I’m not really surprised that Levin would say that. Drudge’s news is largely built on what he perceives as “trending”. No one can deny that in the last two days, anti-Gingrich news was definitely trending. It seemed like every country-club Republican dinosaur was crawling out of their holes to get a hit in on Newt in advance of the debates. There was very little positive news for Newt in the past couple of days. There is some today and Drudge has it, and has had since this morning. Trending.
And as for the suggestion that Drudge deleting this thread from his Facebook page was some kind of anti-Newt slam, if I were Drudge I would be very likely to pull a FR thread about me from Facebook as well, given that, instead of thoughtful dialogue, the average post about Drudge is little more than a chance to show how clever someone is in coming up with a personal insult.
Or then again, maybe Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh are just lying. Yeah, that’s it. They have worked this hard to get where they are just for the opportunity to lie and blow their credibility by giving Matt Drudge the benefit of the doubt.
Nice try but no cigar...Several people tried all day bloody Thursday to get Drudge to post positive stories about Newt and rebuttals to the negatives but he refused.
As for your idea that none of the "conservative" pundits could possible have an agenda to heard sheep to the left, I say, good for you little sheeple. Here's hoping you never get Coulter-punked with your little idol there...pats you on the head.
To all....Don't you just loved political virgins..they are so cute.