Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flashback: Gingrich Backs Obamacare's Individual Mandate Requiring Health Insurance
Newsmax ^ | 15 May 2011 | staff

Posted on 11/15/2011 11:17:24 AM PST by BarnacleCenturion

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Sunday that he strongly supports a federal mandate requiring citizens to buy health insurance – a position that has been rejected by many Republicans, including several who likely will be running against him for the Republican presidential nomination.

Appearing on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Gingrich told host David Gregory that he continues to advocate for a plan he first called for in the early 1990s as a Congressman, which requires every uninsured citizen to purchase or acquire health insurance.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cainbots; gingrich4obama; gingrichtruthfile; healthcare; hermancain; mandate; mittromney; newtgingrich; rickperry; rino; romneybots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: NFHale

Enjoyed your reply. Thanks.
SJB.


81 posted on 11/15/2011 2:08:02 PM PST by sanjuanbob (Festina Lente)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: sanjuanbob

Hey brother, one team, one fight!!!

For the record, I don’t miss those folks. Thought I knew them, but...

When you have and hold to principles, you discover who your real friends are, real fast.


82 posted on 11/15/2011 2:09:54 PM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3

“...how about sighting in on the lawyers ???...”

Ohh...Wait...you said REIGNING in the lawyers...

Sorry...that slipped out...I don’t know WHAT came over me... :^)


83 posted on 11/15/2011 2:11:30 PM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

There’s drawing threads together and then there’s fantasies to advance an agenda.

You still haven’t convinced me that a Freshman Republican Congressman in a Democrat Congress whipped up the votes to pass the bill. If he did that I’m sure there would be interviews or whatever from that time with people praising Newt or acknowledging his part in the passage. If you want me to pull the threads together, you’re going to have to supply the last thread.


84 posted on 11/15/2011 2:13:18 PM PST by Mari2525
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: BoingBoing

Wow. That’s educational.


85 posted on 11/15/2011 2:13:22 PM PST by PjhCPA (Anybody but Obama or Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Well said! From many aspects.


86 posted on 11/15/2011 2:17:34 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
It's now time to get all conservatives to DESTROY NEWT!!!

Mitt is the only option /s.

87 posted on 11/15/2011 2:18:42 PM PST by Tribune7 (If you demand perfection you will wind up with leftist Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez

How does that square with his support for an individual mandate?

Apart from the constitutional question, it concerns me that Newt apparently was unaware of just how deeply the individual mandate was opposed by the American people, particularly conservatives.

Does it concern you that Newt supports and finds no problem with an individual mandate to purchase health insurance, the same type of mandate that was key to Romneycare and Obamacare (actually Hillarycare, too — in fact, it’s key to all SOCIALIZED MEDICINE programs)?


88 posted on 11/15/2011 2:26:42 PM PST by fightinJAG (NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION! Everyone should pay taxes, everyone should pay the same rate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ez

P.S. I replied to your post, but if I missed the /s button, sorry!


89 posted on 11/15/2011 2:34:29 PM PST by fightinJAG (NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION! Everyone should pay taxes, everyone should pay the same rate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred
how he treated his wife that had cancer, etc, will bury him.

Just for your info, this is blatantly false and something I took as fact until this week.

90 posted on 11/15/2011 3:26:21 PM PST by itsahoot (There was a bloodless coup in 08, and no one seemed to notice. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred
From Wikipedia:

Gingrich has been married three times. In 1962, he married Jackie Battley, his former high school geometry teacher, when he was 19 years old and she was 26. In the spring of 1980, Gingrich left Battley after having an affair with Marianne Ginther. In 1984, Battley told the Washington Post that the divorce was a "complete surprise" to her. According to Battley, in September 1980, Gingrich and their children visited her while she was in the hospital, recovering from surgery, and Gingrich wanted to discuss the terms of their divorce. Gingrich has disputed that account.

In 2011, their daughter, Jackie Gingrich Cushman, said that it was her mother who requested the divorce, that it happened prior to the hospital stay (which was for the removal of a benign tumor, not cancer), and that Gingrich's visit was for the purpose of bringing the couple's children to see their mother, not to discuss the divorce.

91 posted on 11/15/2011 3:32:18 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mari2525

The DOE was established in the Carter administration. Undoing DOE was a major part of Ronald Reagan’s campaign. But Carter was convinced that the 55 MPH speed limit was the major cause of his defeat.:)

Strangely the double nickel was undone but not DOE.


92 posted on 11/15/2011 3:35:01 PM PST by itsahoot (There was a bloodless coup in 08, and no one seemed to notice. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Seems to be a lot of tearer-downers and very few builder-uppers.


93 posted on 11/15/2011 3:43:10 PM PST by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction
Newt’s analogy is not a good one.

Here is a better one. You already pay a tax for healthcare just like you pay for uninsured motorists.

You carry uninsured motorists policy to protect you from being damaged by an uninsured motorist, but if you have a claim agains an uninsured motorists, it is charged against your insurance which raises your rate.

When and insured patines goes to the hospital the insurance is over billed to make up for the patient who doesn't have insurance, it has been an open policy that I know of for at least 60 years.

Example I had some stints put in at a Blue Cross provider Hospital, that means they have contracted with Blue Cross to accept whatever is reasonable and customary. Blue Cross was billed $106.000.00 for the procedure they paid $6,000.00 and I was responsible for none of the over charge.

There is the real problem chew on that.

94 posted on 11/15/2011 3:44:22 PM PST by itsahoot (There was a bloodless coup in 08, and no one seemed to notice. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Health insurance is only for yourself, and is only “needed” because government refuses to let people die if they get sick,

Charles I think the government really wants people to die after they become unproductive, otherwise pretty good post.

95 posted on 11/15/2011 3:51:09 PM PST by itsahoot (There was a bloodless coup in 08, and no one seemed to notice. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

It’s false that he’s been married 3 times and cheated on his wife?


96 posted on 11/15/2011 4:14:59 PM PST by SideoutFred (B.O. Stinks...it really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

The real problem is that O-Care forces me to fund abortion.

If Newt’s in favor of me paying for other people to have an abortion, all I can say is, “Say it ain’t so, Joe”. I won’t.

Toss me in jail if you want, but I will not fund it. Not now, not ever.


97 posted on 11/15/2011 4:17:37 PM PST by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Yes, cost shifting to pay for people who are irresponsible is a problem. But a different problem from the Constitutionality of a federal individual mandate.


98 posted on 11/15/2011 4:22:21 PM PST by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

This is vintage Newt, and the reason why, even though he can uncork sound statements, he doesn’t truly get it and I can’t support him.


99 posted on 11/15/2011 4:28:40 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Obyema 2012 - he has addition deficit disorder... (not my line, but a great one to repeat))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #100 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson