Posted on 01/26/2012 5:55:04 AM PST by RaceBannon
Article II SUPERPAC streaming live video and audio at this link
No. Thomas said they were "evading" the issue. The definitions of those two are totally different. Evading has a dark or negative meaning.
indeed!
IF the 14th Amendment is Declaratory THEN Ark is a natural born citizen .
You can’t get around it.
The lower court was affirmed WITHOUT EXCEPTION. The lower court indicated it might embrace Vattel but couldn’t and left it open to SCOTUS - WHO REJECTED IT.
Clearly, Justice Fuller understood what the majority opinion meant as it pertains to running for the President even if someone posting on the internet such as yourself doesn’t get it.
Thank you, rxsid. I hadn't gotten that far yet.
like I said, “what you said doesn’t matter to this court, because ZERO submitted ZERO!”
I don't find it hard to believe.
If the facts are anywhere close to what was presented at the hearing, the attorney would have been in a terrible position.
For instance, he would have been asked if the birth certificate downloaded from the White House website and presented by the plaintiffs was valid.
If he answered yes without knowing it for a fact, he would have been committing perjury and risk losing his license. If he answered "I don't know", he could have been held in contempt, as the judge had already ordered him to produce that information.
I wasn't the first person to suggest it on this thread, but I suspect it's true: the attorney didn't show up because he realized he was being set up to lie for Obama. Maybe it was after he requested a certified copy of the BC and was denied. Or maybe it was after he viewed the guy's video on YouTube that showed how the BC was forged.
She’s not a candidate, troll!
If the court had wanted to declare Ark a natural born citizen it would have.
It didn't!
Your speculative "IF/THEN" doesn't come into play because the decision is right there in black and white.
Sorry about that.
Atlanta Journal Constitution
No, I posted that you have been polluting these threads since the issue arose.
Do you have reading comprehension problems or are you projecting?
Either the court ruled that the 14th Amendment was declaratory or it wasn’t.
Which is it????
HINT - Read the dissent if you can’t figure it out.
Btw, I have a Court of Appeals case that has referenced Wong in an Obama case.
What do YOU have.
Your own interpretation which means nothing.
Until after briefs are filed in February.
I see they are still claiming that the birthers say he’s not a US citizen. No mention of NBC.
Clearly, you don’t even believe Justice Fuller who indicated EXACTLY the ramifications of the majority opinion.
The Majority opinion said that the 14th Amendment was declaratory. That means Ark is a natural born citizen. Really, do you understand how to read a law case???
So I will just leave it that the COURT OF APPEALS SAYS YOU ARE WRONG. Obama is an NBC.
You got nothin’ to trump that.
Show me the case that trumps it.
Charlie Manson also supposed he could start one with his Helter Skelter kids.
Good god, both the Majority and the DISSENT show that the majority opinion is that the 14th Amendment is Declaratory of the Common Law Doctrine.
What is wrong with you.
Do you even know how to read a law case.
Apparently not if you can’t even figure that out.
The Majority outlines the common law doctrine on natural born citizenship AND IT IS NOT VATTEL.
“... That was king OBOT Dr. Conspiracy.”
Here’s a snip from his blog:
I hadn’t heard of John Sampson before Orly called him as a witness. He’s a former INS agent with what sounded like an impressive resume. He’s retired from federal service and is now a private investigator. He testified that Obama’s Connecticut social-security number (SSN) is suspicious and that further investigation was necessary.
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/
I’ve been following this and the other BHO eligibility threads with great interest.
You mentioned in your post about not having to “stick my neck out to get this into the public domain now”
Does this mean the info about Obama being born outside the US is NOW someplace in the public domain?
In Canada someplace?
Where?
I’d love to read it :D
(I didn’t and won’t vote for 0; I’m not in Georgia however..)
He was on the six member SR511 committee and agreed to the TWO US PARENTS definition in April 2008. Right there he announced to the world that he knows he's not eligible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.