Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The article concluded: "Now, will we get the opportunity to debate the meaning of "subpoena" -- or whether the law even applies to this president?"
1 posted on 02/01/2012 7:17:08 PM PST by Sallyven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Sallyven
Not even King George is allowed to cross the thresshold of even one of these Sovereign United States without permission or be arrested for entering not only a state, but the country illegally. I'm sure that is a law somewhere.

(Slighly paraphrased, I think.)

52 posted on 02/01/2012 8:14:58 PM PST by Eastbound ( 3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LucyT; Brown Deer; null and void
according to an unnamed source, Obama watched the live feed of the hearings

ping

54 posted on 02/01/2012 8:15:41 PM PST by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven
Obama Got Served

....for all the good it will do.....

66 posted on 02/01/2012 8:25:45 PM PST by luvie (Unleash the American People!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven; Chode

71 posted on 02/01/2012 8:27:21 PM PST by Morgana (I only come here to see what happens next. It normally does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven
Now, will we get the opportunity to debate the meaning of "subpoena"...
Probably not. The debate on the meaning of natural born citizen hasn't been undertaken by the vaunted 'whited sepulchers' so why should the meaning of subpoena be any different.

...or whether the law even applies to this president?
I guess that would depend upon which whited sepulcher you asked.

76 posted on 02/01/2012 8:31:08 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven

Hopefully it’s enough to try him for treason!


77 posted on 02/01/2012 8:31:18 PM PST by Lucky2 (NObama - Done in One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen; Art in Idaho; bitt; LucyT

A Cordial, Legal PING.


78 posted on 02/01/2012 8:31:24 PM PST by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven
IMOM = International Man of Mystery

128 posted on 02/01/2012 9:02:44 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven; All

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999

(snip)
Every member of the Supreme Court, every member of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous.

(snip)
But not ONE member of America’s most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal
on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand.

(snip)
Half of the people you expect to stop this insanity
are quiet co-conspirators in the silent coup.
The other half is paralyzed by fear, motivated
only by political self-preservation.

(Snip)
Americans keep asking what they can do because
they see that none of their leaders are doing
anything to stop the demise of their beloved country. It’s the right question, because those leaders are NOT going to stop this thing.


130 posted on 02/01/2012 9:03:20 PM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven

Seeing such wide agreement on this issue, I assume that if the SCOTUS were to rule on the NBC (not the TV network, dummy!) it would, I guess, rule to please the establishment, avoid rocking the boat, so that Soetero, just off the boat from Indonesia, can be declared to be the same boat as George Bush, i.e. a NBC.


147 posted on 02/01/2012 9:19:43 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven

Bookmarked...


157 posted on 02/01/2012 9:28:57 PM PST by freepersup (Hi, I'm Michael Jablonski, and right about now my you know what is tighter than a tree's rings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven

The mainstream media, in lockstep with Obama, reported nothing of the events, in a stunning blackout on a truly historic hearing — one that discussed the eligibility of a sitting president to run for a second term.  And more troubling was the fact that the media failed to acknowledge the even more sensational news — that the president and his defense attorney snubbed an official subpoena.


How can this even be happening? How can there be not one whistleblower at any of the media centers? Not one word.

How bad could it get? Could Obama slaughter kittens on video and still have no mention? Is there any negative thing he could do that would get a mention in the mainstream media?


265 posted on 02/02/2012 12:51:30 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven; 2ndDivisionVet; afraidfortherepublic; Art in Idaho; Bigtigermike; bkopto; bushpilot1; ...
I especially like the motion by the plaintiff's attorney Mark Hatfield, who urges this judge to make a 'finding of fact' that Obama is NOT a natural born citizen!

http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html

Hatfield's Findings of Fact Submitted
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2841352/posts ^ | Feb. 1, 2012 | Mark Hatfield


288 posted on 02/02/2012 6:01:00 AM PST by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven; Future Useless Eater

I thought the judge was supposed to render his decision by Feb 1st?


294 posted on 02/02/2012 6:52:01 AM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven
IMHO the plaintiffs' lawyers in this case missed some very damming pieces of evidence.

