Posted on 02/09/2012 8:49:53 PM PST by Kevmo
>>Mitt suggests new physical model for condensed matter
Well, his MAss experiments do bring a manure spreader in a wind tunnel to mind.
——Could someone please translate this?——
I have alerted Dr Sheldon Cooper to the thread and hope he will give us his theoretical insight in language we can understand
Kidding aside, interesting article. This is the kind of theoretical work that is required in this field.
If Doctor Sheldon Cooper sees this thread, I hope he will feel inspired to answer the serious questions people have instead of dismissing us. I would appreciate even a reference to another thread or website where such serious discussion is taking place. There have been a couple comments above that are decent, but there is a lot of fluff here too.
I applaud you efforts and your ability to use the resource of Free Republic to discuss a subject of interest to you and widely separated Freeper associates
This was all explained years ago by noted physicists Captain & Tennille in their paper MUSKRAT LOVE.
Friend, I think you mean "What is the practical application?" because if there is not, it is time to take another Rip Van Winkle nap and see if the hypothesis survived. I studied quantum mechanics and wave mechanics over 40 years ago, and did some spectroscopy on "lattice" effects of point defects of "rigidized" materials, but that doesn't quite get me to the point of the "Run, Spot, run" level of barely grasping what this paper even hints at. Then, there were no microprocessors, no laser-read bar codes, no LEDs, no catalytic converters, no EPA, etc. Look where we are now!
What one might ponder on is that we have no concept of what a pure, truly pure, solid element might do; let alone how one only slightly doped might behave. But people are trying.
Where are you coming from? What will it take to bridge the gap between what you and I understand to what the writers are saying, in their own concise and clear lingo? Some here at FR do.
“metal matrix in Nickel or Palladium, causing the Lattice Assisted Nuclear Reactions and excess heat.”
That’s it! It is all so clear now! Wow. How did I miss that!
It is similar to the Turbo Encabulator effect. Can’t believe I missed this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ac7G7xOG2Ag&feature=related
This will be my standard post to moonboy that says youre not worth trying to have reasonable discussion, also says buzz off & doesnt leave crickets. But if it offends you to the point that you get it removed like my prior innocuous citation then I’ll have to come up with some other ‘ignore button’ post.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2800058/posts?page=55#55
To: Moonman62
This means I have nothing more to say to you about LENR. Bye.
55 posted on Sunday, October 30, 2011 4:41:07 PM by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
Lurkers will take note that when we try to explain things at a lower level it is more often than not a way for some jerk to just yank our chain. That’s often why some of us are reluctant to bother any more. You can thank guys like garjog for this state of events.
Guitars have also proven that the String Theory is correct. When Eric Clapton or BB King plays they go to another dimension -- all due to the results from their 'string vibrations' :-)
An aside: I've never tried Ernie Ball Slinkys. For about 25 years now I've been using nothing but D'Addario strings. When it's time to change the factory strings on my guitars, D'Addarios go on.
In the matrix of humorous connotations, the volume of “Slinky” simply outweighs “D’Addario”.
Observe that binding MITt Romney with “Slinky” produces a humorous tone with warm and fuzzy qualities; Mitt Romney->D’Addarios, not so much.
>>Mitt Romney->DAddarios, not so much.
Except maybe when played on a device produced by the Joseph Smith’s Ity Bity Deseret Amplifier and Magic Underwear factory in Salt Lake City... with knobs that go up to 11 instead of 10!
{Bzzzzzzz} It’s the bee hive state, get it? {badumpump}
LOL. But it depends if that 'Ity Bity Deseret Amplifier' is a good ole rockin' Tube Amp, or Solid State ;-)
I'm actually looking at new Guitar Amps now and I found one make and model that goes up to 13 on the Knobs. The company even jokes about it not stopping at 10 in their ad. But since I'm 98% sure I'll go with a Fender Mustang© Amp I didn't pay much attention to the brand. But when I saw that '13' I really did LOL.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/02/20/bloomberg_articlesLZNZ0D07SXKX01-LZO0R.DTL ~ find a hole ~ make a hole in a silicon base and stick a single atom in there and wire it up. Yup, all sorts of things are possible ~ now is that a micro-cavity? I’m still digesting the discussion of how they wire this prototype up ~ some strange stuff ~
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/02/20/bloomberg_articlesLZNZ0D07SXKX01-LZO0R.DTL ~ try that with this one. Bet you can’t.
Yes, I read that about a single atom transistor. Cool. Maybe we will see AI in our life time?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.