Posted on 12/02/2011 1:53:39 PM PST by IbJensen
CNSNews.com) (Updated) The Senate on Thursday evening voted 93-7 to approve a defense authorization bill that includes a provision which not only repeals the military law on sodomy, it also repeals the military ban on sex with animals--or bestiality.
On Nov. 15, the Senate Armed Services Committee had unanimously approved S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes a provision to repeal Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
Article 125 of the UCMJ makes it illegal to engage in both sodomy with humans and sex with animals.
It states: "(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense. (b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said the effort to remove sodomy from military law stems from liberal Senate Democrats' and President Obamas support for removing the militarys Dont Ask Dont Tell policy.
Its all about using the military to advance this administrations radical social agenda, Perkins told CNSNews.com. Not only did they overturn Dont Ask Dont Tell, but they had another problem, and that is, under military law sodomy is illegal, just as adultery is illegal, so they had to remove that prohibition against sodomy.
Perkins said removing the bestiality provision may have been intentional--or just collateral damage
Well, whether it was inadvertent or not, they have also taken out the provision against bestiality, he said. So now, under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), theres nothing there to prosecute bestiality."
Former Army Col. Bob Maginnis said some military lawyers have indicated that bestiality may be prosecutable under another section of the military code of justice the catch-all Article 134 for offenses against good military order and discipline.
But don't count on that, he said.
If we have a soldier who engages in sodomy with an animal whether a government animal or a non-government animal is it, in fact, a chargeable offense under the Uniform Code? I think thats in question, Maginnis told CNSNews.com.
When the reader stops laughing, the reader needs to ask the question whether or not this is in the best interests of the government, in the best interests of the military and the best interests of the country? I think not.
He added: Soldiers, unfortunately, like it or not, have engaged in this type of behavior in the past. Will they in the future, if they remove this statute? I dont know.
Perkins said there was no attempt to remove the UCMJ repeal provision from the bill, which Perkins had expected the Senate to approve.
Now that it has passed, however, the Senate version will have to go to a conference committee, and Perkins predicts there will be several sticking points with the House.
The House in their version of the defense authorization, reinforced the Defense of Marriage Act, saying that there is a military DOMA as well, prohibiting same-sex marriage on military bases something the Department of Defense is pushing for, he said.
And now this is an added concern, that sodomy has been removed, and as we have discovered, that bestiality--the prohibition against it--has been removed from the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So yes, the House will have problems with this bill.
You’ll have to tie up the senators and gag them. The only way to move them out is with their kicking and screaming all the way...
Ok, when does the secession start?
Maybe somebody should s*d*mize them, to give them a taste of what they just voted for.
If he did, maybe he has a farm animal stashed away in his basement...
The problem is that the definition of “rape” in the UCMC includes only “sexual intercourse.” http://usmilitary.about.com/library/milinfo/ucmj/blart-120.htm
I hope there’s a separate crime that includes forcible sodomy, such as “sexual assault” or something, or else the repeal of sodomy as a crime in the UCMC will mean that forcible sodomy won’t be a crime in the military.
Additionally, since it’s okay to commit barracks sodomy it’s likewise permissible to ingest fecal matter. Part of the perversion that homosexuals call lovemaking includes shoving their faces up a partners ass.
The first time a legitimate soldier sees something like the coupling of two men in HIS barracks he’ll beat the fecal matter out of them!
For those whose votes allow this evil nothing short of tar, feathers and banishment is good enough! They have proved that the entire Congress is so coated with evil that it must be abolished!
Muslims have always been an inventive and civilized people who never got enough credit for the contributions they have made to society.
In the year 1425 they invented the condom using the lower intestine of the sheep.
Not until 1857 were any alterations made to this invention when the British decided to remove the lower intestine from the animal.
How can any government that codifies homosexual acts in the military have ANY moral authority to govern? Even Jim Demint voted for this. To Hell with all of them, It is time for the Civil War.
So did Florida’s own Marco Rubio.
Agreed. I’ll fight under the Stars and Bars, while the other side wimps under the flag they desecrated by wiping their ass on it!
93 - 7
I'll be right there with you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.