Posted on 08/12/2011 12:04:06 PM PDT by winoneforthegipper
Photo
(Excerpt) Read more at yfrog.com ...
Great work. Just a fun, mundane statement of pride in motherhood, not blasphemy or a political announcement.
Yep - obviously a sign she is running. Who can’t see that?
I knew there had to be more to the shirt, LOL.
Palin-bots are funny.
“It means she’s running. HAHAHA. She’s so brilliant”.
Anyways, it had much longer legs coming about the same time as the "I don't see that happening" comment about Perry and Romney being the last two standing.
Obviously that T-shirt has PDS.
ping for later....
We care a lot more about what Red South has to say than we do you. So give it a break.
Thread spoiler.
If you zoom on the front of the shirt in one of the pics, it seems to have a lot of I ams. One of them is I am happiness.
Good grief. Take a breath.
ltc8k6, you get all the credit. I just had to do a little more work from your link to get to photos that I could post here.
“Yep - obviously a sign she is running.”
Hmm. Wearing such an obvious shirt about motherhood seems to be saying that she is a mom above all else, and that she will remain a mom and not be a president. OR - it is a trick to make one think that is what she thinks and then....
BTW - I still think the shadow on that one image is of the Madonna.
And - what did it mean again when Paul McCartney was barefoot on the album cover?
I’m sure I’m not the only one who’s noticed that her supporters are a very sensitive bunch and perceive any little thing to be a slight or attack.
I'm one of Sarah Palin's supporters - and I agree with you. I believe the reason for the hyper-sensitivity you note is due to the fact that (a) Palin supporters are very dedicated and, (b) she has been and will continue to be smeared, denigrated, mocked and lied about by the liberal media. When her supporters visit a conservative message forum such as FR, they don't expect to see practically the same kind of arguments against Palin or the kind of harsh criticisms she receives on any non-conservative website. That doesn't mean Sarah Palin is above criticism and I'm sure she would be the first to say so. Still, although I don't expect Free Republic to be a 100% Sarah Palin cheering section (that would be boring as well as unrealistic) I can understand why many Palin supporters (like me) are quick to fire back when she is (what we may view as) 'attacked'. I try not to over-react and just ignore nasty posts about Sarah Palin because there are plenty of 'FReepers' who will spend hours exchanging hostile posts with Palin detractors. Frankly, I don't have the time or the inclination. However, if - as in your case - I detect a poster is just posing an honest question regarding Palin and not seeking to insult or denigrate her - or her supporters, I'll respond, if time permits. This is one of those times.
Here’s another bunch of pix. The crowds are there.
http://barbaricthoughts.com/2011/08/palin-in-iowa-pics/
Paul is dead.
The armed, musclebound, frowny-faced, shade wearing human kind.
Communists are very good at one thing: Detecting the individuals who represent the greatest threat to their diseased ideology. And, as power-obsessed, amoral atheists they will stop at nothing in eliminating that threat.
It seems to me you posted a conclusion following your question without waiting for someone else to answer it.
Nobody but God and His Son should claim I AM.
So, if I asked if you are a retired greyhound lover and you answered, "I am", are you claiming to be the one, "I AM"?
Sorry...
Is that the Royal “We”, or the editorial “We”?
Or perhaps you hear voices?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.