Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi plans to reveal information about Gingrich 'when the time is right'
The Hill ^

Posted on 12/05/2011 9:39:52 AM PST by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-273 next last
To: AdamBomb

Newt’s got plenty of ammo to go after Nancy with, Nancy may not want to get into a pissing contest with Newt, if she knows what’s good for her.


121 posted on 12/05/2011 10:22:45 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; SpinnerWebb
Pelosi plans to reveal information about Gingrich 'when the time is right'

Another cunning stunt from Botox Girl

122 posted on 12/05/2011 10:22:57 AM PST by tx_eggman (Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Some of us should be called pussy willows instead of Freepers.

“Help I’m scared of the democrats all our candidates are no good oh woe is me!”

Good God brace yourselves!


123 posted on 12/05/2011 10:23:36 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What he do Nasty Nancy? Hit on you?


124 posted on 12/05/2011 10:24:16 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarmichaelPatriot
“...She’s already had her life and background fully exposed and there’s no there there...”

I hope you are right but I thought when she decided not to run that there must be another skeleton or two yet confirmed. Todd's reaction to the cocaine story was to slam the nasty tactics but he did not say that they had never touched the stuff.

I would have supported Sarah in spite of past mind-altering experimentation and sexual adventures but something seemed to really spook her. I don't know what.

125 posted on 12/05/2011 10:25:17 AM PST by Monterrosa-24 (...even more American that a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Let her say what she wants. Newt Gingrich was never found guilty of any ethics violations. Thats all that counts.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Puh-leaze. Might as well say “Herman Cain was never found guilty of any sexual harrassment charges. Thats all that counts.”


126 posted on 12/05/2011 10:25:17 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Gingrich will be worse than McCain.

Rubbish. At the very least, Gingrich will not be afraid to punch back and call Obama out. McCain was too much of a "gentleman" to point out Obama's flaws. Also, McCain had no ideas, except to get along with the Democrats.

There is NO comparison between Gingrich and McCain.

127 posted on 12/05/2011 10:26:30 AM PST by Maceman (Obama: As American as nasei goreng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Newt -

You laid down with dogs, and you got fleas.


128 posted on 12/05/2011 10:26:44 AM PST by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

They ALL write books while the country goes to hell.


129 posted on 12/05/2011 10:27:16 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Nancy is picking the wrong battle...


130 posted on 12/05/2011 10:27:37 AM PST by AdamBomb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
This is just one more reason why Newt sitting on the love seat with Nancy Pelosi campaigning for all Gore's global warming program was stupid.

The Washington establishment considers Newt a pathetic joke. They forced him out of of the Speakership and ridiculed him constantly. Yet, Newt still cares more about the Washington insiders than he does the honest Americans who are struggling.

131 posted on 12/05/2011 10:28:16 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melchior

When you talk to political hacks or hags like Pelosi, they all think they know something, snicker, snicker, about the other party’s candidate.

Then when they tell you, it’s hard to stay awake.


132 posted on 12/05/2011 10:28:45 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Well, yeah. But here we are.


133 posted on 12/05/2011 10:28:55 AM PST by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Newt. You've been a bad boy.
Mommy's going to have to teach you a lesson.

134 posted on 12/05/2011 10:29:06 AM PST by McGruff (Hold the House, retake the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
As I understand it, Newt Gingrich pled under the terms of an agreement. If Nancy Pelosi was part of the committee which negotiated and entered into that agreement I would be very surprised if she were not bound by restrictions on the release of statements, documents, and testimony.

If so, and Nancy breaches such an agreement or otherwise violates a rule of the house concerning the conduct of members of the ethics committee, she could be subject to censure.


135 posted on 12/05/2011 10:29:11 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

File a Freedom of Information suit and get those docs. Now.


136 posted on 12/05/2011 10:29:31 AM PST by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarmichaelPatriot

They only just began on Palin. You don’t think they would waste it all on a Veep candidate or someone who isn’t running, do you?

Thy will dig up or make up every little thing they can on any of them.

Thing is, when are the media folks on our side going to quit being too scared to give Larry Sinclair attention?

Our media side doesn’t go after Obama full bore as they should.


137 posted on 12/05/2011 10:29:53 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“How stupid can Republican primary voters get?”

Bob Dole stupid? John McCain stupid? I guess we’re just succers for a pretty face?


138 posted on 12/05/2011 10:30:13 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

I need to review the (IMHO) trumped up ethics and tax violation charges that were leveled against Newt in the late 90’s. I.am reasonably certain that the tax charges were dismissed.

If we have any real Newt History buffs here at FR a nice summary/reminder of the events that led to Newt’s “downfall” would be nice.


139 posted on 12/05/2011 10:30:50 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

You are a mystery......but oh....so......right!


140 posted on 12/05/2011 10:30:50 AM PST by PALIN SMITH (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-273 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson