Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919; Fred Nerks
When Barack Sr. was told to go back to Kenya, had Obama's mama not divorce him, she and Bari would have been sent back to Kenya along with him.

So SAD was looking at deportation? That's why the hurried divorce of a marriage that didn't take place.

274 posted on 11/23/2011 4:05:00 AM PST by GregNH (One Pissed Off Natural Born Citizen OPONBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]


To: circumbendibus; TheConservativeParty; Seizethecarp; rxsid; LucyT; Jet Jaguar; Lady Jag; ...
IS THERE NO APPEAL FOR ITS DECISIONS?

by Cody Robert Judy, Presidential Candidate

(Nov. 19, 2011) — The following letter was sent to the New Hampshire Attorney General’s office, Fox News, the Drudge Report, and many other news outlets: [But you won't see it at those locations]

Dear New Hampshire DOJ Election Law:

Thank you for your consideration of my letter/complaint. I am a candidate for office in the same party, and the same position as Barack Obama. Thus the argument of partisan politics does not enter into consideration of my complaint.

First let me say, I knew Mrs. Orly Taitz would have the problem of the Law Commission 11-18-2012, 2 pm hearing, saying they did not have jurisdiction over criminal matters when she brought up the alleged Social Security Number fraud and Fraudulent or Forged long form Birth Certificate.

However let me say, cooler thought prevailing, the criminal aspect of the allegations need not be considered to warrant prohibition on the Primary Ballot in the interest of protecting the Voter in the Primary Election from wasting a vote on a constitutionally unqualified candidate.

I hope my letter/complaint exhibits Barack Obama by his own release of his long form B.C. showed all of us, he was not eligible by the standards of a Natural Born Citizen showing his father is not a Citizen of the United States but is listed as a “Kenya, East Africa” at the time of Obama’s birth.

Of course this is in no way exhibited as a “racially prejudice fact”, but as a “disqualification fact” that is based on demand of our Constitution’s requirements for President, and this is the Supreme Law of the Land. These facts afford a removal from the Primary Ballot with the burden of further deliberation or review upon the candidate Barack Obama.

Obama holds by his own record and release of his Long Form Birth Certificate naturally a dual loyalty of inherited citizenship, which is forbidden by our Constitutions expressed demands for president as a Natural Born Citizen. This is a national security concern of voting citizens.

It does not need to be proven that it is forged or fraudulent. Obama’s Released Long form birth certificate appeals to the hard facts as prohibitory for running as a qualified candidate, or holding the office of President. If the intent of the Ballot Law Commission’s review is to prohibit unqualified candidates from the ballot in the interest of the qualifying standards of office demanded by We The People through our Constitution, Obama’s release of his long form birth certificate is where the facts come from that disqualifies him, and my witness stands against his qualification.

Excerpt from here at the Post & Email.

Well written Mr. Judy! And he has standing!!!

Emphasis and bracketed comment mine.

275 posted on 11/23/2011 4:32:26 AM PST by GregNH (One Pissed Off Natural Born Citizen OPONBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

To: GregNH; edge919; matt1234

The ‘divorce’ was applied for January 1964, finalized in March.

The first discussions at Harvard to deny any further extensions to the kenyan commenced in May, 1964.

See summary compiled by matt1234 here

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2712867/posts?page=1


280 posted on 11/23/2011 12:35:32 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

To: GregNH

I can’t say this was the cause of the divorce. I was only speaking about the way the law is applied by the courts in a legal challenge (Diaz-Salazar vs. INS), which provides no protection to the children despite being claimed as “natural-born citizens.”


287 posted on 11/25/2011 8:43:50 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson