Palin Movie to Screen at AMC Theatres

NationalJournal.com ^ | june 10.2011 | Althea Fung

[Daffynition]

A documentary film chronicling the rise of former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) will play exclusively at AMC Theatres in Dallas, Atlanta, and a host of other cities in the South and Midwest beginning in July.

Cinedigm Digital Cinema Corporation announced Friday that the Stephen Bannon film The Undefeated, about Palin’s rise in Alaska politics, will roll out at select theaters on July 15. The film makes no attempt at objectivity, featuring Palin supporters and conservative political commentators and bloggers like Tammy Bruce and Andrew Breitbart.

The film is expected to premiere later this month in Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina, before the national rollout in Atlanta, Dallas, Denver, Oklahoma City, Phoenix, Houston, Kansas City, and Indianapolis.

“After screening The Undefeated, we took the unusual step of immediately exploring an expedited theatrical release," said Trevor Drinkwater, CEO of ARC Entertainment, the company handling distribution of the film.

Palin supporters who don't live in the cities where the film is airing still have an opportunity to watch the documentary. Cinedigm is offering the public the chance to vote for future screening locations.

[DoughtyOne]

Did you happen to look at the third post you linked there?

There was nothing negative about Palin in it. SJB made a comment that was unflattering to Romeny.

Two posts later LakeShark agreed with him.

Rintinse, SJB is a decent person. He doesn’t deserve to be piled on.

Just sayin’.

[DoughtyOne]

I came across this thread a little bit ago.
I know SJB to be a decent person. He’s not a troll and it angers me to see him be the focus of this nonsense.

One person was clearly out of line, and that person should have been the focus.

[sickoflibs]

RE :”I came across this thread a little bit ago.
I know SJB to be a decent person. He’s not a troll and it angers me to see him be the focus of this nonsense.”

I missed the second exchange you pointed out.

rintense posted this #104 which has just three links to SJB comments.
One comment he says he ‘agrees on all counts’ on a Palin comment. The other two are not even about Palin.

That sounds like a real 'pattern'.

Before that reintense also posted "I counted four threads in the first four pages of your in forum post. Just trying to keep you honest. :)" but then only posted the three links referenced above, two have nothing to do with Palin. I have seen this before someplace. You think there is a common script?

[SarahPalinForPresident2012]

“Fear is the mind killer” (Dune, Frank Herbert) What more needs to be said?

Let’s not be harsh with the PDSers — they need our loving guidance to help get back on the rails. It’s quite hard for them admit they are wrong when they are so far gone.

[calcowgirl]

Know what happens if someone puts your logon into the searchbar (upper right) and slects "user" then hits "enter?" They'll see dozens of hits on multiple Palin threads, just logged within the last 24-48 hours. Perhaps you'd like to accuse the "searchbar" of lying now?

I searched. I counted 3 Palin threads he posted on in the last several days. How many Palin threads have been posted in total over that same period? Did you bother to count? Regardless, what exactly was SJB's claim?

"I post on MAYBE one out of 30 Palin threads this year."

His statement is true.

Go back and count ALL his posts and ALL the Palin threads since January if you want to challenge him.

SJB is no fibber. You're way out of line accusing him of lying.

[calcowgirl]

I’m beginning to wonder how many don’t get the “Cats” reference.

Count me in that category...

Did you click on “Idolatry”? Funny vid.

Now I clicked and understand. ;-)

[DoughtyOne]

Whether there’s a common script or not, I’m tired of seeing people enter Palin threads and watch others swoop in on them in packs from 2 on up, trying to drive them off whether they have been unfair to Palin or not.

If someone doesn’t care for Palin but is reasoned about it, they have as much right to appear on a Palin thread as anyone else.

What good would it do to purge this forum of people who don’t like Palin, if she decides not to run?

I know some folks can’t see it, but we’re committing suicide here. To thrive this place needs different viewpoints within the Conservative mindset. We can’t simply tell everyone that isn’t impressed with Palin to go to hell, figuratively.

[calcowgirl]

So if I find one in the months January-June, you’ll die?

Absolutely incorrect.

Refresher:

SJB: "I post on MAYBE one out of 30 Palin threads this year."

[calcowgirl]

As usual, a voice of reason.

Good post, D1.

[DoughtyOne]

Sorry CalCowGirl, that’s a fairly complex concept there.

Can you break it down further?

[DoughtyOne]

Actually, it wasn’t all that. The fact there’s so little reason on some of these threads, tended to make it stand out.

Thanks for the nice comment.

It’s nice to see you here.

[sickoflibs]

RE :"Refresher: SJB: "I post on MAYBE one out of 30 Palin threads this year."

That would be about one thread a day during the bus tour. Has she finished jury duty yet?

I think someone missed the "..in 30.." part of that comment and thought it was one thread per year.

[calcowgirl]

...that’s a fairly complex concept there. Can you break it down further?

;-)

[calcowgirl]

I think someone missed the "..in 30.." part of that comment and thought it was one thread per year.

Yeah, I'm glad I set you straight.
(just kidding)

[DoughtyOne]

This should move that premise into the fact column.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2747049/posts?page=101#101

[calcowgirl]

It must be time to log off.
I lost track of what the premise was and what is being collected in the fact column. LOL.

[Gargantua]

LMAO!!!!

What's coming next, the tear-streaked hystrionics on a YouTube video:

"Why can't you just LEAVE SJB ALONE???!!!!! Waaaaahhhhh-waaahhhhh!"

Good grief. How embarrassingly pathetic!

Can he take the heat, or can't he? What is with all these hysterics over a guy picking an argument with me, and then calling in the "pantie-calvalry" when he gets caught exagerrating?

There were fewer than 24 Palin threads yesterday alone, and he posted on 2-or-3 of them, stalking me all over FreeRepublic, sending me several profane private emails saying "F-You!," threatening me telling me I was "going to die" and that "he'd be there." The pantload even suggested that we get together offline. Please, you talk to me about taking it way over the line...? Get real, Your West Coast Bovinity.

C'mon, try to set a grownup example for this cheeze-whiz. Get over it.

:^/

[Gargantua]

"...you are a DISRUPTOR with a foul mouth. Let Jim decide that one. [???] All of my posts are open to FReeper scruitiny."

Really? Okay, then here's a couple you sent old foul-mouthed me yesterday that the kids deserve to see, your wide open piousness:

"From stephenjohnbanker | 07/13/2011 7:29:14 PM PDT
F*** you, and send it to Jim. You will die, I will be here. A****le f’n liar!"

"From stephenjohnbanker | 07/13/2011 8:08:19 PM PDT
yOU NEVER HAD A DADDY. wANNA MEET ME SOMEWHERE?"

Nice. Reads like something you'd find on the wall in a Fire Island men's room. What a sterling, exemplary FReep debater. Real nice.

I'd suggest you consider taking a deep breath, counting to ten, manning up, and walking away.

;^\

[Gargantua]

"Making stuff up isn’t going to accomplish anything..."

Quite. I couldn't agree more. So, in all collegial candor, if you don't mind letting us in on it, praytell, what did I "make up"?

Thank you.

;^\

[rintense]

So then you also get why Palin supporters are sick of the usual suspects doing the exact same thing.