Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: upchuck; randita; Impy; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; GOPsterinMA; Salvation; antonius; ...
Santorum is right. If Romney loses in South Carolina, we have time to rally around a conesrvative alternative. The time is now.
2 posted on
01/15/2012 5:32:19 PM PST by
Clintonfatigued
(A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
To: Clintonfatigued
Right.... and Santorum would win what exactly?
3 posted on
01/15/2012 5:34:14 PM PST by
hc87
To: Clintonfatigued
I don't think Romney nor Rick S. can take the fight to Obama and win. I still think Newt can deliver the message the best of America vs. redistribution.
To: Clintonfatigued
To the headline: yea duh!
9 posted on
01/15/2012 5:41:40 PM PST by
svcw
(For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
To: Clintonfatigued; hc87
Many years ago I was angry at the way national politics was being conducted. Rather than carefully research candidates and make a decision based on facts, I went with the one who seemed morally pious and superior.
Voting for Jimmy Carter is a huge regret I carry to this day, because Carter, socially conservtive but a fiscal liberal, believed and acted upon his belief in government solutions.
I am not going to make that same mistake again by voting for Rick Santorum.
10 posted on
01/15/2012 5:42:48 PM PST by
SatinDoll
(NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
To: Clintonfatigued
Santorum has read the tea leaves right. And I am glad he is speaking against Romney.Romney loses the first debate when Obama asks him "What is the difference between you and me?"
"I think there are differences between me and Gingrich but frankly there are bigger differences between Romney and I than Newt and I," he said.
Right again, Rick. That's why should accept the VP slot when Newt offers it to you.The two of you would beat Romney, obliterate Paul, and then pummel Obama in what will be the toughest electoral slugfest in our lifetimes. Two are better than one.
11 posted on
01/15/2012 5:43:57 PM PST by
exit82
(Democrats are the enemies of freedom. We have ideas-the Dems only have ideology.)
To: Clintonfatigued
Mitt Romney is a sure loser in November if he becomes the Republican presidential nominee. Which is exactly why the Mainstream Media is trying to foist Romney on us and have him win the nonimation. This is not new info.
They destroyed Herman Cain because he scared the crap out of them...he could possibly have beaten Obama.
Palin had to be dealt with because she could possibly have beaten Obama.
They are dealing with the last few stragglers to get Romney a clear path to the GOP nomination because he cannot beat Obama.
13 posted on
01/15/2012 5:45:43 PM PST by
Bloody Sam Roberts
("The price of freedom is willingness to do sudden battle anywhere, anytime..." - Robert A. Heinlein)
To: Clintonfatigued
Barack Obama would "destroy" Romney in the general election Certainly doesn't sound like a "stalking horse" for Romney as a few have posted here.
To: Clintonfatigued
15 posted on
01/15/2012 5:46:34 PM PST by
FrankR
(What you resist...PERSISTS!)
To: Clintonfatigued
17 posted on
01/15/2012 5:48:52 PM PST by
Utmost Certainty
(Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
To: Clintonfatigued; All
18 posted on
01/15/2012 5:49:03 PM PST by
Utmost Certainty
(Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
To: Clintonfatigued
[Barack Obama would "destroy" Romney]
![Photobucket](http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f92/RetSignman/WallStreet2.jpg)
Maybe he seen my graphic.lol
19 posted on
01/15/2012 5:49:08 PM PST by
RetSignman
(I take responsibility for what I post not for what you understand.)
To: Clintonfatigued
20 posted on
01/15/2012 5:49:20 PM PST by
dfwgator
(Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
To: Clintonfatigued
Statement: "Santorum: Obama would 'destroy' Romney in November"
Response: I tend to agree.
Comment: How can Romney argue against "Obamacare" when Romney's Massachusetts program formed the basis of "The Divine One's" program. Further, Romney has taken so many positions similar to those taken by "The Divine One's" masters that Romney is a joke.
22 posted on
01/15/2012 5:49:48 PM PST by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: Clintonfatigued
All Romney had going for him was that people saw him as “electable.”
That illusion is quickly being destroyed...and now, the emperor has no clothes.
23 posted on
01/15/2012 5:50:47 PM PST by
dfwgator
(Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
To: Clintonfatigued
Gingrich-Santorum
or
Santorum-Gingrich
26 posted on
01/15/2012 5:51:56 PM PST by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Clintonfatigued
Why would anyone choose “Obama-lite” (Romney) when they could have the real thing?
29 posted on
01/15/2012 5:54:56 PM PST by
lightman
(Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
To: afraidfortherepublic; American Constitutionalist; Antoninus; AuH2ORepublican; BlackElk; ...
Santorum for President Ping List.
![](http://ricksantorum.com/sites/all/themes/RickSantorum/logo.png)
FReepmail Antoninus to be added or removed.that up.
33 posted on
01/15/2012 5:56:56 PM PST by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: Clintonfatigued
The left has already chosen Romney and it's only a short matter of time until he's anointed.
The proper response would be to immediately begin a new political party that is focused upon representing conservatives, IMO.
Since the Republican party is basically a “moderate” version of the Democrat party, it wouldn't take many election cycles to replace the GOP, IMO.
This is the only way to reverse the leftward course this country is traveling via the ballot box, IMO.
39 posted on
01/15/2012 6:01:43 PM PST by
Pox
(Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
To: Clintonfatigued
49 posted on
01/15/2012 6:15:32 PM PST by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson