Click the Love
Support Free Republic
Go Monthly
Sponsors will donate $10 for each new monthly sign-up
Posted on 01/10/2012 6:19:15 PM PST by Rome2000
Yeah and it was just B.S. headline. When you filter through the B.S. clicked on the link and read it... you would see its true.
Here this is from open secrets that proves it.
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2012/01/military-donors-still-prefer-paul.html
why say kid when you have no idea how old the poster is.
BTW I do and the poster is older than you think.
there is zero evidence our Military has a majority supporting RONULANS
Prove it or just admit it is made up
Even better it shows Obama getting almost as much support as Paul.
Rally?
You’re too braindead to communicate with. Btw I have grown children who might be older than you.
hope you don’t mind me saying you’re older than a kid to the poster?
LOL! Of course not, manc. I have kids in their late 30s. I just “identify” with age that much...the soul is eternal. Just the clothes wear out...
Just read his previous posts and you will see why. It’s obvious.
Here this is from open secrets that proves it.
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2012/01/military-donors-still-prefer-paul.html
Open Secrets is a respected site that is posted on Free Republic many times. Actually that is where I found out about it was from Free Republic. It's also been posted on Matt Drudge Drudge Report.
No kid you have been brainwashed in public schools and don’t even know it.
I’ve done plenty of research on this subject. What’s you are doing is spouting off left wing diatribe that your leftist teacher brainwashed into your skull in public school.
You had a thread pushing that bilge that was shut down this AM due to it being debunked, didn’t you...
LOL...
We know him as the benefactor of the Radical Left’s major organizations. Specifically, he initiated and backed over 500 organizations to defeat President George W. Bush’s bid for re-election in 2004. According to the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP), Soros donated $23,581,000! It should come as no surprise that the CRP is under George’s financial umbrella. The CRP was founded in 1983 as a nonprofit. Their mission,
“to create a more educated [Progressive/communist] voter,
an involved [Leftist] citizenry and
a more responsive government.”
Who supports the CRP? As you might suspect, the well known leftist leaning foundations are the primary funders, i.e., the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation, the Joyce Foundation, the Pew Charitable Trusts, and the George Soros’ Open Society Institute.
CRP’s affiliate is OpenSecrets.org. Their website states their Mission:
Inform citizens about how money in politics affects their lives
Empower voters and activists by providing UNBIASED information
Advocate for a transparent and responsive government
His propaganda machines that he owns and operates include many media sources, and well as online blogs such as Media Matters, Center for American Progress, and MoveOn.org.
MoveOn.org is another well known hateful, radical voice of this international financier. Soros has spent millions of dollars for them to spew anti-American vitriol. Remember they called General Petraeus, General Betrayus? Such a fine group of despicable, radical humans.
http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/the-puppet-master-george-soros/#more-6019
And you bash Paul at every opportunity? Why do you fight what you say you support? Something does not computer, rebooting.
Where the info comes from is not the issue, it never is, the issue is ALWAYS, is it true? Attacking the messager is a time tested method of deflected a truth that one does not like. If you think the facts presented are incorrect then present some evidence that refutes them. If you think the source is not creditable then us show a pattern of the source lying.
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/06/dnc-return-lobbyists-donations-after-opensecretsorg-blog-exposes-#ixzz1jGyGPpa7
Second a source can ALWAYS be an issue if there is a bias.
But I'll play along...
The proof they are fraudulent, besides their source, is their existence and the lack of ANY information that supports it.
What was the source of the data, who was polled, called, filled out what form etc.. Where did the information come from.
Furthermore what was the make up of those allegedly polled, it says DOD and “active” military. So what jobs and functions do these people have? Where did they serve and when?
When you have that data, something tangible instead of some simple “report’ then you can make an arguemnt as far as it being factual or not
I'll give you a hint, the whole thing has been debunked, your friend posted it early today as a thread that was pulled because the mods and everyone with a grasp of reality knows it is BS.
That is why Paul folk use that crap.
Ptards: “We say so, prove us wrong!”
The Sane: “Ok, show us the data, methodology, demographics etc?”
Ptards “No, you prove us wrong first...”
The Sane “Ok, there is no data, etc....”
Ptards “Yes there is, prove there isn't!”
The Sane “Give it to us and we will...”
Ptards “No, go find it...”
The Sane then facepalm and walk away shaking their heads and chuckling...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.