Replies

First that post answered the charge by your fellow Paulbot that I was lying when I point out the very true fact that Opensecrets is funded by Soros.

Second a source can ALWAYS be an issue if there is a bias.

But I'll play along...

The proof they are fraudulent, besides their source, is their existence and the lack of ANY information that supports it.

What was the source of the data, who was polled, called, filled out what form etc.. Where did the information come from.

Furthermore what was the make up of those allegedly polled, it says DOD and “active” military. So what jobs and functions do these people have? Where did they serve and when?

When you have that data, something tangible instead of some simple “report’ then you can make an arguemnt as far as it being factual or not

I'll give you a hint, the whole thing has been debunked, your friend posted it early today as a thread that was pulled because the mods and everyone with a grasp of reality knows it is BS.

Well I don't know that to believe, I googled and I went to openSecrets and there was a little buzz ("No retraction necessary, since there was no discrepancy.") on their blog. They are standing by the story that Paul gets the most money from vets, and Dod. So I'd like to see a link that refutes that.

good luck trying to get through. I tried and came to the conclusion that it’s a waste of time and then I got private messages off other posters saying there was no chance in hell you can get through to the poster.

You’ll end up reading in the posts things like”well I don;t know what to believe” or words to that effect .

Show me where, or I searched but could not find it.