Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Pro-life leaders slam White House ‘compromise’ on birth control mandate
Lifesitenews.com ^ | Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:32 EST | Kathleen Gilbert

Posted on 02/10/2012 10:28:01 AM PST by unique1

WASHINGTON, February 10, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The White House announced today that, instead of forcing religious employers to pay for birth control, it will force insurance companies to offer the drugs free of charge to all women, no matter where they work.

The plan, touted as a concession to freedom of religion and conscience, was immediately denounced by pro-life Rep. Chris Smith. “The so-called new policy is the discredited old policy, dressed up to look like something else,. said Smith. .It remains a serious violation of religious freedom. Only the most naï or gullible would accept this as a change in policy.”

“The White House Fact Sheet is riddled with doublespeak and contradiction,” Smith continued. “It states, for example, that religious employers ‘will not’ have to pay for abortion pills, sterilization and contraception, but their ‘insurance companies’ will. Who pays for the insurance policy? The religious employer.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: bhofascism; birthcontrol; catholic; contraceptionmandate; democrats; hhs; nobama2012; obama; obamacare; waronreligion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last
This "compromise" is no compromise at all.
1 posted on 02/10/2012 10:28:11 AM PST by unique1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: unique1

I am even angrier now than when he first announced it.
The extreme degree of cynicism plus the fact that he really thinks we are this stupid.


2 posted on 02/10/2012 10:31:09 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unique1

He will not ever understand.

This isn’t about anything but freedom.

The right of life comes before the pursuit of happiness


3 posted on 02/10/2012 10:31:22 AM PST by Rightly Biased (Do you know how awkward it is to have a political argument with a naked man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unique1

The Federal Government is wildly out of control.

What can be done to stop it?


4 posted on 02/10/2012 10:31:40 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unique1

The Federal Government is wildly out of control.

What can be done to stop it?


5 posted on 02/10/2012 10:31:40 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unique1

Because liberals think money grows on trees, this seems logical. Conservatives know better and can recognize that this is merely a lousy type of Ponzi scheme - robbing from Peter to pay Paul.


6 posted on 02/10/2012 10:32:00 AM PST by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unique1

Woo Hoo! Rebellion is brewing!!!


7 posted on 02/10/2012 10:32:10 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unique1

I just absolutely love how he stirred up a highly controversial issue in the middle of a presidential election cycle. And they keep saying how smart he is.

Heh.


8 posted on 02/10/2012 10:32:34 AM PST by bergmeid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unique1

As a Catholic and a defense attorney who used to (until my stroke in 1991) do some work for a Catholic liability insurance company, there may be a small problem with obama’s compromise, er... accommodation. Does the Church have a medical insurance company of its own ? There is no way that a Catholic medical insurance company would pay for an abortion.


9 posted on 02/10/2012 10:36:19 AM PST by Ex-Democrat Dean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unique1; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; Bikkuri; ..


The White House will force insurance companies to offer the drugs free of charge to all women!!!

by order and proclamation of...


10 posted on 02/10/2012 10:37:48 AM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unique1

I heard a stat this past week: 50% of abortions are performed on women who were contraceptive-users. Where does that put the insurance companies who’re paying for free contraceptive coverage? I don’t know how long after conception a morning-after pill works, but at some point, surgical abortion’s got to enter the picture. Where does it put the pharmaceutical companies making the pill, or IUD, or whatever if the coverage doesn’t extend to the ultimate birth-control method? Do they get sued? Are they automatically responsible for the additional “free” service to women? Who pays for the lapses in contraceptive effectiveness, and why wouldn’t this fact affect the risk/cost of participating insurance companies?


11 posted on 02/10/2012 10:38:24 AM PST by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Is it time to lock and load?

Just asking.......


12 posted on 02/10/2012 10:39:08 AM PST by basil (It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: unique1

0 is acting stupidly...


13 posted on 02/10/2012 10:39:19 AM PST by MichaelCorleone (Stop feeding the beast; spend money only with those who support traditional American values.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

“Rebellion is brewing!!!”

Where do I enlist ?


14 posted on 02/10/2012 10:39:31 AM PST by Ex-Democrat Dean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: unique1

http://www.catholicleague.org/obama%e2%80%99s-ploy-adds-insult-to-injury/


15 posted on 02/10/2012 10:39:44 AM PST by italianquaker ( Mr Obama inherited an AAA rating and made it AA, thnx Resident Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unique1
If you find yourself debating someone who thinks this is a good compromise, ask them:

"what about Catholic health insurance companies ? (There are some.)

How is this a good 'compromise' when it changes nothing for them ?

.

16 posted on 02/10/2012 10:42:39 AM PST by repentant_pundit (Sammy's your uncle, but he behaves like a spoiled rotten kid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The Federal Government is wildly out of control.

We have nothing in Washington to stop it. The Republicans there are totally committed to maintaining this dictatorship, hence no impeachment. America is now in control of King Obama, the communists black Muslim dictator.

17 posted on 02/10/2012 10:43:53 AM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mach9; unique1

What we have is something worse than the original issue. If Obama does this, providing the funding and requiring insurers to offer these “services,” essentially we are seeing the start of a government funded, indirectly (at the moment) government administered population control program. It may be operated through Planned Parenthood or some other group, but what it amounts to is the government forcing everyone to participate in the government-run population control plan.

He’s going to use this technique for everything. Euthanasia will be handled this way too, as a “service” that will be paid for by everybody although not as a specific item.

He’s crafty. This is a stunning power grab.


18 posted on 02/10/2012 10:44:00 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: unique1

There is nothing about this jerk that isn’t clownish and incompetent.


19 posted on 02/10/2012 10:44:31 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny (Now I know how the average lefty would feel if Fred Phelps were elected President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Agree!

Something else bothers me here. 99% of women use birth control? I didn’t mind it too much hearing it from brainless news commentators, but hearing it from Sebilius really blew my mind. 98% was the percentage applied to Catholic women. Where does she get these figures? They’re insane, unqualified. But it does bolster the claim that 50% of abortions are performed on women who are current users of some form of birth-control. If that many women are on the pill (or whatever), nearly ALL abortions are performed on women using some form of contraceptive. So what conceivable good are the so-called contraceptives? And how in hell do they promote women’s (forget the aborted baby, for a moment) health?


20 posted on 02/10/2012 10:44:59 AM PST by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson