Say “No” to Mitt Romney and the Corrupt Republican Establishment

The Post & Email ^ | October 12, 2011 | Lawrence Sellin

[Ordinary_American]

“NOTHING MORE THAN A STOOGE”

(Oct. 12, 2011) — Over one year ago, a Republican chairman from a major state told a constituent that the Party leadership had already been decided that Mitt Romney would be their nominee for President in 2012.

Just like it was McCain’s “turn” in 2008, it is Romney’s turn in 2012, and pending unforeseen circumstances, expect Mitt to get the nod.

The Republican leadership will also vigorously oppose any Republican “outsider” or Tea Party candidate with the same vitriol and dirty tricks as rabid Obama supporters, albeit done haughtily and deviously behind the scenes.

The Republican Party no longer believes in elections and does not trust the American people.

Likewise, the Republican establishment has already decided not to challenge Obama’s Constitutional ineligibility to be President.

According to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution and the Supreme Court binding precedent in Minor vs. Happersett (1874), Barack Hussein Obama has never been eligible to be President of the United States because he is not a natural born citizen, i.e., US born of two US citizen parents at the time of his birth.

The Republican Party no longer supports and defends the Constitution.

Despite the existence of overwhelming evidence, they will also not demand an investigation of Obama’s crimes: using a Social Security Number not issued to him and forging his birth documents and his Selective Service registration.

[sand88]

I will never vote for Mitt Romney. And there is absolutely nothing that will change that fact.

My feelings are exactly those. I truly loathe Mitt.

I pray after the 2012 election, that an effort is put forth to utterly destroy the GOP. We need a party for Conservatives and other non-Statists.

P.S. I still have great hope a conservative will win in 2012.

[msg-84]

What you call purist, others call principled. And Mitt Romney does not share conservative principles. He is the perfect candidate to marginalize the Tea Party. With a GOP nomination of Romney, the media will finally be vindicated in labeling the Tea Party as extremists - "He's a sensible Republican, favors gun control, global warming taxes and government run health care, unlike those fringe lunatics, the Tea Pary."

Unless you care about a candidate's kin color or religion, there is not a nickels worth of difference between the current president and Romney. If you think otherwise, then you don't know Mitt Romney.

[msg-84]

What you call purist, others call principled. And Mitt Romney does not share conservative principles. He is the perfect candidate to marginalize the Tea Party. With a GOP nomination of Romney, the media will finally be vindicated in labeling the Tea Party as extremists - "He's a sensible Republican, favors gun control, global warming taxes and government run health care, unlike those fringe lunatics, the Tea Party."

Unless you care about a candidate's kin color or religion, there is not a nickels worth of difference between the current president and Romney. If you think otherwise, then you don't know Mitt Romney.

[littlesorrel]

Three of like mind.

[Terry Mross]

Paging JimRob!

See my tagline

[Tex-Con-Man]

Again I ask...

“Ordinary_American”

Do you currently live in the U.S.?

Just curious...

[Jewbacca]

“If Romney = Nominee
Then Election = “End of Republican Party”

I tend to agree. I would certainly support a third-party candidate, even just to build a new, actually conservative party.

Mitt Robamalite is a non-starter.

[OldPossum]

I will never vote for Mitt Romney. And there is absolutely nothing that will change that fact.

Mrs. Old Possum and I agree with you. If the Republican Party can do no better than that it wlll deserve what it gets.

And if the American people are so brain dead as to political realities they too will get what they deserve.

[The Duke]

I hate voting for a Republican "good ol' boy" more than most folks, but I'm channeling my anger into getting MORE involved with the Republican Party until the day comes that the good ol' boy network no longer has the numbers (and, let's face it, Democracy is all about having the numbers, so we can't complain too much about that).

At our last Republican Executive Committee meeting it tore my heart out that, during our group elections, our Tea Party candidate for president of the chapter (the largest in Florida) did not unseat the current "establishment" president.

However, she *did* get 30% of the votes, and if I stick with it then next time it'll be more - maybe enough to win.

This is not a fair weather war we are in the midst of. And, if we get knocked down we better think of a better response than "taking our ball and going home". We'd better dust off our britches and get back into the game.

And that's exactly what I intend to do - even if the change is years in the making. I invite other true conservatives to join me in this!

[gunnyg]

Long way to go yet, and I don’t see things getting any better—unhappy people in both potties, but then they’re really the same anyway—all these unhappy folks could easily, eventually, merge over to a third candidate...just maybe...

Semper Watching!
*****

[Flotsam_Jetsome]

Dude. Don’t know if I’ve mentioned this before, but IMHO a clear majority of your posts are awesomely awesome. LOL
Thanks for those images. They went a long way toward redeeming what has otherwise been a rather bad day. The Romney “Mini Me” is priceless.

FJ