Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The date on this article SHOULD read 10-20-2011. I should know. I wrote it.
1 posted on 10/20/2011 1:12:46 PM PDT by Danae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: Danae

My word, that “Examiner” sure is full of advertisements and pop-ups
and malware and spyware and viruses isn’t it? Scary place.

I’d never advise anyone to visit there.


2 posted on 10/20/2011 1:16:35 PM PDT by humblegunner (The kinder, gentler version...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Ron; little jeremiah; MestaMachine; STARWISE; rxsid; butterdezillion; Fred Nerks; ...

Ping


3 posted on 10/20/2011 1:18:08 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

Fantastic!


5 posted on 10/20/2011 1:20:03 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree ("Nanny Care State" is not a Division 3 football powerhouse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

Just Wow!


6 posted on 10/20/2011 1:22:24 PM PDT by AmericaUnite (Jesus bent down and began to write on the ground with his finger. John Ch 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

How interesting. Interesting indeed. One of my favorite books is “1984”, and here it is in real life!


8 posted on 10/20/2011 1:22:44 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

Question for you, how does this apply to John McCain? As I understand it, he was born in a US territory, on a US Armed Forces base, in a US Armed Forces hospital.


13 posted on 10/20/2011 1:27:14 PM PDT by MS from the OC (Obama foreign policy"If you're an enemy we're sorry; if you're a friend, you're sorry" Abe Greenwald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae; humblegunner
It makes my brain hurt reading the facts of this issue. Your article (and it associated links) could stand alone as a brief to the SCOTUS. And not one jurist on the planet could dissent with all those facts and case law precedents.

The cover-up is meticulous and unbelievable. Unfortunately, the media has ridiculed the issue from top to bottom, and most people have moved on. I have been following Donofrio since before the 2008 elections -- the poor bastard just doesn't have a chance even though he is standing on firm legal ground.

Nicely written, but painful to ponder. Thanks for posting it here.

...and ignore humblegunner -- he hasn't learned how to install ad blockers on his browser yet. Maybe some day.

15 posted on 10/20/2011 1:32:00 PM PDT by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae
In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a "native or natural-born citizen" as a person born in the US to parents who were citizens; a definition which excludes from eligibility both Barack Obama and John McCain.

Great stuff, Danae. I've been stating this for awhile ever since another FReeper made me go research the whole "natural born" stuff. The Founders borrowed the concept of "natural born" from the British "natural" law. Under "natural law", the majority citizenship is passed from the status of the father. If the father is a natural born citizen, the majority of the child's citizenship comes from the father, with the remainder coming from the mother's citizenship. As with Obama, we know the rest and his citizenship status (as is his eligibility to be POTUS) is non-existant.

However, I do have to pick a nit with you over McCain's citizenship. McCain was born in Panama (IIRC) on an American military base. Military bases on foreign soil, like American embassies, are considered American soil. Since McCain's father and mother were natural born citizens of the US, McCain's American citizenship is assured.

20 posted on 10/20/2011 1:41:32 PM PDT by DustyMoment (Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

I am thoroughly incensed. So, what can we do about it?

FTA: Meanwhile, at the “Supreme Court Center” of the influential legal research website Justia.com, efforts were underway corrupting at least 25 Supreme Court cases by erasing references to the words “Minor V. Happersett” along with references to other relevant cases on the issue along with the insertion of misleading numerical ciations. And In two documented cases actual text was removed.

Who did it, and who is going to be prosecuted?

BTW, I read the entire article at The Examiner and did not get one single pop up. Thanks for posting.


25 posted on 10/20/2011 1:45:48 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae
"In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a "native or natural-born citizen" as a person born in the US to parents who were citizens"

Correct. But the Supreme Court did not limit the definition to that.

"At common-law ... it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts."
-- MINOR v. HAPPERSETT, 88 U.S. 162 (1874)

29 posted on 10/20/2011 1:47:51 PM PDT by misterwhite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae
This case does NOT resolve the issue. From the case:

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [88 U.S. 162, 168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.

Whether "natural born citizens" includes children born within the borders without reference to the parents is in doubt but not resolved for purposes of this case.

30 posted on 10/20/2011 1:49:26 PM PDT by Armando Guerra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

placemarker bump


41 posted on 10/20/2011 2:09:57 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae; humblegunner

I just clicked the link and I get no virus alerts, no spyware, no pop up ads. Why are you lying, bumble?


53 posted on 10/20/2011 2:28:58 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Spaulding; kristinn

Ping


61 posted on 10/20/2011 2:52:44 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

Incredible article, Danae. Thank you so much for all of the effort that went into producing it. I posted it to my Facebook wall.


70 posted on 10/20/2011 3:19:56 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

bm


73 posted on 10/20/2011 3:36:11 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

Discussion from July: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2742925/posts


87 posted on 10/20/2011 4:55:42 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae; butterdezillion

First Class Job Danae! If thsi doen’t shake a lot of people up the country is lost..

ping to Butter, this shows when it comes to Obama they will stop at nothing to cover up his a$$. It gives credence to everything birthers have alleged and thought all along.


110 posted on 10/20/2011 6:37:53 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae; Jet Jaguar; Lady Jag; Slings and Arrows; maggief; Dog; BP2; Candor7; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...

WOW, WE LIKE THE COMPANY YOU KEEP, DANAE!


134 posted on 10/20/2011 10:05:22 PM PDT by bitt ( Obama is so unpopular now that the Kenyans say he was definitely born in Hawaii)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae
Thanks for an outstanding piece of research. These fraudulent updates should result in criminal prosecutions.

This is the same sort of manipulation I found at the National Archives in 2004 when I was looking into the records of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War's "Winter Soldier" conference. All the summary documents showing the results of the Army investigations into the VVAW's war crimes allegations had vanished.

137 posted on 10/20/2011 10:50:28 PM PDT by Interesting Times (WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson