Posted on 08/26/2011 11:16:27 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Palin can. Perry cannot.
All the pollsters have an agenda, ALL the pollsters! They are ALL either MSM or Rep Est. If you can not see that then there is nothing I can say to you.
If Sarah gets in she wins the nomination, I really doubt that she will lead in many polls, but will win, that will prove my point.
Sarah will win the Iowa Caucuses, but she will not lead any/many polls. You will not see her leading in the Des M Register.
No way she wins the nomination. Ill give anyone 5 to 1 odds on it.
I’ll take those odds too. Never lost a bet on a presidential race since Reagan won his first term. Say $20 to FR if I lose, $100 if you lose?
Have my bet money standing by, and will be putting on my bet at the bookies on the 1st November, once I see the full Conservative field.
It’s delusional if you think that 6 or 7 different polling agencies, all with different agendas, are all stacking polls against Palin. The FACT is, people know her, and don’t like her. Is it fair? No. But its still the truth.
On what delusions do you base this?
And since you believe them when they say the ineluctable Palin is unelectable, you have to believe them when they say CFR-Rick is mean. He's a bully.
Can't have a mean President.
I wasn’t being a smartass. I accidentally posted too many times.
I do not believe in the “science” of partisan polling...However if you want to go by partisan manufactured polling data, go to RCP ...Palin is in third spot, leaving Bachmann in the dust.
Fox and Rasmussen are the worst perhaps, CNN may actually be the farest one...yes I actually said CNN, but make no mistake I do not trust any of them, they treated GW Bush the same way, and he won a 2nd term regardless.
Yes they have a hatred/fear of Gov Palin,ALL of them
Do I win automatically if she doesn't enter the race?
If you could actually post this, I am forced to disregard any possibillity that anything you ever have posted or ever might post on this or any other forum could be competent.
LOL! Except two terms as Vice President under Eisenhower, including six weeks as acting President while Eisenhower was recovering from a heart attack, presiding over Cabinet meetings, major work on the Civil Rights Act's passage, and embarking on countless foreign trips in Eisenhower's stead including a couple to the Soviet Union.
Yeah, no executive experience there.
Do I win automatically if she doesn’t enter the race?
Only just saw your reply - it is good to see a true sportsman!
I’d say if she doesn’t enter it is a null bet, but am amenable to your suggestion.
I would say respectfully he was doing the work of his boss....of course I am aware he was Veep. My point was he did more “legislative” in scope. I also noted at the top my brush was broad.
Nixon’s problems, insofar as the ones he brought on himself, were due to his willingness to work with liberals. See: wage controls, EPA. He did not soar as an executive, but as a crafter of legislation and diplomat.
Thanks for the pic of RINO Cowboy :)
SARAH PALIN OR BUST!
I am in on same conditions
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.