Skip to comments.
Mark Levin Says Drudge Not Taking Sides in Election
Mark Levin Show ^
| 1/27/2012
| Mark Levin
Posted on 01/27/2012 3:40:03 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
Just said it on his show. Couldn't believe my ears.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bloodythursday; drudge; drudge4romney; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: Politics4US
I dont mind him defending Drudge, I mind him saying something that is flatly untrue and insults my intelligence to boot.
To: Politics4US
I dont mind him defending Drudge, but dont defend Fox News and Ann Coulter
Defending Drudge is not a problem, but defending what Drudge has done this week, is a pretty serious problem for his credibility. I honestly find it hard to believe he has jeopardized his program and ratings, for that!
42
posted on
01/27/2012 4:28:43 PM PST
by
ZX12R
(FUBO GTFO 2012 ! We should take off and Newt washington from orbit.)
To: lonevoice
“Marks one of the good ones, of that Im sure.”
Never doubt the power of corruption, and always remember that man’s greatest weakness is his ability to forsake truth in favor of the schemes of his personal life.
43
posted on
01/27/2012 4:28:55 PM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, and many others.)
To: vbmoneyspender
Well Mark just got done verbally beating the snot out of those who are trying to defend Romneycare.
44
posted on
01/27/2012 4:29:03 PM PST
by
Yankee
(ANNOY THE RNC AND THE MEDIA: NOMINATE NEWT GINGRICH!)
To: vbmoneyspender
All I know is that right now Levin is absolutely trashing Romney care. He just said that Romney doesn’t want to talk about Obamacare but instead wants to focus on Gingrich not being a Reaganite, which he says, it’s absolutely ridiculous.
45
posted on
01/27/2012 4:29:44 PM PST
by
MiddleEarth
(With hope or without hope we'll follow the trail of our enemies. Woe to them, if we prove the faster)
To: vbmoneyspender
Whether or not Drudge is taking sides is a question to be determined by watching what Drudge does.
Not by listening to statements made by people who know him personally.
46
posted on
01/27/2012 4:30:13 PM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, and many others.)
To: reasonisfaith
Whether or not Drudge is taking sides is a question to be determined by watching what Drudge does.
I have been absolutely shocked to the core quite a few times this week, by things people have said and done, who I thought I knew at least to some degree. This might be one of the biggest shocks. Drudge was not taking sides this week? Really?
47
posted on
01/27/2012 4:35:37 PM PST
by
ZX12R
(FUBO GTFO 2012 ! We should take off and Newt washington from orbit.)
To: JaguarXKE
Yeah, if you even look at the stories about the wives, it’s pretty apparent who Drudge favors.
48
posted on
01/27/2012 4:37:28 PM PST
by
LS
To: Politics4US
Why doesn’t Matt Dregs defend himself?
He is aware of the controversy. He should have the courage of his convictions and not use double-speak dressed up as news bulletins.
Birds of a feather - he is as gutless as Mitt.
49
posted on
01/27/2012 4:38:00 PM PST
by
sodpoodle
( Newt - God has tested him for a reason...... to celebrate life and embrace the future.)
To: ZX12R
50
posted on
01/27/2012 4:44:34 PM PST
by
Jane Long
(Soli Deo Gloria!)
To: JediJones
I did not know David Brock was gay. Am I the last to know?
51
posted on
01/27/2012 4:49:16 PM PST
by
Fishtalk
(http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
To: Jane Long
Mark must've missed the numerous threads posted on FR the past few days spotlighting Drudgie's blatant bias.
If Mark really said what's being alleged, then that's the only way that it could be explained that makes any sense. But how could Mark Levin not be aware of goings on this week?
52
posted on
01/27/2012 4:51:34 PM PST
by
ZX12R
(FUBO GTFO 2012 ! We should take off and Newt washington from orbit.)
To: Fishtalk
If it’s on Wikipedia, everyone must know.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Brock
Brock further said that his former friends in right-wing politics shunned him because Seduction did not adequately attack the Clintons. He also argued that his “friends” had not really been friends at all, due to the open secret that Brock was gay.[6]
53
posted on
01/27/2012 4:52:38 PM PST
by
JediJones
(Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
To: miss marmelstein
I think this is almost a case where many of FR posters have “jumped the shark”
To: onona
me too haven;t been there three days
55
posted on
01/27/2012 4:54:10 PM PST
by
ldish
(Looking forward to Independence Day)
To: onona
me too haven;t been there three days
56
posted on
01/27/2012 4:54:55 PM PST
by
ldish
(Looking forward to Independence Day)
To: vbmoneyspender
I’m not really surprised that Levin would say that. Drudge’s news is largely built on what he perceives as “trending”. No one can deny that in the last two days, anti-Gingrich news was definitely trending. It seemed like every country-club Republican dinosaur was crawling out of their holes to get a hit in on Newt in advance of the debates. There was very little positive news for Newt in the past couple of days. There is some today and Drudge has it, and has had since this morning. Trending.
And as for the suggestion that Drudge deleting this thread from his Facebook page was some kind of anti-Newt slam, if I were Drudge I would be very likely to pull a FR thread about me from Facebook as well, given that, instead of thoughtful dialogue, the average post about Drudge is little more than a chance to show how clever someone is in coming up with a personal insult.
Or then again, maybe Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh are just lying. Yeah, that’s it. They have worked this hard to get where they are just for the opportunity to lie and blow their credibility by giving Matt Drudge the benefit of the doubt.
57
posted on
01/27/2012 5:00:05 PM PST
by
newheart
(What this country needs is a good dose of bran. Attack Muffins Unite!)
To: JediJones
Thanks for that. Learn something new every day.
58
posted on
01/27/2012 5:04:39 PM PST
by
Fishtalk
(http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
To: true believer forever
That’s a good idea. I figure if it’s anything important it’ll show up on FR with a direct link. I am done with Drudge forever. His smear of Newt on behalf of Romney was unforgivable.
59
posted on
01/27/2012 5:05:02 PM PST
by
KansasGirl
(Romney to Santorum: Obamneycare "nothing to get angry about".)
To: newheart
Im not really surprised that Levin would say that. Drudges news is largely built on what he perceives as trending.
Matt's (ahem) trending news, made ABC, NBC, CNN, MSNBC and PBS look like completely unbiased news reporting this week. Trending? Really? You buy that crap?
60
posted on
01/27/2012 5:08:37 PM PST
by
ZX12R
(FUBO GTFO 2012 ! We should take off and Newt washington from orbit.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson