes, I am a social conservative.)


77 posted on 02/14/2012 3:28:57 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Go Rick! Beat him on his turf!


78 posted on 02/14/2012 4:13:03 PM PST by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norseman

“Strike out “Santorum” and replace with “Gingrich” and your post makes perfect sense. And it ended his “Second Coming.” I don’t think he’ll get a third chance.”

Anyone who rejects Santorum because he is ‘too’ conservative will go to Romney, not Newt.


79 posted on 02/14/2012 4:30:05 PM PST by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

“Bump THAT!! Did you read the Red State article listing Santorum’s big-government votes? If Santorum had run in 2010 instead of 2006, the tea party would have primaried him. He’s no fiscal conservative. He doesn’t understand the concept of individual liberty. He’s totally fine with legislating his values upon everyone else. (Yes, I am a Christian. Yes, I am a social conservative.)”

The difference is that Santorum is also defending fiscal conservative values while Romney is proud of his Romneycare and Newt likes to talk about his Moondoggle and how it is ‘inhumane’ to be for capitalism and controlling the border. Santorum was the one who went after Romneycare while Newt was trying to win over the Occupy vote.


80 posted on 02/14/2012 4:40:11 PM PST by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson