Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sprite518
For your possible edification (I say possible because you Paulitard)

We know him as the benefactor of the Radical Left’s major organizations. Specifically, he initiated and backed over 500 organizations to defeat President George W. Bush’s bid for re-election in 2004. According to the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP), Soros donated $23,581,000! It should come as no surprise that the CRP is under George’s financial umbrella. The CRP was founded in 1983 as a nonprofit. Their mission,

“to create a more educated [Progressive/communist] voter,

an involved [Leftist] citizenry and

a more responsive government.”

Who supports the CRP? As you might suspect, the well known leftist leaning foundations are the primary funders, i.e., the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation, the Joyce Foundation, the Pew Charitable Trusts, and the George Soros’ Open Society Institute.

CRP’s affiliate is OpenSecrets.org. Their website states their Mission:

Inform citizens about how money in politics affects their lives

Empower voters and activists by providing UNBIASED information

Advocate for a transparent and responsive government

His propaganda machines that he owns and operates include many media sources, and well as online blogs such as Media Matters, Center for American Progress, and MoveOn.org.

MoveOn.org is another well known hateful, radical voice of this international financier. Soros has spent millions of dollars for them to spew anti-American vitriol. Remember they called General Petraeus, General Betrayus? Such a fine group of despicable, radical humans.

http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/the-puppet-master-george-soros/#more-6019

254 posted on 01/12/2012 10:48:36 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]


To: ejonesie22

Where the info comes from is not the issue, it never is, the issue is ALWAYS, is it true? Attacking the messager is a time tested method of deflected a truth that one does not like. If you think the facts presented are incorrect then present some evidence that refutes them. If you think the source is not creditable then us show a pattern of the source lying.


256 posted on 01/12/2012 11:16:37 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson