Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/24/2012 3:37:02 PM PST by Kfobbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kfobbs

The three presidential debates and the vice presidential debate in the 2008 cycle had a “no applause” rule.


2 posted on 01/24/2012 3:42:36 PM PST by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kfobbs

Seems to me that some of the previous debates had similar rules in place in various forms.

Crying that it infringes on free speech rights debases the constitution. After all, is it a free speech infringement to expect quiet in a movie theatre?


3 posted on 01/24/2012 3:42:59 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kfobbs

Who’s Brian Williams? Never heard of him.


4 posted on 01/24/2012 3:44:33 PM PST by Jacquerie (No court will save us from ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kfobbs
This has nothing to do with freedom of speech.
It has everything to do with freedom of choice.
6 posted on 01/24/2012 3:46:55 PM PST by evad (STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING. It's the SPENDING Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kfobbs
By "freedom of speech", I assume you are referring to the 1st Amendment. If I remember correctly, it says "CONGRESS shall make no law..."

Has someone passed a bill I don't know about regarding applause during Presidential Debates?

This is about as silly as the folks who claim that FR violates their freedom of speech because they enforce their own standards on their private property.

7 posted on 01/24/2012 3:51:45 PM PST by PalmettoMason (South Carolinians need to start choosing a primary challenger to Nikki Haley NOW!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kfobbs

What’re they gonna do if the audience cheers? Pull the plug and put on an old Cheers rerun?


9 posted on 01/24/2012 3:56:43 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kfobbs

Boycott Brian Williams by all means, but don’t confuse this with a freedom of speech issue. Nor should you confuse why Ronald Reagan was right, but Newt Gingrich is not about this particular matter.

Ronald Reagan’s campaign funded the event at which he made that statement, so he was perfectly correct and came up with a great line. Speaker Gingrich did not, to my knowledge, pay for the NBC debate. (If I’m wrong, please correct me!).

So Presidential candidate Reagan was asserting his right to control his property, while Newt was trying to assert the right to control someone else’s property. I understand why, but it’s still a mistake. I hope he rethinks this line of complaint. I would say “You don’t like the debate format? Don’t participate, or do what President Reagan did - fund your own debate.”


13 posted on 01/24/2012 4:03:55 PM PST by sometime lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kfobbs

I decree that applause during tonight’s State of the Union speech by Barry be banned.


14 posted on 01/24/2012 4:09:49 PM PST by COUNTrecount (Barry...above his poi grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kfobbs
I dont get it. If a bunch of us were there and we all stood up and clapped for Newt, what the hell are they going to do, shoot us??? How in the hell did and audience let them get away with this. I everyone did it they are not about to kick every one out of the building.
15 posted on 01/24/2012 4:12:26 PM PST by fish hawk (Tebow or Rodman, who would I like to introduce my grandson to? MMmmmmmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kfobbs

If they want to debate, then debate without sound effects. If they want a cheering audience then go on the campaign trail.


18 posted on 01/24/2012 4:17:37 PM PST by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kfobbs

The real problem isn’t that NBC ordered the crowd not to applaud; it’s that the crowd complied.


21 posted on 01/24/2012 4:20:42 PM PST by Interesting Times (WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kfobbs

I think it’s stupid. I don’t get why the audience went for it. The debates are for their (our) benefit.


22 posted on 01/24/2012 4:24:39 PM PST by CAluvdubya (My preferred taglines are not in the running...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kfobbs

I would start making fake coughing sounds when I detected BS. Can you imagine if the entire audience broke out coughing? That would generate a real impact. You can’t be held responsible if you need to cough; especially if a candidate starts feeding you BS.


23 posted on 01/24/2012 4:25:44 PM PST by jonrick46 (Countdown to 11-06-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kfobbs
Applause at a presidential debate disallowed by a network twit isn't a violation of free speech.

Next time write something less stupid.

24 posted on 01/24/2012 4:26:43 PM PST by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson