Posted on 10/03/2011 12:57:47 PM PDT by montag813
AMANDA KNOX ACQUITTED, TO BE RELEASED IMMEDIATELY
I guess you know all tghen don’t you, then tell me why her bloody footprint was in the room near the victim with a cut throat, go on please do, oh and tell me o wise one about why she kept changing her story, said she was not there when clearly she was even the judge off FOX is saying she knows something and was there and tell me then why did she admit to it until her expensive lawyers turned up and told her to change her story again?
Go on then and I’ll leave my computer on seeing as you know so frigging much then
ARF
So, she’s been found innocent now. What does that have to do with you slandering people who believed her guilty AFTER being convicted in court as a “guilty until proven innocent” crowd? Who exactly am I a “hater” of, btw?
“Then why is there almost always a comment of how they wish their teacher slept with them?”
People trying to be funny maybe, I don’t know.
Source? Oh wait is the source your fave prosecutor who thinks everything is a satanic sex ritual? Reality, feel free to partake of it.
you said I know nothing then explain to me how her bloodied foot was next to the woman who had her throat slit.
Explain why she said she did it until her expensive lawyers told her to recant her statement.
Explain why she kept changing her story.
You said I know nothing then tell me the answers to those questions and have you not noticed yet why our media does not go into any of the above and the details about her?
Also the prosecutor is not on trial for murder here she is and I will admit her PR firm did a great job for her.
It wasn't. Despite the police announcing it in the press, when it came to trial the defense was able to obtain reports from the prosecution that showed there was no bloody footprint matching Knox. You can read the details here
Explain why she said she did it until her expensive lawyers told her to recant her statement.
Got a source for that?
Ok so why did the judge off FOX have the reports in his hand and say there was her bloodied foot print next to the body.
Either way what ever we think we will never know for sure, hell some think Casey Anthony is innocent, OJ was framed.
The only person who knows is dead and a couple of others which one is about to make millions.
I didn't see it, but he was probably reading from the judge's initial verdict, in which he wholly accepted the prosecution's assertion that they found bloody footprints. That assertion was later blown out of the water during the appeals when the actual reports were released to the defense team. They showed that while there were footprints throughout the apartment the only ones that showed positive for blood matched Guede.
no he read from the courts papers he copied.
However she’ll make millions and she knows if she did it or not but I have to respect the PR what their family did and the local media in her district.
They made her look like she couldn’t hurt a flea.
Now you’re crying “slander”? Grow up. And stop the hate.
“The window was broke from the inside. Stuff thrown around the room was on top of the glass.”
Those two sentences appear to be contradictory. If the window was broken from the inside, the broken glass would be outside the window, not inside the bedroom.
Crying slander? You tagged a whole segment of the FR community with a label that is demonstrably false, and when the factual inaccuracy of it was pointed out to you, you offered no retraction. What else would you call that?
You still haven’t told me who I am “hating”, I’m waiting for that explanation...
Nice post, Condi!
Worth reading twice.
It never ceases to amaze me how gullible the media-raised children are.
Excellent post! You can see how far America has fallen when this girl is held up as a heroine.
AMANDA KNOX: THE NEW MUMIA!
by Ann Coulter
September 7, 2011
Despite liberals’ desperate need for Europeans to like them, the American media have enraged the entire nation of Italy with their bald-faced lies about a heinous murder in Perugia committed by a fresh-faced American girl, Amanda Knox.
The facts aren’t elusive: In December 2009, the Italian court released a 400-plus page report detailing the mountains of evidence that led the judges and jury to conclude that Knox, along with her Italian beau, Raffaele Sollecito, and a petty thief of her acquaintance, Rudy Guede, had murdered Knox’s English roommate, Meredith Kercher, on the evening of Nov. 1, 2007.
Now liberals are howling that the DNA evidence was “contaminated,” but they always say that. It wasn’t. And the DNA was already thoroughly vetted at trial.
Nonetheless, let’s consider only a tiny slice of the evidence available to the police in the first week after the murder — long before any DNA tests came back.
Murders and murder convictions obviously occurred before 1986 — the first time DNA was used in any criminal investigation — so it is possible to establish guilt with no DNA at all.
Knox’s first-of-several alibis for the night of the murder was that she was at her boyfriend (and co-defendant) Sollecito’s house all night, sound asleep until 10 a.m. the next morning.
A few days later, when that was proved false by telephone records, eyewitnesses and Sollecito’s admission that it was a lie, Knox claimed she was in the house during Meredith’s murder ... and she knew who the murderer was!
She said it was her boss, Patrick Lumumba, the owner of a popular bar in town:
“He wanted her. ... Raffaele and I went into another room and then I heard screams. ... Patrick and Meredith were in Meredith’s bedroom while I think I stayed in the kitchen. ... I can’t remember how long they were together in the bedroom, but the only thing I can say is that at a certain point I remember hearing Meredith’s screams and I covered my ears. ... I can’t remember if Meredith was screaming and if I heard thuds but I could imagine what was going on.”
Solely because of Knox’s claim that Lumumba murdered Meredith, he was arrested and sat in jail for two weeks before being released when the police discovered about a hundred eyewitnesses who could place him at his bar all night, the night of the murder.
If the police were intent on framing Knox for the murder, they were easily distracted by this wild goose chase.
Knox later said she falsely accused Lumumba only because the police wanted her to do so.
But absent Knox’s false accusation, there would have been no reason for the police to consider Lumumba a suspect in the first place. He was a successful entrepreneur in Perugia, married with a child, and had no connection whatsoever to the murdered girl.
Knox’s effort to frame an innocent man was nothing but a desperate attempt to throw suspicion off herself. In the process, she inadvertently revealed that she knew something only the police knew about the murder: that Meredith had also been sexually assaulted.
Police first came to the house the day after the murder to investigate a burglary in the bedroom of another roommate, Filomena Romanelli, that had been reported by Knox and Sollecito.
But the break-in turned out to be staged. Among many other reasons, glass from the broken window was on top of the piles of clothes thrown on the floor. (Always remember to break the window before trying to stage a burglary!)
Also, nothing had been stolen from Filomena’s room. Of course, that wasn’t known by anyone except the fake “burglar” until Filomena returned and determined her jewelry and other valuables were still there.
So it is especially telling that when Sollecito had called the police to report the “burglary” in two separate, recorded phone calls, he said nothing had been stolen — despite the fact that Filomena had not yet come home. The only way Sollecito would know nothing was stolen was if he had helped stage the burglary himself.
Also highly suspicious, when the police first arrived and Knox was the only roommate there, she lied to them, driving them away from Meredith’s locked bedroom door by assuring them that Meredith always locked her door, even to go to the bathroom.
So the police continued to investigate the alleged burglary and ignored Meredith’s room, until Filomena arrived, found out Meredith’s door was locked and demanded the police break it down, telling them — contra Knox — that Meredith never locked her door.
(excerpted)
“you said I know nothing then explain to me how her bloodied foot was next to the woman who had her throat slit.”
The only bloody footprints were Rudy Guede’s!
If you can’t figure it out, you’ll wait a long time.
Ann was as wrong about Amanda Knox as she was about Christie.
“On numerous other issues, Coulter seems to have no recent knowledge of the case but is repeating false ideas from three years ago.”
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/020638.html
“I have long been a fan of Ann Coulter, but she sometimes sticks her foot in her mouth.”
http://saberpoint.blogspot.com/2009/12/ann-coulter-is-wrong-on-amanda-knox.html
Lies and Misinformation:
http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/myths.html
The lead prosecuter, Giuliano Mignini:
http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/Mignini.html
Rudy Guede, the killer:
“All of the evidence at the crime scene pointed to Rudy Guede. Amanda and Raffaele left no evidence at the crime scene. Why? Because Amanda and Raffaele were not there.”
http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/Rudy.html
The Italian Justice System:
“Italy is to blame for allowing Giuliano Mignini to continue to prosecute cases. He was currently on trial for abuse of office when he was prosecuting Amanda and Raffaele’s trial. I am sorry but that is simply ridiculous.”
http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/Italianjustice.html
Click for more details regarding bra clasp, bloody footprints, knife, etc., on left side of page.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.