Posted on 11/16/2011 6:31:19 PM PST by circumbendibus
A hearing is scheduled in front of the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission on Friday to hear a complaint filed by Orly Taitz, with the apparent support of two state lawmakers, that raises allegations of fraudulent documents and fraudulent Social Security Number use on the part of Barack Obama.
The hearing is scheduled Friday at 2 p.m. in Room 307 of the New Hampshire Legislative Office Building and Taitz is encouraging the public to be present.
The state holds the first primary for presidential elections, and that is scheduled for Jan. 10, 2012.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHDl1eE5bAE&feature=related
Obama was not a 14th amendment citizen, even if he was born on the White House steps. The SCOTUS told us why in WKA.
Thanks for the ping, and have a great Thanksgiving too!
Thanx, I was in a hurry as you can tell by my typos.....I get pissed too every time I open this thread....
I watched the video. Yet another injustice being committed against the United States of America. Glad to see you did not lose it and end up in the cooler for bopping someone.
RE: Birther panic at the disco: NH Ballot Commission remix
have you seen this? Posted in the comments section of the video...
Dear Representatives Accornero, DeLemus and Baldasaro: I have just had a meeting with Attorney General Delaney
concerning the Ballot Law Commission hearing on November 18. He is concerned over how members of the House conducted themselves during and following the hearing ... . I am requesting that the Chief of Protective Services, Randy Joyner, conduct an investigation of the incident and provide a written report to me. Sincerely, William L. O’Brien Speaker of the House
live links to both videos - for the record
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=BUcyb5pmUKI
Orly Taitz vs NH Ballot Law Commission Obama Birth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHDl1eE5bAE&feature=related
Birther panic at the disco: NH Ballot Commission remix
The government scum will probably never understand that we the people care about the rule of law. The concept is totally inconceivable to them. Sort of like Pelosi griping about Catholics because they have consciences. She just can’t fathom that there are some human beings who still have a soul.
When responding to blatant public evidence by requesting an investigation of social security fraud, forgery, perjury, and election fraud is “extreme” it tells you what the status quo is. And the scum who live off the lawless status quo will never understand why any of us have a problem with it.
You are so right..
I don't get your post - the holding in WKA was that he was a citizen under the 14th Amendment. But, SCOTUS totally evaded the question of Ark's claim to be a NBC.
The holding was:
The evident intention, and the necessary effect, of the submission of this case to the decision of the court upon the facts agreed by the parties were to present for determination the single question stated at the beginning of this opinion, namely, whether a child born in the United States, of parent of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States. For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative.
The question at the beginning of the opinion is:
The question presented by the record is whether a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution ...
Ark, NOT Obama, satisfied the subject clause of the 14th amendment because his parents had permanent residence and domicil in the United States. This is contained in both the question at the beginning and in the holding. It's not irrelevant to the holding. Obama's parents did not have permanent residence and domicil in the United States. When Barack Sr. was told to go back to Kenya, had Obama's mama not divorce him, she and Bari would have been sent back to Kenya along with him.
So SAD was looking at deportation? That's why the hurried divorce of a marriage that didn't take place.
by Cody Robert Judy, Presidential Candidate
(Nov. 19, 2011) — The following letter was sent to the New Hampshire Attorney General’s office, Fox News, the Drudge Report, and many other news outlets: [But you won't see it at those locations]
Dear New Hampshire DOJ Election Law:
Thank you for your consideration of my letter/complaint. I am a candidate for office in the same party, and the same position as Barack Obama. Thus the argument of partisan politics does not enter into consideration of my complaint.
First let me say, I knew Mrs. Orly Taitz would have the problem of the Law Commission 11-18-2012, 2 pm hearing, saying they did not have jurisdiction over criminal matters when she brought up the alleged Social Security Number fraud and Fraudulent or Forged long form Birth Certificate.
However let me say, cooler thought prevailing, the criminal aspect of the allegations need not be considered to warrant prohibition on the Primary Ballot in the interest of protecting the Voter in the Primary Election from wasting a vote on a constitutionally unqualified candidate.
I hope my letter/complaint exhibits Barack Obama by his own release of his long form B.C. showed all of us, he was not eligible by the standards of a Natural Born Citizen showing his father is not a Citizen of the United States but is listed as a “Kenya, East Africa” at the time of Obama’s birth.
Of course this is in no way exhibited as a “racially prejudice fact”, but as a “disqualification fact” that is based on demand of our Constitution’s requirements for President, and this is the Supreme Law of the Land. These facts afford a removal from the Primary Ballot with the burden of further deliberation or review upon the candidate Barack Obama.
Obama holds by his own record and release of his Long Form Birth Certificate naturally a dual loyalty of inherited citizenship, which is forbidden by our Constitutions expressed demands for president as a Natural Born Citizen. This is a national security concern of voting citizens.
It does not need to be proven that it is forged or fraudulent. Obama’s Released Long form birth certificate appeals to the hard facts as prohibitory for running as a qualified candidate, or holding the office of President. If the intent of the Ballot Law Commission’s review is to prohibit unqualified candidates from the ballot in the interest of the qualifying standards of office demanded by We The People through our Constitution, Obama’s release of his long form birth certificate is where the facts come from that disqualifies him, and my witness stands against his qualification.
Excerpt from here at the Post & Email.
Well written Mr. Judy! And he has standing!!!
Emphasis and bracketed comment mine.
Judy v NHDOJ <<< Let us pray.
Good point. At first I was wondering what you were getting at. If Obama has citizenship at all, it is due to the workings of the 14th amendment.
The ‘divorce’ was applied for January 1964, finalized in March.
The first discussions at Harvard to deny any further extensions to the kenyan commenced in May, 1964.
See summary compiled by matt1234 here
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2712867/posts?page=1
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.