I would have introduced Senate resolution 555 in its entirety. Remember that that resolution was the sense of the Senate that a natural born citizen had to have an American Citizen Father and an American Citizen Mother at the time of his birth. It was signed by every Senator present at that time - Democrat and Republican including the junior Senator from Illinois one Barack H. Obama. While the resolution applied to John McCain it reflected the Consitutional opinions of the entire Senate.

So, if Obama agreed to the resolutions verbiage (he did sign it after all instead of voting present) he knew well before the Democratic National Convention that he didn't meet the requirements of that resolution - see his own written and published words in his autobiography “Dreams of my Father.”

IMHO these two pieces of evidence, that were uncontested, would cause EXTREME heartburn for the Democrats at multiple levels during the 2012, 2014, and 2016 elections.

300 posted on 02/02/2012 7:11:55 AM PST by Nip (TANSTAAFL and BOHICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven; Alamo-Girl
The mainstream media, in lockstep with Obama, reported nothing of the events, in a stunning blackout on a truly historic hearing — one that discussed the eligibility of a sitting president to run for a second term. And more troubling was the fact that the media failed to acknowledge the even more sensational news — that the president and his defense attorney snubbed an official subpoena.

Which means, I gather, that the MSN has no objection in principle to the idea of an absolute monarch "governing" us. For only an absolute monarch can be said to be "above the law." Worse, the MSN — by deciding what is "fit to print" — on the supposition that what can be kept out of the public record never happened — are not impartial conveyors of on-the-ground reporting of important public events. Rather, they have chosen to be the handmaidens of creeping absolutism....

Thanks for the great post, Sallyven!

405 posted on 02/02/2012 1:53:21 PM PST by betty boop (We are led to believe a lie when we see with, and not through the eye. — William Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven
Good evening.

Let's see, if I neglected a judges ruling, or violated an order, you would see my face on the blotter tomorrow.

Emperors, dictators and such on the other hand, view these lower court rulings as frivolous. Annoying little things that drones or lower bureaucrats should handle. Definetly not to be bothered with by the annointed.

Societies quickly deteriorate when the upper, governing class, think the law no longer applies to them.

Jefferson was right about the liberty tree. The watering is long overdue.

5.56mm

501 posted on 02/02/2012 6:32:18 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven; Brown Deer; Danae; Ladysforest; edcoil; Polarik; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; theothercheek; ...
The two most important tidbits in this posted article are (1) Obama was supposedly following the Georgia proceedings in real time (despite the fact that his lawyer was a no-show) and (2) MSM reps were in attendance at the event (but few reported on it).

There is only one conclusion: Obama and friends admit that - contrary to their public posturing over the last four years - there is a real problem with his constitutional eligibility for POTUS.

565 posted on 02/03/2012 9:38:30 AM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven

Hey Sallyven, can you add me to your ping list please?? ;)

Thanks!!


587 posted on 02/03/2012 12:43:04 PM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sallyven; All
Update on Georgia’s Eligibility Hearing for President Obama

http://www.examiner.com/news-you-can-use-in-atlanta/update-on-georgia-s-eligibility-hearing-for-president-obama

The decision of Judge Malihi regarding the eligibility of President Barack Obama to be on the Georgia Presidential Preference Primary ballot on March 6, 2012, could be sent to the office of Secretary of State Brian P. Kemp soon.

In a phone conversation with Ms. Ruff, the Judge's secretary, she stated that her impression was that the Judge would be making his final decision; and forwarding the case on to the Secretary of State's office as early at this evening - or Monday morning.

There is a lot of interest all across America concerning the Judge’s decision since the hearing was held here in Atlanta last month. The controversy is whether or not President Obama is a “natural born” citizen; which is required by the United States Constitution to be President.

Currently the Judge is going over all the aspects of the hearing with all of the “legal eagles” making sure that all the t’s are crossed and the i’s are dotted.”

598 posted on 02/03/2012 2:05:00 PM PST by Smokeyblue (Obama's got NBC problems and birth certificate problems - a bad case of Cluster F**ked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson