Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/27/2011 7:05:43 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Obama and his minions seem to think it would be great if they further pissed off the electorate by getting Kennedy to somehow cast a deciding vote in favor of ZeroCare!?!?

What are they smoking? Such a ruling would add at least 5% to the number of voters who will crawl across broken glass to cast the whole lot out on their asses.


2 posted on 09/27/2011 7:11:56 PM PDT by Bobalu (More rubble, less trouble)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Just heard on WABC that the court is not going to take it up


3 posted on 09/27/2011 7:12:18 PM PDT by YellowRoseofTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

They upheld Campaign Finance Reform the first time didn’t they?

SCOTUS is not reliable for us folks.


4 posted on 09/27/2011 7:12:47 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“... the government is confident that it’s going to prevail in the Supreme Court and would like to have a decision sooner rather than later,” former acting solicitor general Walter Dellinger told Politico.”

Why are they confident? Are they blackmailing SCOTUS?


5 posted on 09/27/2011 7:13:30 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

4) The full eleventh circuit would smack it down again with even more reasons.


6 posted on 09/27/2011 7:13:29 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The biggest reason of all for the Obummer to do this is that if the SC rules ObamaCare unconstitutional, that issue will be out of the way for the election. Of course, then he’ll have NO accomplishments, but at least the Republicans can’t bludgeon him with ObamaCare.


7 posted on 09/27/2011 7:13:46 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
The move shows confidence.

Asking for review of the 11th Circuit decision would have been widely interpreted as foot-dragging, the administration attempting to slow a case that’s almost inevitably headed to the Supreme Court. For the White House to proactively pursue a faster timeline makes the administration look more confident that it will prevail in court. “This confirms what I had already concluded: that the government is confident that it’s going to prevail in the Supreme Court and would like to have a decision sooner rather than later,” former acting solicitor general Walter Dellinger told Politico.(emph. added)

This last reason is either absurd political wishful thinking, OR

the White House knows something about Justice (dimwit) Kennedy's opinion on the matter that we don't know.

8 posted on 09/27/2011 7:14:16 PM PDT by PENANCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

If you dig deep into the comments, you find a little nugget about oboycare that might put a bite on paychecks prior the election that the regime might want to avoid, even up to and including the scuttling of their flagship cause


9 posted on 09/27/2011 7:15:27 PM PDT by lovesdogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

He thinks he will win.


10 posted on 09/27/2011 7:16:00 PM PDT by ThomasThomas ( Congressmen should wear uniforms like NASCAR drivers, so we can identify their corporate sponsors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

From the article:
“There are at least three reasons that could make a 2012 Supreme Court decision a more compelling one for the White House:”

“The Obama administration will definitely handle the case. Delaying a ruling until 2013 came with a big risk: a Republican administration could be in power, and arguing the case...”

“The review might not have been granted— or gone against the administration. Even if the United States had asked the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to hear the case, the court didn’t have to accept...”

“The move shows confidence. Asking for review of the 11th Circuit decision would have been widely interpreted as foot-dragging, the administration attempting to slow a case that’s almost inevitably headed to the Supreme Court...”


11 posted on 09/27/2011 7:19:21 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Chief Justice Roberst has an axe to grind over the State of the Union speech. Since the 11th has already ruled against it. Roberst can just ignore obozo andnot take it up. If on the other hand he was 100% dertain of Kennedy’s vote then he would take it up jsut to slap obozo.


13 posted on 09/27/2011 7:27:10 PM PDT by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

They want to do the class warfare and the racial warfare thing during the election.

Obama will say he is “rooting for the middle class” and paint Republicans as being for “millionaires and billionaires”.

He is such a LIAR. Again!


16 posted on 09/27/2011 7:34:06 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
I suspect that Ginsberg's health may be the real issue for the speedy hearing.
24 posted on 09/27/2011 7:41:32 PM PDT by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
People in the Obama administration know that Obama is going to lose next fall even if he doesn't realize it. If they had asked for an en banc review, that would delay a USSC decision until 2013 when there might be a court member retiring in June or dying in office. You can pretty much count on the Republican party not allowing a vote on any Obama nominee until after the election next year.

Whichever GOP candidate is elected, you can be sure it will be a constitutional conservative and that will be the kiss of death for Obamacare.

Going to the USSC now is the only hope for Obamacare. In the end, it may not make much difference since the GOP will defund it or legislate out of existence if the GOP takes control of the Senate.

28 posted on 09/27/2011 7:47:00 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama knows that his health care bill is doomed to fail one way or another... there is no way to avoid it.

He also knows it is the one key element which is choking this economy to a much quicker death than he anticipated.

It is my belief that Obama is prepared to lose in the Supreme Court to collect on the resulting bounty of an economy bursting back to life just before the election.

If however the Supreme Court rules in his favor, there will be an outcry across this country the likes that nobody has seen in their lifetimes. Such a ruling to uphold Obamacare could easily throw us over the edge of the cliff, giving Obama everything he needs to intall martial law and complete his “Fundamental Transformation”. Such a scenario could even delay or suspend the 2012 elections.

This is easy... its Obama’s end game. A win - win for him.


51 posted on 09/27/2011 8:49:02 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
It’s pretty hard to see a President Rick Perry or Mitt Romney asking his attorney general to defend the health reform law given that both have pledged to overturn the legislation.

LOL. I could see a Romney administration defending it with no trouble at all.
69 posted on 09/27/2011 9:29:32 PM PDT by Antoninus (Take the pledge: I will not vote for Mitt Romney under any circumstances. EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
This is pure politics on Obama's part

Win or lose, he will make it a campaign issue.

92 posted on 09/28/2011 2:12:10 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ll tell you exactly what these clowns are going to try, they’ll just wait until the very last second and claim that the individual mandate is a tax and that will be the end of the argument.


94 posted on 09/28/2011 2:55:02 AM PDT by mapmaker77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand; tired_old_conservative; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; ...

SCOTUS ping.

(Anyone on/off, freepmail me.)


96 posted on 09/28/2011 4:17:28 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s hard to see why this would be any different from Medicare Parts B & D.

Medicare participation/payments are mandatory during working years and upon retirement participants have premiums automatically deducted from SS checks.

Contrary to conventional criticism of GWBush’s Part D; the addition of ‘drug insurance’ encourages the elderly to purchase drugs - perhaps preventing more serious complications of otherwise unmedicated/untreated disease. JMHO


103 posted on 09/28/2011 7:38:09 AM PDT by sodpoodle (God is ignoring me - but He is watching you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson