Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada may buy nuclear submarines
CBC News ^ | Oct 27, 2011 | Greg Weston

Posted on 10/28/2011 7:42:27 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 10/28/2011 7:42:27 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

PLEASE DONATE


2 posted on 10/28/2011 7:43:32 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The four second-hand subs...

Is that the ones now at Edmonton mall or are these the only ones left "serviceable"?

3 posted on 10/28/2011 7:48:07 AM PDT by TexasRedeye (Eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Might be a good idea, except they’ll never be able to go to Vancouver if they do. Vancouver is a “nuclear-free zone”. Says so on signs at the city limits. No ship carrying nuclear material or powered by nukes is allowed in the city.

Vancouver: Beautiful city, populated by morons.


4 posted on 10/28/2011 7:50:33 AM PDT by hoagy62 (The United States of America. Great idea...while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Ping.


5 posted on 10/28/2011 7:51:21 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Does that include Esquimault BC where the base is?


6 posted on 10/28/2011 7:53:35 AM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

I think it’s just Vancouver proper. However, all the anti-nuke enviro-peace-nuts will certainly squeal that “It’s too close!” or some idiotic statement like that.


7 posted on 10/28/2011 7:56:05 AM PDT by hoagy62 (The United States of America. Great idea...while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Having proved they lack the industrial and technical skills to keep a diesel electric submarine operating for any length of time I don’t see how jumping to nuclear power is going to somehow fix that problem.


8 posted on 10/28/2011 7:57:10 AM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
Having proved they lack the industrial and technical skills to keep a diesel electric submarine operating for any length of time I don’t see how jumping to nuclear power is going to somehow fix that problem.

Well, the subs were British: Lucas Electrics was probably involved somehow.

9 posted on 10/28/2011 8:10:03 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Canada depends on being under the U.S. Nuclear Umbrella..
Thats, Why they spend so little (of their economy) on the military..
Most all of Canada’s expenditures are to keep their socialism going..

Truth is Canada does not need submarines at all..
A very small Navy, Air Force, and Army is for propaganda purposes..
Like a Cat puffing up.. to seem bigger.


10 posted on 10/28/2011 8:13:56 AM PDT by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...

Thank you for the ping, Army Air Corps.


11 posted on 10/28/2011 8:18:04 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grut

This story ran on CBC The National last night.

Seems that they have spent more that $3B maintaining
these to date. I guess they didn’t realize how expensive
keeping these boats really is. The reason for having them
is to assert sovreignity over the the Far North. They know that our boomer can hide out up there and they don’t like it and would like to be able to chase US subs out of there. Of course, theres no chance to do that without having nuke boats.


12 posted on 10/28/2011 8:32:59 AM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile
>>>>>>The reason for having them is to assert sovreignity over the the Far North. <<<<<

That was also the reason for purchase of F-35 fleet. The small problem is that F-35 can not communicate in the far north,nor have needed operation radius for such task. But hey, what's $100B from my or your pocket for idiots in charge. Especially if they get kickbacks for merchandise no one else wants to buy.

It seems Canadian government has a pattern of spending billions on useless military hardware and spending billions to murder innocent civilians around the world. At the same time Search and rescue from Canadian waters is one of the worst in developed world, Canadian waters are not controlled and Canadian skies not defended.

13 posted on 10/28/2011 9:11:15 AM PDT by DTA (U.S. Centcom vs. U.S. AFRICOM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Snowmobiles......that’s the answer......snowmobiles.....as long as you keep the track turning fast, they’ll go over water. Strap a nuke to it and you have the perfect weapon. Lots of fun on the snow, too.


14 posted on 10/28/2011 9:38:05 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

so best mind the line when you’re out there fishing on Lake Huron, eh?


15 posted on 10/28/2011 10:02:37 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
A very small Navy, Air Force, and Army is for propaganda purposes..

I suggest you research all the fighter intercepts Canada has conducted in the past 60 years.

16 posted on 10/28/2011 9:27:50 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DTA
Canadian skies not defended.

I beg to differ on that point.

17 posted on 10/28/2011 9:30:00 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

“However, all the anti-nuke enviro-peace-nuts will certainly squeal that “It’s too close!” or some idiotic statement like that.”

Then they need their heads cracked. I’m sure the RCMP is up to the task. :)


18 posted on 10/29/2011 1:05:12 AM PDT by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; All

I see there are many still posting on FR that think they have all of the facts on Canada. Jokers.


19 posted on 10/29/2011 9:54:31 AM PDT by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Van Francisco.


20 posted on 10/29/2011 9:57:38 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson