Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/12/2011 9:37:20 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: ilovesarah2012

They make it sound like its her fault for being the target of union thugs.


2 posted on 07/12/2011 9:38:26 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012
She and her staff over the years have requested police protection or investigations when her house was egged; when protesters threw glitter on her or held up critical signs; when her campaign yard signs were stolen; when a man wrote an email perceived as a threat; and when she screamed that two women were holding her hostage "against my will" in a city hall restroom.

I have no problem with any of this. (That is, requesting police action on vandals, thieves, and abusive/threatening actions.)

3 posted on 07/12/2011 9:39:03 AM PDT by kevkrom (Imagine if the media spent 1/10 the effort vetting Obama as they've used against Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

This is all they got? Sounds like Palin redux. Good thing they didn’t announce the thousands of hours they spent going over police records with a fine toothed comb like they did with Sara’s emails.


4 posted on 07/12/2011 9:40:40 AM PDT by FrdmLvr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

Looks to me like scumbags doing what scumbags do....hope the cops arrested most if not all of them.


5 posted on 07/12/2011 9:40:55 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

Looks to me like she had good reason to call the police. The article should read, “threats and harassment dog Michelle Bachmann”


6 posted on 07/12/2011 9:41:17 AM PDT by justsaynomore (Herman Cain 2012 - http://www.arealleader.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

So you wish to attack a conservative for getting attack because she is a conservative??? This is twilight zone stuff.


10 posted on 07/12/2011 9:45:26 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

Controversy?
How about left wing violence.


11 posted on 07/12/2011 9:45:53 AM PDT by Bon mots ("When seconds count, the police are just minutes away...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

Bachmann’s threatened and it portrayed in the header as she deserved it?


12 posted on 07/12/2011 9:48:04 AM PDT by RINOs suck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

All the bad info dug up by the “free” press on Obastard amounted to a lot of stuff but America didn’t buy it and elected him anyway.


13 posted on 07/12/2011 9:51:16 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist (Congress doesn't care a damn about "we the people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

Shows you pay a price for being a conservative. So much easier to be a lazy liberal.


14 posted on 07/12/2011 9:55:07 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012
Are you kidding me? When did Freeper Palin supporters who've gone over the edge become reporters for the Sun Sentinel?

You are no different than Pissant...same type of obsession.

Wardaddy and Mrs pay large to see Sarah at private event in Nashville..what did you do for Sarah besides be a jackass on Free Republic?< a>

18 posted on 07/12/2011 9:59:57 AM PDT by wardaddy (Palin or Bachman..either with Marco....I'm often on DroidX..in bed late...hence my spelling..sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012
Controversy

Controversy?

Controversial to whom?
The media?

OK. Now I get it...
Smear with made-up headlines.
20 posted on 07/12/2011 10:02:31 AM PDT by frankenMonkey (Because he was the son you bore, And gave to that wind blowing and that tide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

The flak is getting thick.


26 posted on 07/12/2011 10:09:11 AM PDT by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

Well, just wait til the papers start publishing all the police reports on Obama! That’ll show ‘em!


29 posted on 07/12/2011 10:11:47 AM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012
We have a bastard in the White House who never really came clean on HIS background.

His wife was the daughter of a Democrat Party Boss in Chicago - now THAT must have a TON of dirt behind it.

Yet SILENCE from the Lamestream media. They were too busy beating up on Palin and now Bachmann.

THis is crap and everyone on this forum should DELUGE papers like this with letters and e-mails, as well as the particular authors of these vituperative articles.

The Presidential Election has started already and the mainstream media are in all out campaign mode, attacking any of those candidates they view as a real threat to their Marxist Kenyan God. Except NOTABLY - the one they KNOW who can't win - ROMNEY.

They are going for a repeat of the McCain fiasco with another loser for us.

30 posted on 07/12/2011 10:11:47 AM PDT by ZULU (Lindsey Graham is a nanometrical pustule of pusillanimous putrescence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

Note how the headline makes it appear or implies SHE has a police record.


34 posted on 07/12/2011 10:18:46 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

All that the idiot who wrote this article has done here is to further dilute the meaning of “polarize.” He uses the term as though it’s a bad thing for the voters to represent two opposing points of view. That, of course, is typical of any liberal, to whom the term “bipartisan” means that democrats get their way on every aspect of an issue.

Nothing going on here that amounts to anything.


35 posted on 07/12/2011 10:18:55 AM PDT by DPMD (~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012
Well, I think it's obvious now that we must all go vote for a Marxist/Democrat! </sarcasm>
38 posted on 07/12/2011 10:24:26 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

My headline: “Leftists Repeatedly Attack Michele Bachmann”.


39 posted on 07/12/2011 10:24:56 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

What is Bachman’s problem?! She must be stupid!

The message for her to sacrifice her principles was loud and clear......all she has to do is comply and stop wasting the authorities’ time!!!!


40 posted on 07/12/2011 10:26:57 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson