Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul: 9/11 prompted "glee" in Bush administration
CBS News ^ | 12/09/2011 | Brian Montopoli

Posted on 12/09/2011 10:14:48 AM PST by Responsibility2nd

Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul said Thursday evening that Bush administration officials were gleeful after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks because it gave them a pretext to invade Iraq.

"Just think of what happened after 9/11. Immediately before there was any assessment there was glee in the administration because now we can invade Iraq," the Texas Republican told a group of mostly young backers in Iowa. He went on to suggest officials are now setting the stage for an invasion of Iran.

Paul, who was tied for second in this week's CBS News/New York Times poll of likely Iowa caucus-goers, is making a strong push in the Hawkeye state in hopes of scoring an upset victory in the first-in-the-nation January 3 caucuses. Paul volunteers have been working to convince Paul's mostly young supporters - many of whom will be on holiday break from college when the caucuses take place - to be sure to make it to their caucus site.

Paul's libertarian views - on the foreign policy front, he wants to dramatically reduce the U.S. military presence abroad and end all foreign aid - put him at odds with many Republican voters. A poll from Gallup this week found that 62 percent of Republican and Republican-leaning independent voters see Paul as an unacceptable nominee.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 50mmisasackofshit; 50mmisgay; 911; blameamericafirst; byebyetruther; crackpot; darkwing104isapos; darkwing104isgay; evil; furp; galvestonsnoopy; libertarianism; morethorazineplease; neoconlovefest; nutcase; paul; paulbashing; paulbotzot; paulestinians; rino; ronpaul; spotthelooney; terrorism; traitor; trutherzot; whynobarfalert; youknowhesnuts; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-238 next last
To: Responsibility2nd

I’m afraid that Paul may have just enough addled supporters to give Numbnuts a second term.


21 posted on 12/09/2011 10:43:54 AM PST by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Not only is Paul a lunatic, he’s a dangerous lunatic. So unfortunate that his following, who are for the most part really good people, have developed such a cultlike attitude which suspends reason.


22 posted on 12/09/2011 10:43:54 AM PST by Bayan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

So now he’s adding slander to his list of sins. Bsstard.


23 posted on 12/09/2011 10:44:05 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Ron. We had a shooting war with this country in 1991 following their invasion of a neighbor; you might remember it. We lost hundreds of soldiers, some were captured, some never recovered. A ceasefire was declared, the terms of which Iraq regularly violated. They also regularly fired upon our aircraft which were enforcing the terms of the ceasefire. That’s an attack in my book.

Saddam harbored terrorists who killed Americans, paid others and the families of suicide bombers who killed Americans and our allies, and attacked America’s interests.


24 posted on 12/09/2011 10:44:12 AM PST by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

So now he’s adding slander to his list of sins. Bastard.


25 posted on 12/09/2011 10:44:22 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

So now he’s adding slander to his list of sins. Bastard.


26 posted on 12/09/2011 10:44:43 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Sadly, Ron Paul in the White House would be our biggest national security threat.

This guy is delusional to the point of being a serious danger to the nation, if power were placed in his hands.

When parts of a man reach this level of delusion, talking about any other aspect of him as if he were at all sane, is counter-productive.

Gone are the days when I could say that Ron saw some things clearly. The respect I had for him over the years, has been replaced by the acknowledgement that he is a non benign fruit-cake.

Just like the one’s at Christmas, families now pass around Ron Paul every four years, because no one with the slightest common sense is partaking.


27 posted on 12/09/2011 10:44:43 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Why back in '88, Conservatives backed Gore in Texas. What Reagan revolution? What legacy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

28 posted on 12/09/2011 10:46:46 AM PST by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

RP will never get near the White House.


29 posted on 12/09/2011 10:47:35 AM PST by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

“Ron Paul: 9/11 prompted “glee” in Bush administration”

should read...

“Nutty Ron Paul anti-Bush statement prompted “Glee” in left wing media”


30 posted on 12/09/2011 10:48:02 AM PST by Londo Molari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Nuttier than squirrel poo.

Which is a shame, because this trainwreck of a foreign policy reduces the legitimacy of the real points he has on spending issues. (Minus earmarks to his own district, of course.)


31 posted on 12/09/2011 10:48:28 AM PST by kevkrom (Separation of Business and State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

When it comes to terrorism, Ron Paul is just another naive bleeding heart liberal.


32 posted on 12/09/2011 10:49:45 AM PST by larryleo (We all need to get Newtered!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

OMG! He said whaaaaaat ?????


33 posted on 12/09/2011 10:53:20 AM PST by Walrus (Big media is the natural enemy of liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

This guy is a whack job! Anyone else feel that he’s damaging his son’s reputation via DNA? The “Paul” family name may end up being synonymous with craziness, thereby hurting Rand.


34 posted on 12/09/2011 10:57:33 AM PST by sanjuanbob (Festina Lente)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

That Ron Perot, er Paul would be a great choice at the top of the ticket. I hear he wants Admiral Stockdale as his running mate.


35 posted on 12/09/2011 10:58:00 AM PST by The Iceman Cometh (Proud Teabagging Barbarian Terrorist Hobbit Son-of-a-Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
I'll vote for ANYBODY* other than Obama for president.







*Except Ron Paul.
36 posted on 12/09/2011 10:58:53 AM PST by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Ron Paul campaign theme music has just been changed to “Send in the Clowns.”


37 posted on 12/09/2011 10:59:06 AM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemies of freedom. We have ideas-the Dems only have ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
I don't use profanity a lot; but Ron Paul is a traitorous bastard for those comments.
Absolutely traitorous comments to make about the good folks in charge when this happened.
Of course the Bush folks were not perfect; no one is.

But to say they reacted “with glee” after our nation was attacked, and more lives were lost than at Pearl Harbor; is traitorous.

Ari is too nice to use the word nuts. Traitor should be used.

38 posted on 12/09/2011 11:02:33 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (I love how the FR spellchecker doesn't recognize the word "Obama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

The people who support Ron Paul are liberal pot smoking young people. The drug issue is the ONLY reason that young liberals support him. Otherwise he’s just an old kook that nobody even listens to. PS..there are a lot of young pot smokers out there and that’s why he makes these outlandish statements.


39 posted on 12/09/2011 11:02:55 AM PST by sanjuanbob (Festina Lente)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mnehring; Servant of the Cross
Hmmm...wonder where the sanctimonious Ron Paul defenders are? I'd like to hear their defense of this remark.

They have a defense of this, right?

40 posted on 12/09/2011 11:03:16 AM PST by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-238 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson