Long live the TEA party rebellion!! NO MORE RINOS!! NO ROMNEY, NO WAY!!

vanity | Oct 16, 2011 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

The TEA (Taxed Enough Already) party sprang up in spontaneous rebellion to big government's big spending, big taxing ways. TARP, the bailouts, the PORKULUS package and ObamaCare lit the fuse. TEA partiers support the constitution's limited government restrictions. TEA partiers are non-partisan, i.e., we oppose the big government, big spending, big taxing moves of both the major political parties.

This is an open rebellion against business as usual big spending, overreaching government! We demand a return to constitutionally limited government!!

The socialist/progressive Democrat party is our natural enemy and they understand that and attack us accordingly.

The big government RINO socialist/progressive wing of the Republican party is also our natural enemy and they attack us accordingly. They fear us, but they NEED us. They despise us, spit on us, call us right-wing extremists and hateful bigots, but beg us for our votes. They EXPECT us to bend over in the end and willingly accept their BIG GOVERNMENT candidates and programs without any real opposition.

Oh, they may try to sugar coat it a bit, and placate us here and there with some smooth talk, and toss us a bone from time-to-time with conservative head feints, but it's clear they have no intention of ever changing their evil progressive ways.

The progressive wing of the GOP does not really comprehend that the TEA party rebellion is aimed squarely at THEM!!

They believe that we have nowhere else to go and that fear of an Obama second term will compel us to vote for a Republican version of BIG GOVERNMENT, big spending, big taxing, constitution ignoring progressive liar of a candidate.

Got news for them.

The TEA party rebellion is made up of tens of millions of liberty-loving, patriotic citizens who are totally fed up with corrupt, lying, two-faced, smooth-talking, big government socialists, corrupt crony capitalist bastard, progressives, Marxists, etc, and it makes no difference to us which party they belong to. And we're madder than hell and loaded for bear!!

This is OPEN REBELLION at the ballot box!!

TEA party hating elite establishment, Romney, Rove & Co., had best get used to it. Your any RINO but Obama gig is up!!

The TEA party is here to stay and we're NOT going to vote for your big government, TARP pushing, PORKULUS pushing, RomneyCare pushing, gun-grabbing, abortionist, gay-rights pushing, global warming advocating, mandate-loving, anti-Reagan, anti-liberty, socialist/progressive, flavor of the day RINO, the chief architect and advocate of ObamaCare, Mitt Romney!!

FUMR!! FUGOP!!

TEA partiers unite against Obama/Romney!!

The progressive GOP be damned!!

Long live the Republic!!

[MizSterious]

So if we see things we find disturbing about Cain, we’re using scare tactics? Sheesh.

[Outlaw Woman]

Another thing I read the other nite was that someone had checked this guys church out and it was 100% black which is understandable however, the person said there were pro-Obama everywhere and it claimed it was 100% democrat. Now how can someone attend church and not object to that? Sounds like a familiar story. He was for Tarp and he is for ‘empowerment zones’ etc.

I tried to find the thread last nite and will look later for it. This is not a dead issue or a set issue.

Seems to me that this is the conservative edition of blindly voting for the color in spite of the facts.

This is FR right?

[MizSterious]

Do I hear clucking in the background? LOL! Personally, if I feel like saying something to someone, I’ll just say it.

[DJ MacWoW]

I respect Jim as the owner, Founder and ultimate authority of this site. . You don’t.

[DJ MacWoW]

I did say it.

You: Frankly, I’m not seeing many “Perry-bots” on the attack. Most of the agitators seem to be on Cain’s side.

Me: Bias has a way of blinding people.

What you want is a fight. Not playing.

Good day to you.

[altura]

Perry has never expressed a willingness to be Romney’s veep.

Cain has.

Perry has never attack Cain. Cain has praised Mitt not Perry. Mitt has praised Cain.

See a pattern? I do.

[MizSterious]

No, what you want is to say something ugly that no one can actually pin you down for. That way, if someone comes back at you, you can claim you were “misunderstood.” Ok. I got your game now. I don’t want a fight. You’re wrong about that. But manipulating via the vague snide comment is somewhat unseemly, wouldn’t you agree?

[presently no screen name]

at least Cain has the gonads to get the discussion out there

WOW!! He's groveling for the highest office in the land and he gets points for that? LOL! Amazing how little some settle for.

What else does he have to talk about? He will NOT criticize Romneycare - which every business owner and family are concerned about because it affects the job situation. Can't go after Mitt with a vengeance - that's a no no - it's not part of the plan.

And if you think the Dems will be the only ones using that tactic this election I have a bridge to sell you

Go sell your made up bridge to someone else and buy some smarts. And don't take seniors as some clueless citizens - moreso, when they are freepers. I'm sure they could teach you a thing or two - if you were teachable.

That senior citizen freeper is way ahead of you! She did her homework, called Cain asking how it affects those on fixed incomes - NO REPLY - and then came her with contact info for others to do the same. And yet your felt obligated to tell her to watch out for liberals. What a joke you are with your ignoring what she was asking about Cain and him not answering and you 'turn the subject' to warn her about liberals while adding - don't worry his plan won't take affect for a long time.

[altura]

Ha, ha. You live where cousins marry. That’s a good one.

I, too, have suffered abuse from the Cain supporters.

First, Cain turned me off of him for various reasons I’ve stated before.

Then his supporters have turned me way off him because they are hysterical, hateful, mean and off the charts vicious.

That is not the way to gain support for your candidate.

This battle is far worse than when pissant would get on Palin threads and diss her. Some of these Cain supporters make me long for pissant. (I’m sure he’s back under another name).

[TheOldLady]

Click the Pic               Thank you, JoeProBono

Gary Rushes to Harriet's House
He Misses Her and Can’t Stay Away

Follow the Exciting Adventures of Gary the Snail!

Abolish FReepathons
Go Monthly

If every FReeper and Lurker gave just $7 a month
We could end the FReepathons

[NotSoModerate]

My point is commie marxists are driven by fear, as you are. You’ll support anybody with an “R” next to their name because you’re scared of Obama. Fear blinds you, and causes you to lash out at anyone that doesn’t march to the Republican beat.

[AlwaysFrosty]

“I know. Watch - he will backtrack on that. As we already know - even his supporters tried dancing around that one - with covered clueless ears. And given a pass about the rock comment.”

This is what I'm talking about...there is not a single candidate we can't tear apart for things they have said, mistakes they have made, or opportunities they passed up. For example we can easily say (tongue in cheek)...
Mitt's a RINO
Perry can't debate
Paul is the quirky old uncle who says crazy things
Cain is politically inexperienced
MB gets facts mixed up
Newt has baggage
Huntsman uses a tanning bed (George Hamilton's twin?)
Santorum is whiny
Sure we can tear them all up because there is no perfect candidate, but let's start looking at the substantive issues they are raising. Let's consider whether or not they are now truly representing the kind of conservative positions and values we are willing to support. We need to be working hard with conservatives to push against the Mitt Campaign...that's the real target at this point. After the first few primaries thin out the field THEN get behind a common candidate by creating a HUGE wave that will carry him/her into the nomination and then into the White House!

[Eleutheria5]

I respect those who act in a manner deserving of respect. Jim as the owner, etc., of this site, can have my respect back whenever I think he deserves it. When he abuses his authority and/or power, he doesn’t get it, and I let my displeasure be known, albeit in publishable, decent American expatriate English. My respect for Jim is conditional. Yours is not, which makes you a sycophant, a lackey. I may or may not respect Jim himself tomorrow, but I will not respect you next week either. Run along.

[MizSterious]

I don’t mind pointing out what’s wrong with a R candidate, but several things I’m seeing here bother me a lot—for instance, I’m seeing inflated, and in some cases totally false things being said about some. That’s bad enough, but even worse are the folks who are so wrapped up in their candidate that any criticism at all is intolerable—and proof that the critic is a “moron” or “idiot” or worse.

You’re right. All of these guys have their warts and clay feet. Some lots worse than others—Romney, for instance has so many he’s not even in the running as far as I’m concerned. Paul is another. But I don’t go from thread to thread attacking people who support these and the other candidates.

Why can’t people just (a) keep the debate on the truthful side, and (b) criticize the candidate, not the Freeper supporter?

JimRob has a nice, tidy file on what’s wrong with Romney, and it’s documented. Maybe others should compile something like that for ALL the candidates, so that true comparisons can be made. Sure beats calling one another morons.

[presently no screen name]

It was mentioned a few or more posts up from yours about a youtube of his church and a lady in his congregation won some prize for having the best essay on Obama. I should reread it to repeat it exactly but seems you already know about it. It was news to me. This is like Part II of '08 - only worse.

Seems to me that this is the conservative edition of blindly voting for the color in spite of the facts.

It sure looks that way! It worked once and working again - why not use it. And many of them were so giddy to have one up on the media and their racist's remarks. The focus on the media shows a bit of choosing a candidate for reaction purposes for some.

[presently no screen name]

When he abuses his authority and/or power,

You are WAY over the line and your lack of decency and respect is beyond what I'd ever allow in my living room. You must somehow think you are special being void of important character traits and a big unruly mouth, I'm here to tell you - you're a nothing! And no one cares who you respect - your opinions have been deemed worthless.

I let my displeasure be known

Go have your tantrum somewhere else - you don't have servants here to clean up your mess.

[Eleutheria5]

I’m not the one throwing a tantrum here. I’ve told you what I think of Jim. I’ve told you what I think of WoW. I’ve told you why. Now I’m really done talking about this subject, and told WoW as much. If you must keep this going, I’ll tell you what I think of you. I base my statements on the facts, on reasoned arguments, and I don’t make personal attacks. See if you can do the same.

[DJ MacWoW]

I’d say “Shame on you” but you obviously have none. You’ll disrespect the owner of the forum but still use HIS venue. You are the worst kind of guest, lacking all grace and manners. You’ll use what isn’t yours while spitting on the host and complaining about HIS behavior. That’s called HYPOCRITE.

[presently no screen name]

We need to be working hard with conservatives to push against the Mitt Campaign

Perhaps, you haven't noticed but that is what this is about. You see, it's the candidates job who claim conservatism to attack Mitt - and get him out of the race. They are the ones seeking the Oval Office spot, not me. If they can't successfully do that - when he's ripe for the picking with bag full of attack-able points - they aren't fit for the job.

And the point is All the candidates are shying away from that task. Their focus is Perry.

So, IMO, the race is thinned out already - either we got some spineless candidates or they are there to buffer Mitt. So tell me - who are these conservatives you mention we should be working with to push hard against Mitt?

[presently no screen name]

I’ll tell you what I think of you.

You have a major problem if you think I care about your opinion of me. I already told you what I think of you and your 'droppings' in someone else's home. Well trained dogs don't even do that. You have shown you need a muzzle - your foam is dripping.

See if you can do the same.

I tell YOU what to do - YOU don't tell me. NO ONE would ever follow what you do. Now take your juvenile rebellious unteachable attitude against authority back to your own type.