Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Civic Hybrid owner sues Honda in small-claims court for poor gas mileage
Chico ER ^ | Jan 3, 2012 | Linda Deutsch

Posted on 01/08/2012 1:08:24 PM PST by bkopto

A woman who expected her Civic Hybrid to be her dream car wants Honda to pay for not delivering the 50 mpg it promised.

But rather than joining other owners in a class-action lawsuit, Heather Peters is going solo against the automaker in small-claims court, an unusual move that could offer a bigger payout. And if successful, it could open the door to a flood of similar lawsuits.

A trial was set for Tuesday in Torrance, where American Honda has its West Coast headquarters.

Peters, a former lawyer, says that as her vehicle's battery deteriorated, it got only 30 mpg.

When Honda ignored her complaints, she filed legal papers seeking reimbursement for her trouble and the extra money she spent on gas. The suit could cost the company up to $10,000.

If other Civic owners follow her lead, she estimates Honda could be forced to pay as much as $2 billion in damages. No high-priced lawyers are involved, and the process is streamlined.

"I would not be surprised if she won," said Richard Cupp Jr., who teaches product-liability law at Pepperdine University. "The judge will have a lot of discretion, and the evidentiary standards are relaxed in small-claims court."

Small-claims courts generally handle private disputes that do not involve large amounts of money. In many states, that means small debts, quarrels between tenants and landlords and contract disagreements.

A victory for Peters could encourage others to take the same simplified route, he said.

"There's an old saying among lawyers," Cupp said. "If you want real justice, go to small-claims court."

(Excerpt) Read more at chicoer.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; US: California
KEYWORDS: collapse; default; honda; socialism; spending
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Huskrrrr

No but someone drives one to visit my neighbor across the street.

It is a fantastically magnificent looking car


21 posted on 01/08/2012 2:13:15 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

I had heard about this before but didn’t know it was a stupid hybrid. I routinely see hybrids pulled over halfway up the mountain as they stop to re-charge their batteries so they can make it up over the top.


22 posted on 01/08/2012 2:16:28 PM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Holmes
Hell, my brother’s old gasoline-only Civic got better than 30 MPG.

Not at all surprising. A hybrid car in non-hybrid mode gets very bad MPG because:
a: extra weight from batteries
b: the (gasoline) engine in a hybrid is typically smaller and less powerful than the engine in a non-hybrid car which means it will have to work a lot harder when the electric-motor is not helping, causing it to consume a lot more gas than a more powerful engine would.

Especially the second point is easily demonstrated by driving aggressively, on a track for instance. A hybrid will get worse MPG than a sports-car because it's just not optimized for it. Top-gear did a funny segment on this when they pitted a Prius against a BMW M3 on a track and the M3 got lower fuel-consumption.

A lot of people don't realize this however. A hybrid does not magically get you better MPG, it just enables a different driving style that, when executed properly, will improve mileage.

23 posted on 01/08/2012 2:19:01 PM PST by SwedishConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k
I have a feeling that the car has not been in hybrid mode for a long while. So it’s just like a regular Civic lugging around hundreds of extra pounds of batteries.

Bingo. And to make matters worse, the system may be trying to recharge the dead battery (which no longer holds a charge), thus wasting more gas running the electric generator.

24 posted on 01/08/2012 2:23:11 PM PST by 6SJ7 (Meh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

I had a ‘88 Honda CRX that got 50 miles a gallon easily - off of gas.

Never could figure out why everyone gets so excited about hybrids that get 40-45mpg.

Sometimes I wish I still had that CRX now!


25 posted on 01/08/2012 2:26:44 PM PST by Ektelon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart
I routinely see hybrids pulled over halfway up the mountain as they stop to re-charge their batteries so they can make it up over the top.

How strange.
I have never experienced this, and I have made many trips SF to Tahoe, and routine trips Central Calley (CA) to San Francisco, as fast or as slow as I like.
You got steeper highways somewhere? Oh Yes, that would be a 2003 Prius, with 93,000 miles on it.
Maybe you're talking about Obama's GM or Ford models?

26 posted on 01/08/2012 2:31:26 PM PST by Publius6961 (My world was lovely, until it was taken over by parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

is ethanol a factor?????????


27 posted on 01/08/2012 2:36:09 PM PST by tankrlm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

We do have steep but also very windy roads. Accelerating out of curves takes a lot of power too. The combination is a real battery drain.


28 posted on 01/08/2012 2:41:08 PM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame

If you don’t know what you’re getting into with a hybrid then it’s your fault.

..kinda like signing a mortgage you can’t afford.


29 posted on 01/08/2012 2:42:50 PM PST by CommieCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CommieCutter

OK, Mr. Know-it-all. Where does it explicitly say this on the Honda website or in their product literature?


30 posted on 01/08/2012 2:44:00 PM PST by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 43north
Hydbrids are dumb. A direct-injected turbo-Diesel gets 45-50mpg when you buy it and it still gets 45-50mpg 10 years later.

Something I've long wondered about was why nobody has used the diesel locomotive paradyme, where an auto would have a smaller diesel motor than would be required for the car, which actually supplies power to an electric motor, which drives the car.

Mark

31 posted on 01/08/2012 2:49:32 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dick Holmes

The very first Honda civics imported to America got FIFTY MPG! I bought a 1980 Pontiac Phoenix with 2.5 liter four cylinder and a four speed manual transmission with overdrive and it would do 34 MPG on the interstate running seventy miles an hour with four passengers and a trunk full of luggage, it wasn’t a dragster but it had all the power I ever wanted. In fact when I first got it I had a hard time shifting into second without making the tires chirp. I don’t understand why we can’t have higher gas mileage today. Ford had an F-150 pickup with a 300 cubic inch six and manual trans with overdrive that was EPA rated at 29! The old Volkswagen Rabbit diesel was a fifty MPG vehicle back in the seventies.


32 posted on 01/08/2012 2:55:22 PM PST by RipSawyer (This does not end well!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SwedishConservative

“A hybrid does not magically get you better MPG, it just enables a different driving style that, when executed properly, will improve mileage.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

I have pushed a Mercury Grand Marquis to 31.4 miles per gallon over 440 miles by careful driving. The first thing people need to learn if they want better mileage is to stop using cruise control, it is OK on flat roads but if there are any hills to speak of cruise kills your mileage! All the “experts” who tell people to always use cruise on the open road are full of garbage, even a simple pull out throttle of the sort that a 1950 pickup truck had would give far better mileage. Learning how to drive for maximum mileage is worth more than most people can even comprehend. Then we need to stop with the stupid methanol.


33 posted on 01/08/2012 3:07:39 PM PST by RipSawyer (This does not end well!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

Energy is lost when you convert it from one form to another. In the case of diesel locomotives, this is necessary to produce the very high torque you get from the electric motors that move them. In cars, it is simply more efficient to directly drive the car from gasoline combustion, rather than have the engine drive a generator to create electricity which then is used to drive the car.

I have wondered, however, how the numbers would play out if you used a high efficiency gas turbine engine rather than a standard ICE. That would bring with it other issues though...


34 posted on 01/08/2012 3:10:16 PM PST by rottndog (Be Prepared for what's coming AFTER America....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Two points on why she will lose: 1)The figures are identified as estimates, not guaranteed results; 2)Honda is not the source of the estimates, they are determined by tests done by the federal government.


35 posted on 01/08/2012 3:16:51 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer
You're 100% right about cruise control.

Also, a while back Popular Mechanics did some testing which revealed that, within reason, accelerating faster up to cruising speed used less gas than the traditional "drive as if there's an egg between your foot and the pedal" advice.

And yes, get rid of the damn ethanol, and while you're at it, get rid of the crappy winter blend gasoline which drops mileage by 5% to 10%.

36 posted on 01/08/2012 3:17:28 PM PST by Fresh Wind ('People have got to know whether or not their President is a crook.' Richard M. Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

It varies by make, vehicle weight, engine size and gearing. I had a GMC Acadia that got its best mileage by drivng like a slug. It was a heavy, large vehicle with an electronic six speed transaxle. Programming favored rapid upshifts under light acceleration. I’ve got a Corolla that just doesn’t seem to care how it’s driven, consistent 34 mpg unless it’s all highway speeds and no stop and go, then it’s closer to 40. I’ve got a Sube GT wagon that gets much worse mileage trying to nurse it along. Just accelerate normally, even fairly briskly, and maintain speed as much as possible. Mechanical drag from the AWD I guess, 28 mpg. You can get single digits with it if you keep your foot in it and it stays in boost, though.


37 posted on 01/08/2012 3:28:38 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
Something I've long wondered about was why nobody has used the diesel locomotive paradyme [sic]

Anytime you transform energy from one type to another you incur losses. The Diesel engine converts chemical to kinetic energy with great losses (~50%). If you then convert the kinetic to electric you get even more losses. You then convert electric back to kinetic, even more losses.

Locomotives do it for 2 reasons. They need instantaneous torque to move all that weight from a standstill and they need to be able to shift while under load, so designing a traditional gearbox for the diesel engine is pretty difficult. An electric motor gives you instantaneous torque and needs no gearbox. So they trade the conversion losses for the 2 gained benefits. But if you made a car with this concept you would get even worse gas mileage than this poor deluded Honda owner.

38 posted on 01/08/2012 3:30:01 PM PST by mwilli20 (BO. Making communists proud all over the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

Yeah..show me in the article where it mentions anything about the battery expiring before the warranty, or how many miles are on the vehicle? It doesn’t.

All the story conveyed was that the battery deteriorated and she lost gas mileage.(well.. yeah!) I don’t get the same gas mileage out of my Civic that I got 9 years ago.

Anyway...of course I had to click on her website link that is provided in the story and was able to read some of the emails. If those emails are true, then it appears Honda refused to replace the battery all together; they said they couldn’t reverse the software update.

So yeah that sucks for her, and I now have a different opinion.


39 posted on 01/08/2012 3:33:31 PM PST by CommieCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 43north

>>And how will said battery be disposed of?

It will almost certainly be recycled. Scrap value is too high for any other outcome to be likely.


40 posted on 01/08/2012 3:44:39 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson